For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Greenblues
That's a very harsh judgement, cc. I don't know. What's your exaxt problem with TWFNO? Too "forced"? Too much soloing? I quite like the song. It's not as strong as Winter or Moonlight Mile which might have been the templates they tried to follow here but it's still an impressive collaboration IMO.

Quote
Faye Slith
we all know Keith speaks sh!t far too often...one day he wants to kinfe the guy, the next he loves him....lets get it straight - Jagger & Keith don't give a sh!t about him....they love money and screwed him big time...argue otherwise and you are kidding yourself.
Quote
Doxa
cc - I really enjoy your analysis in this case, and I agree you. I also think think that Taylor contributed most not in those moments when he was most to be heard (like TWFNO or CYHMN) but in those moments when he most contributed to the songs, and how they were shaped and felt like. I think GOATS HEAD SOAP is his moment of glory - that's when he really contributed (with his collaboration with other Mick) to the music of the Stones. In that album is that smooth, stylish Taylorish feeling all around. most apperent, of course, in "100 Years Ago" and "Winter".
That is also good point about the celabrated "Time Waits For No One". That is really quite forced output, and Taylor's guitar sounds like out-take or a thing not home with the rest. There is not Stones groove or cohesion to be heard at all - plus ít has one of the worst Jagger's vocals ever. With the flat note of "Ruby Tuesday" - you know: "She would never SAY..." - it is a wonder they ever got that one released, Just compare to "Winter", "Angie" or "Fool To Cry"...
- Doxa