For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
retired_dog
Well, if you believe that someone with 750 recorded shows in 11 years, considering the free time it needs, not to speak of the costs for tickets and travel expenses even across the continents, is an amateur who's doing it all for free, you must be pretty naive - looks more like a well-oiled underground business enterprise in my book.
However, he and his "group" are free to do or don't do whatever they want in my book, what I can't stand (and this is where this controversy started) is this arrogant "high-horse" stance to constantly dangle with the carrots in form of Stones recordings he/his group has/have, but "unfortunately" not being able to share because, oh so many years ago someone oh so bad from this board dared to "remaster" some of "their" oh so sacrosanct work, which morally and legally in itself is nothing more than the result of, let's face it, illegal activity.
Quote
retired_dog
Well, if you believe that someone with 750 recorded shows in 11 years, considering the free time it needs, not to speak of the costs for tickets and travel expenses even across the continents, is an amateur who's doing it all for free, you must be pretty naive - looks more like a well-oiled underground business enterprise in my book.
However, he and his "group" are free to do or don't do whatever they want in my book, what I can't stand (and this is where this controversy started) is this arrogant "high-horse" stance to constantly dangle with the carrots in form of Stones recordings he/his group has/have, but "unfortunately" not being able to share because, oh so many years ago someone oh so bad from this board dared to "remaster" some of "their" oh so sacrosanct work, which morally and legally in itself is nothing more than the result of, let's face it, illegal activity.