beast of burgk Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gecko Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > I have to say it once more though, I think
> Keith's
> > daughters are really ugly.
>
>
> Come on, man. If the Keith daughters are "ugly",
> what about most young women then? Not to speak of
> older... By the way, on the picture uploaded by
> only stones only the chick in the middle is
> actually made by Keith, but I don't know which of
> them, they look almost like siblings.

Keith's daughters aren't unattractive, but they aren't extraordinary either. The only reason anyone finds them more attractive than they actually are is because of some fascination with their father, The ROCKGOD Keith Richards. In reality, if their father was not Mr. Richards, I doubt they would get a fraction of the attention they do and most would not look twice if not for that fact. Admit it, you see better looking girls at your local mall or university. I know I do and on a daily basis, but I'm a woman and women's standards and tastes are usually much more discerning.

Keith's daughter certainly got the same way of standing as her pa...only female of course,
found this pic at RocksOff.





Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-10-03 00:03 by Erik_Snow.

Georgia May...is gonna be a wild one.....



ROCKMAN

The book cover with a person in a dive position? That does not even slightly look like a woman, plus you can't even see the face.

I love that group shot of Cindy, Tatjana, Stephanie, etc, the one that inspired the Freedom video for George Michael.

I saw Tatjana once in person, she was wandering around the Musee de l'Ongerie(sp?). She's stunning.

Rockman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Georgia May...is gonna be a wild one.....

I think so too. She's a cutie.

CowgirlInTheSand Wrote:
> Keith's daughters aren't unattractive, but they
> aren't extraordinary either. The only reason
> anyone finds them more attractive than they
> actually are is because of some fascination with
> their father, The ROCKGOD Keith Richards. In
> reality, if their father was not Mr. Richards, I
> doubt they would get a fraction of the attention
> they do and most would not look twice if not for
> that fact. Admit it, you see better looking girls
> at your local mall or university. I know I do and
> on a daily basis, but I'm a woman and women's
> standards and tastes are usually much more
> discerning.

Do I hear some jealousy in here ? It's a fact what you are saying and they are already makin' Zillions of Dollars with it (model contracts, cover shoots on Vogue etc.) without having done anything but being the daughters of... well you know who. That's both amazing and cruel at the same time and might be the reason for envy...but: I guess it's not always only nice to be JUST the daughter of KR....

In the words of Borat:

"Wahwahweewah!"

I don't think she was speaking out of jealousy. I personally think the Richards daughters are very pretty, however I have never seen them in person, so who knows. But I do think that in terms of what agencies look for in models, Theodora probably wouldn't have made it without her dad/mom's connections. I do think Alexandra has a better chance in the long run.

But seriously, Lizzie Jagger seems like a really sweet girl, but I wouldn't say she is super attractive (even in her fashion photos), yet she has a Lancome contract, and was in the Burberry ads. There is definitely a case of the Jagger mystique working overdrive in that case.

I guess I sort of take offense to the fact that because she is a girl, you assume she's jealous. You didn't call Lizard jealous when he said they were ugly.

CindyC Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> The book cover with a person in a dive position?
> That does not even slightly look like a woman,
> plus you can't even see the face.

NO, you low on caffine luv bug, a FLIP, not a DIVE. That's a muscular women, I think she was half Asian. You can't see her face on the cover but I believe there were more inside WITH face. He shot a ton of her on the beach. You NEVER just shoot one set-up + Ritts wasn't even famous yet - this was his first book.You doubtin' me love bug, come on, anybody that was vaguely involved with Fashion Photography at the time heard about it - it's a small community of heros and villians, talent and shallow ego, cool fools and merck jerks......
>
> I love that group shot of Cindy, Tatjana,
> Stephanie, etc, the one that inspired the Freedom
> video for George Michael.I saw Tatjana once in person,
> she was wandering around the Musee de l'Ongerie(sp?).
> She's stunning.

Yeah well that group shot was WAY into the height of his career. It was nice and well done but that was the period of the SUPER model and all that Sh*t. YOU DO NOT want models to think they're on the level of Meryl Streep - once you turn the ego's on, you can't turn them off...(Never could find the battery compartment to knock those batteries out-lol)

Jade Jagger is the hottest Stones child!!

CindyC Wrote:

> I guess I sort of take offense to the fact that
> because she is a girl, you assume she's jealous.
> You didn't call Lizard jealous when he said they
> were ugly.

Why offensive? Her words suggested that she is jealous (!) because they are the daughters of her famous father, but MY POINT is, that there is NO REASON to be jealous, because probably it's not always fun to be HIS daughter....

That's got nothing to do with women always being jealous or something....
I don't even think in such categories.

Cindy, you are a case of mislead political correctness.... :-)