Quote
EddieByword

I've got to point out once more though. I've watched the "without taper's consent" issue roll out for 9 years here. To my knowledge he's only gone against the taper's "consent" twice. Everybody else has given consent or not cared.
The first was an accident 9 years ago, primarily because the taper didn't indicate anyone needed consent. (Need for consent - Unkown on iorr before that).
And second, Little tendy's New orleans - not 100% sure why but the fact is, he did improve it despite the taper claiming that was not possible.....so, really, where's the crime? .. I mean if he'd really screwed it up - but he didn't.
You would think the taper might say "Wow, I didn't think that was posible, thanks" but no. Just an onslaught of nothingness.

Ok, gardening to do.

Quote
NeddieFlanders

Quote
EddieByword

I've got to point out once more though. I've watched the "without taper's consent" issue roll out for 9 years here. To my knowledge he's only gone against the taper's "consent" twice. Everybody else has given consent or not cared.
The first was an accident 9 years ago, primarily because the taper didn't indicate anyone needed consent. (Need for consent - Unknown on iorr before that).
And second, Little tendy's New orleans - not 100% sure why but the fact is, he did improve it despite the taper claiming that was not possible.....so, really, where's the crime? .. I mean if he'd really screwed it up - but he didn't.
You would think the taper might say "Wow, I didn't think that was possible, thanks" but no. Just an onslaught of nothingness.

Ok, gardening to do.

That's not all, the list is long (from what I remember):
- he invented song titles (e.g. for ABC&D Of Boogie Woogie tracks he couldn't identify)
- he doesn't give credit where credit is due (e.g. cutting and pasting his booklets for many of his artworks from www.nzentgraf.de )
and worst of all
- self-created outfakes without stating it (e.g. expanding the instrumental Miss You from the Art Collins outtakes with looped sequences).

N

Quote
EddieByword

Quote
NeddieFlanders

Quote
EddieByword

I've got to point out once more though. I've watched the "without taper's consent" issue roll out for 9 years here. To my knowledge he's only gone against the taper's "consent" twice. Everybody else has given consent or not cared.
The first was an accident 9 years ago, primarily because the taper didn't indicate anyone needed consent. (Need for consent - Unknown on iorr before that).
And second, Little tendy's New orleans - not 100% sure why but the fact is, he did improve it despite the taper claiming that was not possible.....so, really, where's the crime? .. I mean if he'd really screwed it up - but he didn't.
You would think the taper might say "Wow, I didn't think that was possible, thanks" but no. Just an onslaught of nothingness.

Ok, gardening to do.

That's not all, the list is long (from what I remember):
- he invented song titles (e.g. for ABC&D Of Boogie Woogie tracks he couldn't identify)
- he doesn't give credit where credit is due (e.g. cutting and pasting his booklets for many of his artworks from www.nzentgraf.de )
and worst of all
- self-created outfakes without stating it (e.g. expanding the instrumental Miss You from the Art Collins outtakes with looped sequences).

N

Well, all of that's as maybe (I don't follow that side of things but that's not a great way to go about things) but..... all I've objected to is this lie that he is a serial "remasterer without consent".

Quote
NeddieFlanders

Quote
EddieByword

Quote
NeddieFlanders

Quote
EddieByword

I've got to point out once more though. I've watched the "without taper's consent" issue roll out for 9 years here. To my knowledge he's only gone against the taper's "consent" twice. Everybody else has given consent or not cared.
The first was an accident 9 years ago, primarily because the taper didn't indicate anyone needed consent. (Need for consent - Unknown on iorr before that).
And second, Little tendy's New orleans - not 100% sure why but the fact is, he did improve it despite the taper claiming that was not possible.....so, really, where's the crime? .. I mean if he'd really screwed it up - but he didn't.
You would think the taper might say "Wow, I didn't think that was possible, thanks" but no. Just an onslaught of nothingness.

Ok, gardening to do.

That's not all, the list is long (from what I remember):
- he invented song titles (e.g. for ABC&D Of Boogie Woogie tracks he couldn't identify)
- he doesn't give credit where credit is due (e.g. cutting and pasting his booklets for many of his artworks from www.nzentgraf.de )
and worst of all
- self-created outfakes without stating it (e.g. expanding the instrumental Miss You from the Art Collins outtakes with looped sequences).

N

Well, all of that's as maybe (I don't follow that side of things but that's not a great way to go about things) but..... all I've objected to is this lie that he is a serial "remasterer without consent".

There's no "maybe" in my list above, these are all facts.

As I see your name all over the Hot Stuff forum since many years you probably know that there's some common standards among collectors - like giving credit, like not faking recordings or facts and like respecting the wishes of the tapers and uploaders. Rskinno ignores all all of these. Maybe it's because he speaks next to no english or maybe it's because he doesn't give a sh1t, I don't know, but these are the only "maybes" here.
N