Hello!
I just got this release, cover says that disc two consists of the two shows from Oct. 14th, 1973 in Rotterdam; track 1-6 first, 7-15 second show.
Well the first six songs are from the first show, but to my ears the remaining nine songs are neither from the first or second show of that day.
There is a boot that I don't have called "Keep Your Pussies Clean" (Dandelion),that has these last nine songs but from Oct. 13th! Can anybody confirm that disc two of the DAC release is in fact a reworking of the Dandelion cdr or tell me where track 7 to 15 are from??
Thanks in advance!

[www.boot-review.com]

Thanks Mitch!
But this does not really help, as the reviewer also believes in what is written on the cover, and I don't think the last nine songs are from Oct. 14th !

I've just downloaded this release myself from torrent. As far as I can tell, despite the review, is that the Rotterdam disc is the same as "Keep Your Pussy's Clean", which for me raises a new question. Which shows are these songs actually from? I always thought that the last nine songs on the disc were from Oct. 13 but this disc claims Oct. 14 2nd show. So while I'm more inclined to believe that the last nine songs are from Oct. 13, I'd like some definitive information if anybody could provide it.

The last nine tracks are indeed from 10/13.
I have audience tapes for both 10/14 shows and they are different from tracks 7-15 on this DAC disc.
Rank Stranger is right: The DAC disc is a copy of "Keep Your Pussies Clean" and the info on the cover is wrong.

By the way, the "Bootleg Encyclopedia" site is riddled with false and misleading info.

Thanks TornandFrayed. I figured the last nine songs on the disc were from 10/13 but I didn't have any complete recordings of the Rotterdam shows to check it against.

Does anybody know if the rest of the 10/13 show is available from this same source? Or is there just the 9 songs on "Keep Your Pussy's Clean"?

Thanks for your help folks !!

"By the way, the "Bootleg Encyclopedia" site is riddled with false and misleading info."

Then send in your corrections bigmouth...

gsparaco Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "By the way, the "Bootleg Encyclopedia" site is
> riddled with false and misleading info."
>
> Then send in your corrections bigmouth...

You´ll see pigs fly before I support a website that promotes the sale of crappy commercial bootlegs (some of which are made from tapes I circulated).

Oh, so that's your agenda. We see where you are really coming from. You are forbidden from reading my site. Only the Pure Of Heart can understand my site.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-10-24 22:52 by gsparaco.

Eh, what does the 'pure of heart' mean in this affair ? The ones who don't know anything about ROIOs ?
I like reading about new releases at that page - it's interesting, but there sure are a lot of mistakes there - it can't be denied

My "Pure of Heart" reference are for those who have an obvious agenda against silver boots. If they can't afford them, that is fine. Not everyone can. But that doesn't detract from those who do enjoy them.

"but there sure are a lot of mistakes there - it can't be denied"

Like?

gsparaco Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> My "Pure of Heart" reference are for those who
> have an obvious agenda against silver boots. If
> they can't afford them, that is fine. Not
> everyone can

Oh there are the occational great boot, which I like to pick up.

> "but there sure are a lot of mistakes there - it
> can't be denied"
>
> Like?

Why? Would it be corrected?

"Why? Would it be corrected?"

The website is a cooperative effort by a group of collectors. Top Rolling Stone collectors already are consulted, but anybody is invited to offer corrections, opinions, editorials, facts, etc. It's not just a vanity project for the authors involved. The vision is this to be an information warehouse for these releases, concerts and bands that we write about. So yes, if there are factual errors they will be corrected. We don't know everything, but at least we try...

OK that's nice info



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-10-24 23:32 by Erik_Snow.

gsparaco Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Oh, so that's your agenda. We see where you are
> really coming from. You are forbidden from
> reading my site.

Alright... this is pointless. time for Plan B:

"Alright... this is pointless."

What you need is discipline....

gsparaco Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> "Why? Would it be corrected?"
>
> The website is a cooperative effort by a group of
> collectors. Top Rolling Stone collectors already
> are consulted, ...

I'd trust Charlie Manson first, dude.

"The wonder of Jimi Hendrix was that he could stand up at all he was so pumped full of drugs." Patsy, Patsy Stone

Erik_Snow Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> ...but there sure are a lot of
> mistakes there - it can't be denied

Would you mind give an example (or maybe couple of examples)?

"I'd trust Charlie Manson first, dude."

He only reviews Beatles boots for the site...

Hello again!
In the meantime I was able to borrow the "Keep Your Pussies Clean" bootleg and indeed it is basically the same as the DAC release, so the info on the DAC cd is wrong; the entry in the "Bootleg Encyclopedia" has also been rewritten by gsparaco.

I listened to Birmingham last night, drinking Moet White Star Champagne. It rocks.