For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Spud
My point is simply that there probably aren't a large proprortion of folks from the Indian sub continent hanging around on these forums ;^)
In defence of the American guys around here... their presence on these pages indicates that they've at least acknowledged a world outside the US of A
...and as such are amongst the most enlightened of their countrymen ;^)
Quote
andrewmQuote
steveroganQuote
andrewm
With all due respect, everything you just mentioned, save the ABB opening night and the Pope's visit is baseball-related, which will mean nothing to most of the rest of the world. I'm in North America but I can accept that football(what we call soccer) is the most popular sport worldwide by a good distance. And how is Bush throwing out the first pitch epic or mythical? Doesn't someone of note do that at the beginning of every World Series?
Bush threw out the pitch in the first game of WS after 9/11. He did so to show the world that the US will not be intimidated by terrorism, even in the city in which much destruction occured. He nailed the throw, from the rubber atop the mound directly to the catcher symbolizing an unwavering unflappable leader to many new yorkers that night. Ever try throwing a "strike to catcher in from of a full hpuse at YS for a Ws game? No-oone hardley throws from the rubber. The commander in chief, METAPHORICALLY showed ther world we (the US) are not afraid of anything. As a quick note- Derek Jeter told the president that he "better not bounce it" for fear of booing from the crowd. An HBO special was made about the healing power of baseball around 9/11 and this event specifically was featured.As a NYer, baseball fan, and US citizen,I and many of ther US citizens feel the same way.Yes, that was a mythical event to say the least. Absolutely.Perhaps while in North America you can do a little research on the WS and the "throwing out the first pitch ceremonies". Someone of note does throw ouy yhe first pitch, but not from the rubber, not in a full bullet proof vest and certainly not the leader of the US only several days after we had been attacked,
My apologies, I forgot that the '01 World Series was shortly after 9/11. I clearly struck a nerve with you and had no intention of doing so. Again, my apologies. I stand by everything else in the post, though. There seems to be the assumption that baseball is closely followed worldwide and it just isn't. It's the "World" Series in name only. Doesn't make it any less great a sport, it just ain't the most popular.
Quote
EddieByword
Wembley.................but this is a pretty decent one too...........75,000 capacity
The Cardiff Millenium Stadium with sliding roof.........
And at dusk..................
From above.........
And inside.............................The Stones played there in 2006

Quote
steveroganQuote
andrewmQuote
steveroganQuote
andrewm
With all due respect, everything you just mentioned, save the ABB opening night and the Pope's visit is baseball-related, which will mean nothing to most of the rest of the world. I'm in North America but I can accept that football(what we call soccer) is the most popular sport worldwide by a good distance. And how is Bush throwing out the first pitch epic or mythical? Doesn't someone of note do that at the beginning of every World Series?
Bush threw out the pitch in the first game of WS after 9/11. He did so to show the world that the US will not be intimidated by terrorism, even in the city in which much destruction occured. He nailed the throw, from the rubber atop the mound directly to the catcher symbolizing an unwavering unflappable leader to many new yorkers that night. Ever try throwing a "strike to catcher in from of a full hpuse at YS for a Ws game? No-oone hardley throws from the rubber. The commander in chief, METAPHORICALLY showed ther world we (the US) are not afraid of anything. As a quick note- Derek Jeter told the president that he "better not bounce it" for fear of booing from the crowd. An HBO special was made about the healing power of baseball around 9/11 and this event specifically was featured.As a NYer, baseball fan, and US citizen,I and many of ther US citizens feel the same way.Yes, that was a mythical event to say the least. Absolutely.Perhaps while in North America you can do a little research on the WS and the "throwing out the first pitch ceremonies". Someone of note does throw ouy yhe first pitch, but not from the rubber, not in a full bullet proof vest and certainly not the leader of the US only several days after we had been attacked,
My apologies, I forgot that the '01 World Series was shortly after 9/11. I clearly struck a nerve with you and had no intention of doing so. Again, my apologies. I stand by everything else in the post, though. There seems to be the assumption that baseball is closely followed worldwide and it just isn't. It's the "World" Series in name only. Doesn't make it any less great a sport, it just ain't the most popular.
The OLD YS also hosted famous boxing matches concerts, the NY Football GIants played there as well a numeorus other cross cultural events- that's the OLD stadium th enew stadium is csostly ( over 1 billion dollar place, with little history). I understand BB is no the most popular sport in the world American football has overtaken it in popularity- I love football ( soccer) as it is called here. and would love to see a match at Old Trafford or Emirates. The Colliseum is probably the most famous arena in the world and as we know no major events are held there. No offense taken- have anice day while we wait out the hurricane here in NYC
Quote
EddieBywordQuote
andrewmQuote
steveroganQuote
andrewm
With all due respect, everything you just mentioned, save the ABB opening night and the Pope's visit is baseball-related, which will mean nothing to most of the rest of the world. I'm in North America but I can accept that football(what we call soccer) is the most popular sport worldwide by a good distance. And how is Bush throwing out the first pitch epic or mythical? Doesn't someone of note do that at the beginning of every World Series?
Bush threw out the pitch in the first game of WS after 9/11. He did so to show the world that the US will not be intimidated by terrorism, even in the city in which much destruction occured. He nailed the throw, from the rubber atop the mound directly to the catcher symbolizing an unwavering unflappable leader to many new yorkers that night. Ever try throwing a "strike to catcher in from of a full hpuse at YS for a Ws game? No-oone hardley throws from the rubber. The commander in chief, METAPHORICALLY showed ther world we (the US) are not afraid of anything. As a quick note- Derek Jeter told the president that he "better not bounce it" for fear of booing from the crowd. An HBO special was made about the healing power of baseball around 9/11 and this event specifically was featured.As a NYer, baseball fan, and US citizen,I and many of ther US citizens feel the same way.Yes, that was a mythical event to say the least. Absolutely.Perhaps while in North America you can do a little research on the WS and the "throwing out the first pitch ceremonies". Someone of note does throw ouy yhe first pitch, but not from the rubber, not in a full bullet proof vest and certainly not the leader of the US only several days after we had been attacked,
My apologies, I forgot that the '01 World Series was shortly after 9/11. I clearly struck a nerve with you and had no intention of doing so. Again, my apologies. I stand by everything else in the post, though. There seems to be the assumption that baseball is closely followed worldwide and it just isn't. It's the "World" Series in name only. Doesn't make it any less great a sport, it just ain't the most popular.
You're right..........other than this thread the only time I've ever heard anything about the 'World series' was from Jack Nicholson in One flew over the cuckoos nest in 1982 and even then I was wondering why it was called that......talk about a misnomer..
Quote
tattersQuote
Rev. Robert W.Quote
aslecs
The Polo Grounds!
Love it. Long before my time, but would kill to be able to have seen Willie--or Mel Ott or Bill Terry or Carl Hubbell--play there. I'd kill to have seen the Mets play there.
And yes, its historical significance easily eclipsed that of Yankee Stadium.
Meanwhile, I saw Giants Stadium listed. What a terrible, antiseptic place. Actually diminished any event held there.
It's historical significance certainly does not eclipse that of Yankee Stadium, but here's a cool clip of Jack Dempsey being knocked through the ropes by Luis Firpo. Polo Grounds, New York City, September 14, 1923. I completely agree with you about Giants Stadium. Awful, awful place.
Quote
Rev. Robert W.
It's great (for Yankee fans) that the Yanks won so many titles in Yankee Stadium--but how many of those are even memorable, much less truly historic?

