I'm looking for the version of Hot Stuff from Black and blue Deluxe without the mistake
Thanks

It's on all digital platforms, e.g. [www.Qobuz.com] , [Music.Apple.com] , [www.YouTube.com] .

Can you describe this mistake, please?

Quote
andrews27
Can you describe this mistake, please?

On every physical releases there is a missing "Hot" at 2'50 or so, it does not appear on the digital platforms versions !



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2026-01-01 20:19 by Honestman.

I just played mine - the physical copy that I purchased from my local music store.

It's true - just after 2:50. they sing "Stuff", not "Hot Stuff". An interesting oddity. I wonder how or why that happened.

And yes, in [www.youtube.com], "Hot" is heard at that point.

Next "oddity" question: does anybody know why CD2 track 1 is titled "I Love A Lady" in my physical copy packaging, but the video at [www.youtube.com] is titled "I Love Ladies"?

Quote
stonesman87
does anybody know why CD2 track 1 is titled "I Love A Lady" in my physical copy packaging, but the video at [www.youtube.com] is titled "I Love Ladies"?

The long-circulating bootleg of that song is known as both “I Love Ladies” and “Sexy Nite,” and many people still refer to it by these names.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2026-01-01 22:12 by blakeeik.

Quote
stonesman87

does anybody know why CD2 track 1 is titled "I Love A Lady" in my physical copy packaging, but the video at [www.youtube.com] is titled "I Love Ladies"?

It's also printed wrongly on the discs - [iorr.org] - and was also wrongly announced for the release - [iorr.org] .

Universal Music Japan wrongly listed 'The Moon Is Up' as 9th track on the album - [iorr.org] , [iorr.org] . But this mistake was corrected shortly afterwards.

The 2m:50s "... Stuff" error was immediately detected on 16-Oct-2025 - [iorr.org] .

Other complaints would be warped Vinyl-LPs or a brickwalled mastering (low dynamic range) at the digital releases.

Quote
stonesman87


Next "oddity" question: does anybody know why CD2 track 1 is titled "I Love A Lady" in my physical copy packaging, but the video at [www.youtube.com] is titled "I Love Ladies"?

Good question, but I'm rather positive that I Love Ladies is the correct title and only the Japanese editions (maybe fabricated later?) got it right.

- In 1976 interviews (e.g. with US Rolling Stone magazine) Mick already namedropped the title as I Love Ladies.
- In their social media campaigns before the album release they titled it I Love Ladies.
- And when they released the video for it they also officially titled it I Love Ladies.
- Also Mick sings "I love the ladies" and describes them all (the title I Love A Lady wouldn't make sense...).

And the sloppy credits on the cover and label artwork continue with missing composer credits for the 6 new tracks...(I wonder who gets the royalties for the 4 non-coverversions - all solely for Jagger/Richards again?).

N



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2026-01-02 10:55 by NeddieFlanders.

also titled Sexy Nite on the old and lovely vinyl bootleg Reggae’n Roll
If I remember good

Quote
fela
also titled Sexy Nite on the old and lovely vinyl bootleg Reggae’n Roll
If I remember good

But this title was a bootlegger's invention and should be ignored here.

N

That was discussed to death
Hot is missing at 2:50 on all physical releases
Hot was re-installed on digital downloads
The reason is unknown. Most probably 'a human factor.' The band and Universal are silent and do not provide explanations and/or acknowledge the error.

There is also a fade in for Hey Negrita

There is a misprint for I Love A Lady (which is not present on Japanese SHM-CD release, it is listed I Love Ladies there)

Here is a bit on Hot Stuff.
[iorr.org]
'Old' mix is remix w/o Hot, new mix - remix with Hot.

Quote
ironbelly

The reason is unknown. Most probably 'a human factor.'

Probably not. Quote: "Compared to the Beatles, the Kinks or the Who, it seems that there's always something missing or wrong with the Stones releases" - [iorr.org] . Yeah, always these 'random' mistakes - incomplete, bad mastering or other flaws. But true fans will buy the releases 3 times ....

Quote
Honestman

Quote
andrews27
Can you describe this mistake, please?

On every physical releases there is a missing "Hot" at 2'50 or so, it does not appear on the digital platforms versions !

Happened the same way the "On Air" BBC sessions CD acquired a repeated verse in one of the songs, I think on The Last Time.

Very annoying, and unprofessional to the point of deserving consumer complaints. It's sad when bootleggers are better archivists than the record companies of legacy acts.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2026-01-03 19:42 by andrews27.

Quote
NeddieFlanders

Quote
stonesman87


Next "oddity" question: does anybody know why CD2 track 1 is titled "I Love A Lady" in my physical copy packaging, but the video at [www.youtube.com] is titled "I Love Ladies"?

Good question, but I'm rather positive that I Love Ladies is the correct title and only the Japanese editions (maybe fabricated later?) got it right.

- In 1976 interviews (e.g. with US Rolling Stone magazine) Mick already namedropped the title as I Love Ladies.
- In their social media campaigns before the album release they titled it I Love Ladies.
- And when they released the video for it they also officially titled it I Love Ladies.
- Also Mick sings "I love the ladies" and describes them all (the title I Love A Lady wouldn't make sense...).

And the sloppy credits on the cover and label artwork continue with missing composer credits for the 6 new tracks...(I wonder who gets the royalties for the 4 non-coverversions - all solely for Jagger/Richards again?).

N

You're correct about "fabricated later." There was about a month delay in the deluxe box being available in Japan. The two disc version was available on the original release date.

Duck

I wrote to UMUK again last week.

"...the relevant team is actively working to resolve this as quickly as possible. I will reach back out with an update as soon as possible."

Quote
NeilB
I wrote to UMUK again last week.

"...the relevant team is actively working to resolve this as quickly as possible. I will reach back out with an update as soon as possible."

At least that sounds promising

Quote
NeilB
I wrote to UMUK again last week.

"...the relevant team is actively working to resolve this as quickly as possible. I will reach back out with an update as soon as possible."

You've been lucky to get an answer, I wrote them more than one month ago and I'm still waiting for an answer...let's wait a bit more



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2026-01-10 08:06 by Honestman.