For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
gotdablouse
Thanks !
Ah that' the Farve4 we discussed at length in the "Dime" topic, thought it was another one, my bad for not reading until the end !
So is the jury still out on whether it's an IEM/Audience matrix ? Mick's voice sounds strange at times with "distortion", it's quite audible when he talks at 4:40 in Angry, could be an interference in the IEM feed...
Quote
daspyknows
Unless he bought or borrowed iem gear for this show it's not an iem. As par as folks I know in iem circles, they are laughing at this discussion. Maybe someone should pm him on Dime and ask.
Quote
ProfessorWolfQuote
gotdablouse
Thanks !
Ah that' the Farve4 we discussed at length in the "Dime" topic, thought it was another one, my bad for not reading until the end !
So is the jury still out on whether it's an IEM/Audience matrix ? Mick's voice sounds strange at times with "distortion", it's quite audible when he talks at 4:40 in Angry, could be an interference in the IEM feed...
in my opinion it's an iem matrix and a damn good one at that
Quote
senecastj
A good stack tape, knowing your gear, and some luck on the crowd noise immediately around you can go pretty far.
Quote
daspyknowsQuote
senecastj
A good stack tape, knowing your gear, and some luck on the crowd noise immediately around you can go pretty far.
As the expert on iems I would take your analysis as the truth. For those questioning how good iems/iem audience matrix recordings sound maybe a snippet fron Santa Clara last tour will make the so called experts on here stfu.
Quote
ProfessorWolfQuote
daspyknows
Unless he bought or borrowed iem gear for this show it's not an iem. As par as folks I know in iem circles, they are laughing at this discussion. Maybe someone should pm him on Dime and ask.
huh
i guess that settles it (at least for me)
just out of curiosity what's your opinion of the quality of this recording?
is it as exceptional as we all seem to think it is?