For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Debra
For me John Lennon's death remans the biggesr lose and the most disturbing all the way around. .
Quote
pmk251
For me without a doubt, it is Lennon. He was a touchstone as I moved through life. He stated his musical formula: Tell the truth; make it rhyme; and give it a back beat. It sounds easy, but it isn't. And it does not translate to broad popular appeal. Few of his songs I consider fluff. Personally, he was one of the most interesting of the classic rock personalities. He had the courage to state where he was at at any point in his life. He may have sometimes been full of sh*t, but I never thought he was bullsh*tting me. He was a mass of contradictions: An often insecure egotist musical giant whose landscape became his soul. Ultimately that is where any artist of note
finds his muse. Fame, wealth, loneliness, love, family, the role of an artist in society...are all things he dealt with in spades. What do you do, what does it mean when you have everything? It is territory the Stones are not capable of exploring. As Keith said in the Chuck Berry movie: "There's no money in it." Hearing a Lennon interview left me scratching my head for days. He was honest and thoughtful. I never felt that way about a Jagger interview. Lennon's first solo album, the POB, is one of the most compelling albums ever made. This from "a Beatle." It's stunning.
Quote
keefriffhard4life
i think in order to fit this question it should be someone who was young enough to still make great music. i see people being named that were 55+ and at the end of their career. is that really a great loss to music or are we just sad they are gone?
Quote
The SicilianQuote
keefriffhard4life
i think in order to fit this question it should be someone who was young enough to still make great music. i see people being named that were 55+ and at the end of their career. is that really a great loss to music or are we just sad they are gone?
Dude, are you serious? The loss of an artist is both sad and a great loss regardless of age.
Is James Brown not important because he didn't die young?
Quote
Rockman
.........IKE
Quote
boston2006Quote
Rockman
.........IKE
Turner ??
Quote
Wry Cooter
It would seem lennon's best work was behind him, though of course his death is the most tragic circumstances. "Double Fantasy" is nice and I'm sure he would have come up with some more good stuff, but I don't feel his career was halted mid-sentence,
In that regard, the artists that left with the most promise ahead (IMO of course):
:
Hendrix without question first and foremost. Where he was taking music can only be fathomed, but the with an increasing Afrocentric influence and his ability I feel the best was ahead.
Otis -- Jesus, "Dock of the Bay" was his last song. Just beginning to hit his stride.
Jim Morrison -- because the Doors had previously released their best two albums -- "Morrison Hotel" and "LA Woman." I think they were on a run comparable to the Stones "Beggars Banquet" to "Exile." So I'm guessing we got cheated two classic LPs.
Duane Allman -- "Eat a Peach" shows where the Allmans were going -- lyrical, melodic, heartfelt, -- so Southern but not Southern Rock. And "Layla" for Duane's playing. Right as the flame was rising.
I'm not as familiar with Cobain and Jeff Buckley but it would seem they were cut way short. Now as to artists who were waylaid by drugs and alcohol and sins of the flesh, that is another matter....