Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-12-04 23:52 by satisfaction2.

ablett Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [www.museiciviciveneziani.it]%
> 20copertina.jpg


Totally love that Corbijn pic - Keef looks like an old Indian mystic - which as we saw the other day - isn't far from the truth - what, with the rain stick and all ;-)

CindyC Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Nice photo LOGIE.
>
> I know Keith looks a bit dirty in that photo, but
> I still find it pretty damn sexy. Anyone else
> think so?


I don't know about sexy (being a man myself and straight at that)but I often wondered about - given Keef's other habits of not bathing too much and wearing the same clothes for days on end - that he always seems rather well-shaven??

And always has, really. You don't see too many pix of him unshaven?? Not even back in "the bad old days"

satisfaction2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [home.arcor.de]

Hahahaha genius!

CindyC wrote: "I believe in Tony's book there was a mention of Mick T needing to get a plastic implant in his nose due to tissue loss from excessive snorting. One of the benefits of needles I suppose.;-)"
***********************

Thanks CindyC...that might be what I read. The Tony Sanchez book is really the only Stones book that I've read cover to cover...and I read it 20 yrs ago. It may very well have been Mick Taylor. or Keith? And as SSSOUL said...who's to say that Tony Sanchez is accurate.

Here's another nice shot of Keith......from the gray hair tour. (VDL or B2B?)

Sorry...not sure who shot this.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-12-05 00:02 by sweet neo con.

mofur Wrote:
> And always has, really. You don't see too many pix
> of him unshaven?? Not even back in "the bad old
> days"

Or ever with sideburns!?

JR64 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> You can find that photo in David Daltons book
> "Rolling Stones in their own words" published in
> 1980. Actually the first book i bought about The
> Stones


In which case I am happy to stand corrected!!

Many thanks JR64!!

> > It's probably Anita, Suki isn't that pretty.


Don't tell Brian.

LOGIE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> JR64 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > You can find that photo in David Daltons book
> > "Rolling Stones in their own words" published
> in
> > 1980. Actually the first book i bought about
> The
> > Stones
> In which case I am happy to stand corrected!!
>
> Many thanks JR64!!

No problemo. By the way, i´m new here so, hi everybody!

Hi JR, welcome to the board.

His Majesty Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> mofur Wrote:
> > And always has, really. You don't see too many
> pix
> > of him unshaven?? Not even back in "the bad old
> > days"
>
> Or ever with sideburns!?


Hmmm... I do think he had sideburns in the 60's - but it was hidden under his - then - massive hair ;-)

mofur Wrote:

> Hmmm... I do think he had sideburns in the 60's -
> but it was hidden under his - then - massive hair
> ;-)

I dont think I've seen any pics where his 'sideburns' hair goes past just above his ear lobe!?

-



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2008-11-16 12:44 by Erik_Snow.

LOGIE Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> My personal favourite is this one of Keith from
> Rolling Stone magazine, taken during the 1975
> TOTA. As far as I know, it didn't make it into any
> books or publications of the Rolling Stones,
> though I'd be more than happy to be proved wrong!
>
> [i88.photobucket.com]
> .jpg
>
> Photo by Annie Leibovitz.

this one is my new favorite. dreamy...

>> dont think I've seen any pics where his 'sideburns' hair goes past just above his ear lobe!? <<

watch Stones in the Park - as Mofur noted, Keith's hair is so long that the sideburns don't show too often,
but they're there, and they're serious.

satisfaction2 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> [home.arcor.de]
> e2.jpg

Priceless!

He was pretty unshaven at the Marquee Club 1971 !

Also pretty unshaven on the cover of the rolling stone, rolling stone. I want to see my picture on the cover of the rolling stone.....*singsalong*

open g, thanks great pics of course. Do you know from what year? 1982 right? He looks a little like he did in 1980-81 on theat close up, 1981 cloths, but with a red mark on his nose. And it doesnt look broken on that particular pic.

A swirling mass of gray and black and white


Manchester 10 August 1964 - London Express



ROCKMAN

LOL< RocKMAN, YOU'VE OUTDONE YOURSELF! (Sorry for caps but it fits my sentiment). That is perfect.

"...no longer shall you trudge 'cross my peaceful mind."

Go Chelsea...yeah was Keith the first to Mosh...?



ROCKMAN

LA FORUM Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> open g, thanks great pics of course. Do you know
> from what year? 1982 right? He looks a little like
> he did in 1980-81 on theat close up, 1981 cloths,
> but with a red mark on his nose. And it doesnt
> look broken on that particular pic.


Sorry, I would only be guessing, there are no hints in the writing.
I'm sure someone can answer this.
Miss sssoul, Rockman?

Luke33 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> He was pretty unshaven at the Marquee Club 1971 !


I did not say he was NEVER unshaven ;-) There are known exceptions to the rule

I've seen that famous photo of him - almost unconscious onstage, leaning against the PA, after having lost his boots somewhere...he's pretty unshaven there, too

My point was that a man who reputedly wears the same clothes for days and hardly - on his own account - bathes....it's extraordinary that he ALMOST always seem to be well shaven

After all - we gotta talk about SOMETHING while we wait for the next tour to be announced *lol*

>> Miss sssoul <<

i'll do my best, Open-G honey - with a bit of editing for clarity:
the RS cover was taken in 1980, as far as i know (Annie Leibowitz of course)
the close-up looks like 82 to me. the bottom one is from 77.

great shots - thanks for posting them.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-12-05 21:19 by with sssoul.

The Rolling Stone issue is from January 82. The pics could be from 81.

erikjjf Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The Rolling Stone issue is from January 82. The
> pics could be from 81.


Yes, Keith looks very alike as he did backstage in Hampton 81 BTW, just saw that one again, maybe even exactly the same.
The 3rd photo, isn't that from 77?

right right - sorry, i've edited my post since it wasn't clear.
i thought the question was about that close-up under the stage shot.

>>i'll do my best, Open-G honey - with a bit of editing for clarity:
the RS cover was taken in 1980, as far as i know (Annie Leibowitz of course)
the close-up looks like 82 to me. the bottom one is from 77. <<

Suddenly I remembered where I had seen the 4th picture before....

I think the 3rd picture is from 1977 (not sure though), while
the 4th one is definately from March 1980, same photo session as this





Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-12-07 04:56 by Erik_Snow.

March 1980? Hm, so the red dot on his nose could be the broken nose incident?