Quote
EddieByword
Wembley.................but this is a pretty decent one too...........75,000 capacity
The Cardiff Millenium Stadium with sliding roof.........
And at dusk..................
From above.........
And inside.............................The Stones played there in 2006
Quote
Welsh Stone
Well the Millennium Stadium gets my vote, but maybe I'm biased! Hard to beat it for atmosphere or location, with it being bang in the middle of the city.
As for my favourite stadium, that has to be the Brewery Field in Bridgend, but I guess not many of you have heard of that!!Quote
EddieByword
Wembley.................but this is a pretty decent one too...........75,000 capacity
The Cardiff Millenium Stadium with sliding roof.........
From above.........
And inside.............................The Stones played there in 2006
.......I used to walk my dog past there many moons ago...........
..........



Quote
Gazza
Wembley - easy
Football is the most popular sport in the world, England is the home of the sport and the old stadium would be the most recognisable venue in the game. The FA Cup final is shown to a bigger worldwide audience than any annual sporting event
Maracana would certainly be second, I would imagine. The Nou Camp in Barcelona would be up there too. The Colosseum is a clever answer, although obviously its been out of use even longer than Wembley has!
Yankee Stadium would be the most well known American sports venue to anyone living outside North America but American sports dont have the same worldwide recognition that football has. I'd be surprised if its the top 10 most recognisable stadiums in the world to be honest.
The Olympic Stadiums in Athens and Berlin would be well known too..the latter being still more associated with Jesse Owens and the 1936 Olympics. Wimbledon Tennis Stadium and Lords Cricket Ground too
Most famous indoor arena would undoubtedly be Madison Square Garden, however.
Quote
tattersQuote
Gazza
Wembley - easy
Football is the most popular sport in the world, England is the home of the sport and the old stadium would be the most recognisable venue in the game. The FA Cup final is shown to a bigger worldwide audience than any annual sporting event
Maracana would certainly be second, I would imagine. The Nou Camp in Barcelona would be up there too. The Colosseum is a clever answer, although obviously its been out of use even longer than Wembley has!
Yankee Stadium would be the most well known American sports venue to anyone living outside North America but American sports dont have the same worldwide recognition that football has. I'd be surprised if its the top 10 most recognisable stadiums in the world to be honest.
The Olympic Stadiums in Athens and Berlin would be well known too..the latter being still more associated with Jesse Owens and the 1936 Olympics. Wimbledon Tennis Stadium and Lords Cricket Ground too
Most famous indoor arena would undoubtedly be Madison Square Garden, however.
Right. End of discussion.
Quote
RollingStonesFan
If I ask you, which is the most famous stadium in the world, what would you answer me?
I begin and answer my own qustion:
Maracana Stadium, Rio de Janiero

Quote
colonial
What stadiums would have the worse noise from overhead aircraft?




