This is the place where Stones fans can advertise anything for sale, wanted, trade or whatever, from fan to fan. Advertisements are for free.
To see the old ads
go here.
Re: What does ".m4a" mean as a file extension?
Date: July 31, 2007 03:56
Buffalo,
Thank you! To all others thanks as well. Buffalo, does this mean that if I download these m4a files, that they are automatically at least 320 kps? I have not been able to learn how to do flac for 2 years now and mp3 is so much more easier to use. When I convert the m4a to mp3, it asks me "at what bitrate" to which I select 320 of course. At the same time I may be transferring a 128 m4a to a 320 kps mp3 (and if that's the case, there is no point in changing it to an mp3 at all, right?
Charles Baudelaire
1821-1869
Re: What does ".m4a" mean as a file extension?
Posted by:
buffalo7478
()
Date: August 3, 2007 19:18
APE? New one by me.
I have heard part of War Memorial Buffalo in 1975 as Hotter the Hell or Hot as Hell, a semi-rough soundboard of part of the concert.
Still pissed that I did not attend that show 32 years later. I went from Stones fan to non-Stones fan, enjoying the likes of Yes, Procol Harum and Emerson, Lake and Palmer from around 1974-1976 as a 14-15 yr old.
Thankfully I turned back to being into the Stones and the Who by the time I was 16.
If you can't figure out the APE file, let me know, and I'll upload the MP3 files I have of that show.
Re: What does ".m4a" mean as a file extension?
Date: August 4, 2007 01:12
Vancouver (or anyone for that matter):
If I take an M4a file burned at 128 kps and transfer it to a regular 320kps mp3 file, will the sound be better? I would think not since the source would have been at 128kps. I appreciate any help understanding this.
Best Regards,
Charles Baudelaire
1821-1869
Re: What does ".m4a" mean as a file extension?
Date: August 4, 2007 02:25
Charles Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Vancouver (or anyone for that matter):
>
> If I take an M4a file burned at 128 kps and
> transfer it to a regular 320kps mp3 file, will the
> sound be better? I would think not since the
> source would have been at 128kps. I appreciate
> any help understanding this.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Charles Baudelaire
> 1821-1869
very right: the sound will never get any better then, in this case, M4a@128. only the file will be bigger.
what has been taken out to get a lower bitrate and doing so a smaller file, is lost forever.
in comparision: m4a@128 = +- mp3@160
m4a and mp3 are both ment as compressing music files. no program can give you back what's not there anymore in the file.
hope this clears up things a little bit!