Which Oakland 10-31-94 recording/remastering sucks the least?

1994.10.31 ML 9512-13 Voodoo at halloween
1994.10.31 TSP-CD-195-2 All Hallow's Eve
1994.10.31_TSD_Oakland_Mixing_Board

THANK YOU



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2019-11-09 23:45 by andrews27.

Voodoo At Halloween is in stereo and to recommend.
All Hallow's Eve is in mono only -> forget it!
I don't know Oakland Mixing Board

I always thought it was a bland lifeless perf... Maybe watching it eases the sense of boredom somewhat...

Quote
dcba
I always thought it was a bland lifeless perf... Maybe watching it eases the sense of boredom somewhat...

He did not ask for the performance but for the recording.

I had a quick listen to both "1994.10.31 ML 9512-13 Voodoo at Halloween" and "1994.10.31_TSD_Oakland_Mixing_Board"

Mixing Board is very good, but Voodoo at Halloween is better.

Chris from Belgium

THANKS, Chris and wiredallnight.

This is why I asked:

[www.youtube.com]

Was this a PPV event that I missed?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2019-11-11 00:31 by andrews27.

There's a very nice Beast of Burden from that show.

Quote
wiredallnight

Quote
dcba
I always thought it was a bland lifeless perf... Maybe watching it eases the sense of boredom somewhat...

He did not ask for the performance but for the recording.

Well not answering the question asked is a tradition here at IORR...

Quote
dcba

Quote
wiredallnight

Quote
dcba
I always thought it was a bland lifeless perf... Maybe watching it eases the sense of boredom somewhat...

He did not ask for the performance but for the recording.

Well not answering the question asked is a tradition here at IORR...

Some of it is pretty good .... "Beast of Burden", "It's All Over Now" , and as far as '94 performance of "Heartbreaker" goes.

Could anyone please re-post these? The links no longer work to download.

Thanks!

Robert

Download link

[wetransfer.com]


RS 1994 LIVE - 941031 All Hallow's Eve TSP-CD-195-2.rar



[bootlegpedia.com]

Download link
[wetransfer.com]


RS 1994 LIVE - 941031 VOODOO AT HALLOWEEN ML 9512-13.rar



[bootlegpedia.com]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2019-11-12 04:32 by exilestones.

Thank you so much!!!

THANK YOU!!!

tx for upping

Quote
dcba
I always thought it was a bland lifeless perf... Maybe watching it eases the sense of boredom somewhat...

What's your favourite out of Oakland 1978 or Oakland 1994, dcba?

Quote
Erik_Snow

Quote
dcba
I always thought it was a bland lifeless perf... Maybe watching it eases the sense of boredom somewhat...

What's your favourite out of Oakland 1978 or Oakland 1994, dcba?

[www.youtube.com]

Quote
andrews27

Quote
Erik_Snow

Quote
dcba
I always thought it was a bland lifeless perf... Maybe watching it eases the sense of boredom somewhat...

What's your favourite out of Oakland 1978 or Oakland 1994, dcba?

[www.youtube.com]

Yeah, even though it's not one of the really great 1978 shows, it's still cooking - no contest

Erik, what's a great 1978 recording that's not Passaic, Lakeland, Atlanta, Lexington, Memphis, Buffalo, Detroit, New Orleans, Houston, Fort Worth, Anaheim or Oakland?

(If only there were better recordings of Atlanta and New Orleans...)

THANKS



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2019-11-12 21:39 by andrews27.

Of course it's subjective, but I don't consider Lakeland, Buffalo or 1st Anaheim to be that great, performancewise.
But I do think New York City, Washington DC, Myrtle Beach, St Paul and Tucson to be real fine. NYC and Washington DC is probably the best "sounding" ones of them, but they're still "good audience" only.

Relix article on the 1978 Passaic NJ show. The style is sometimes dodgy but the details are good:

[relix.com]

Cool !

Thanks. I was at Buffalo, so that improves it for me.

Quote
Erik_Snow

Quote
dcba
I always thought it was a bland lifeless perf... Maybe watching it eases the sense of boredom somewhat...

What's your favourite out of Oakland 1978 or Oakland 1994, dcba?

I need to brush up my 78 show.
"Funnily" they often gave poor shows in the Bay Area : 69 was plagued by tech problems. 72 & 75 were "nothing special" gigs (unlike the ones played in L.A.). Both 81 shows were pitiful ("thanks" to Ron who was fried on freebase).



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2019-11-12 23:09 by dcba.

Quote
dcba
"Funnily" they often gave poor shows in the Bay Area : 69 was plagued by tech problems. 72 & 75 were "nothing special" gigs (unlike the ones played in L.A.). Both 81 shows were pitiful ("thanks" to Ron who was fried on freebase).

Yes that's true. In addition to the technical problems in 69, it was simply too early in the tour, same goes for 72.

Imagine living in the Bay area, seeing Rolling Stones from 1969-1989, and the only "LA travels" one did was to the "video show" of 1975 and the "shoe show" in Anaheim 1978....one probably would believe Ladies & Gentlemen, GYYYO, LA Friday, Hampton broadcast, Atlantic City broadcast, and all of that were fake....played in the studio, or something. They surely were unlucky them bay-californians

Quote
exilestones
Download link

[wetransfer.com]


RS 1994 LIVE - 941031 All Hallow's Eve TSP-CD-195-2.rar



[bootlegpedia.com]

Many thanks exilestones!

Thanks

THANKS, Quique-stone.

Quote
andrews27
THANKS, Quique-stone.

The credits and thanks must go to exilestones!