Sent this out to a few people thinking that would be it. I don't want to get tangled any further in the sharing debate, especially IEM, but I know a lot of people will be happy to have this. So here it is. This is the EVSD set. I believe it's an IEM/Audience Matrix, could be wrong though. But I have to warn you Keith's vocals are almost washed out during his set. Gratitude to whoever made this possible (like the taper). As always I scanned the artwork. Enjoy!

[we.tl]

Thanks for this

Quote
frankotero
Sent this out to a few people thinking that would be it. I don't want to get tangled any further in the sharing debate, especially IEM, but I know a lot of people will be happy to have this. So here it is. This is the EVSD set. I believe it's an IEM/Audience Matrix, could be wrong though. But I have to warn you Keith's vocals are almost washed out during his set. Gratitude to whoever made this possible (like the taper). As always I scanned the artwork. Enjoy!

[we.tl]

Many thanks for this, but can you upload this in lossless, this is mp3

About the lossy/lossless question. After I ripped the CDs I did a comparison, MP3 and FLAC and they were the same. So I deleted the FLACs because it's just taking unnecessary space. In other words the original source on the discs is MP3.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024-09-22 21:27 by frankotero.

Flac is always better than mp3.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024-09-22 22:28 by Andrea82.

Many thanks for bringing this to us.

Someone needs to rip the cd's as wav files so that everyone can know once and for all if the original files were lossy.

not blind, was blindmansbluff, is acetboy

Thank you. I don't think that this is a matrix with an audience recording, otherwise Keith's vocals would be more audible and there would be more audience noise between the songs. Sounds like a pure IEM.
(BTW, the Mayflower release MF-255/256 is a matrix imo. Anyone has it and could share?)



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024-09-22 23:28 by wiredallnight.

More info on my rip. I ripped them first into WAV format. Then converted those files to MP3 to compare them using a program called Spek. That's where I noticed no difference in the files. If it was lossless there would have been higher frequencies. here's a link to Spek if anyone is interested. [www.spek.cc]

Flac is always better than mp3.


Someone needs to rip the cd's as wav files so that everyone can know once and for all if the original files were lossy.

Aw man I shoulda scrolled before hitting the button

Thank you thank you
It feels so good to rock out

I'm excited of the idea that someone might find a true lossless version (not MP3 boosted) and then post it here. This would be great.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2024-09-23 00:55 by frankotero.

Thank you.

Quote
frankotero
More info on my rip. I ripped them first into WAV format. Then converted those files to MP3 to compare them using a program called Spek. That's where I noticed no difference in the files. If it was lossless there would have been higher frequencies. here's a link to Spek if anyone is interested. [www.spek.cc]

Oh, well shoot. It's kind of seeming like the CD was sourced from lossy files.
Seems weird that they would do it that way.
Of course maybe whoever recorded in the first place accidentally recorded as mp3.

Or someone didn't want to share lossless files. Probably never know.

It is pretty cool though. Nice recording mostly.

not blind, was blindmansbluff, is acetboy

Thanks!!

Quote
Andrea82

Flac is always better than mp3.

"Original source is lossy" - [www.dbboots.com] . "Just Mp3 for now" - [iorr.org] . "There was some motivation in releasing this mix as an mp3" - [iorr.org] . "keys-heavy mix" - [iorr.org] .

The Mayflower MF-255/256 seems to be another source - [iorr.org] .



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2024-09-23 03:45 by Irix.

I don't expect the lossless files to appear because of the obvious reason.

Any news on an IEM for LA night 2, the 13th? I was at that show so itd be awesome to have that one!

So just to recap, this is Empress Valley bootlegging my 3-feed keys heavy matrix, correct? The one that was only released at ~160kps mp3, and never released lossless?

Just go back to the original mp3 files instead of this if so...

Quote
senecastj
So just to recap, this is Empress Valley bootlegging my 3-feed keys heavy matrix, correct? The one that was only released at ~160kps mp3, and never released lossless?

No, it is not your keys heavy nonsense. It is a quite normal sounding IEM with only Keith's vocals too low (and Mick's a bit too high).



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2024-09-23 10:34 by wiredallnight.

Thank you very much for this. Unfortunately, the guitars are too much in the background in the mix

Thank You

Thank you very much

Thanks very much!!!

Thanks!

Someone in Germany sells the LA-1 IEM Mayflower MF-255/256 for €60 - [Kleinanzeigen.de] .

Also the Mayflowers MF-235..237, MF-238/239, MF-242..247 and MF-250..253 - [Kleinanzeigen.de] , [Kleinanzeigen.de] , [Kleinanzeigen.de] .

Quote
blindman

Quote
frankotero
More info on my rip. I ripped them first into WAV format. Then converted those files to MP3 to compare them using a program called Spek. That's where I noticed no difference in the files. If it was lossless there would have been higher frequencies. here's a link to Spek if anyone is interested. [www.spek.cc]

Oh, well shoot. It's kind of seeming like the CD was sourced from lossy files.
Seems weird that they would do it that way.
Of course maybe whoever recorded in the first place accidentally recorded as mp3.

Or someone didn't want to share lossless files. Probably never know.

It is pretty cool though. Nice recording mostly.

I've seen bootleg companies release stuff with MP3 compression so it wouldn't get shared on torrent sites, which prohibit lossy stuff. Stops it from hitting torrents and cutting into their margins...but doesn't really stop the collectors from buying it up anyways.