Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Keith Richards avoids charge for lighting up in London
Posted by: boston2006 ()
Date: August 29, 2006 18:18

Associated Press
Monday, August 28, 2006 - Updated: 02:19 PM EST

LONDON - Keith Richards won’t be in trouble for allegedly smoking in Scotland.

The Rolling Stones guitarist had supposedly been seen by journalists lighting up a cigarette while performing in Glasgow. The city forbids smoking in enclosed public places.

But the city council said today that the stage at Hampden Park where the band performed is exempt from the regulations.

The council also said that it wasn’t clear if the journalists who’d reported the smoking had actually been at the concert.

Richards’ publicists have not commented.

Re: Keith Richards avoids charge for lighting up in London
Posted by: stonefan ()
Date: August 29, 2006 19:52

Can you imagine keith Richards with no cigarette on a stage or anywhere else ?

This man permanently lives and sleeps with a cigarette.

Keith with no fag would be like a terrorist with no bomb or a pirate with no hook or a bitch with no making up

it's beyond imagination

Re: Keith Richards avoids charge for lighting up in London
Posted by: Gazza ()
Date: August 29, 2006 20:25

the 'offence' took place in Glasgow - not London.

Re: Keith Richards avoids charge for lighting up in London
Posted by: Skink ()
Date: August 29, 2006 20:44

More free publicity.

Re: Keith Richards avoids charge for lighting up in London
Posted by: Stikkyfinger ()
Date: August 29, 2006 20:47

"The council also said that it wasn’t clear if the journalists who’d reported the smoking had actually been at the concert."

Since when do journalists make up stuff? smiling smiley

Rolling Stones Tribute

Play Rolling Stones

Re: Keith Richards avoids charge for lighting up in London
Posted by: Skink ()
Date: August 29, 2006 20:48

Ofcourse he smoked. He has been for the last 43 years and will be for who knows how long.

Re: Keith Richards avoids charge for lighting up in London
Posted by: wannaholdu ()
Date: August 29, 2006 20:50

Whew! That was a close one.

Re: Keith Richards avoids charge for lighting up in London
Posted by: Skink ()
Date: August 29, 2006 20:51

Yeah, imagine him getting fined!!

Re: Keith Richards avoids charge for lighting up in London
Posted by: turd ()
Date: August 29, 2006 20:51

One person who wasn't there reported it - 50,000 others who were, didn't give a flying f*ck.

Re: Keith Richards avoids charge for lighting up in London
Posted by: Skink ()
Date: August 29, 2006 20:52

Keith is one of the few people in this world that can make smoking look cool.

Re: Keith Richards avoids charge for lighting up in London
Posted by: bartman ()
Date: August 29, 2006 22:23

you've got the law and you've got Keith Richards....

Re: Keith Richards avoids charge for lighting up in London
Posted by: CindyC ()
Date: August 29, 2006 22:34

bartman Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> you've got the law and you've got Keith
> Richards....


But to live outside the law you must be honest.

Re: Keith Richards avoids charge for lighting up in London
Posted by: StonesTod ()
Date: August 29, 2006 22:44

Skink Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Keith is one of the few people in this world that
> can make smoking look cool.

didn't realize I was in such select company.



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 1763
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home