Re: Mick T's Guitars
Date: July 5, 2006 20:39
He Stranger,
Nice read! You sound a bit like Taylor's girlfriend from Groningen (I forgot her name, Marlies or something), but here's what I know:
-------------------------------------------------------
> In case you're interested Mathijs: He gave the Les
> Paul SG he owned to his brother-in-law (the
> producer Robin Millar), as a wedding present.
It might very possiblly true he gave a guitar to Robin Millar, but NOT the Bigsby SG he played from '68 until 71. This SG was stolen at Nellcote, as stated by Taylor (and Richards) himself in various interviews.
> Later on, another of his favourite Les Pauls ('58
> LP Standard, I think it was) was stolen on tour.
I know of one LP "stolen" on tour, and that was a '58 LP with Bigsby. It wasn't actualy stolen, Taylor had left it in a train in England in the early '90's.
> Also, two of Taylor's houses went up in flames,
> something like that might slightly change your
> perspective on the importance of material
> possessions.
It really doesn't matter what MY perspective is on material possesions. Anyhow, I am not interested in Taylor's personal live (nor in the personal lives of any of the other Stones), and (maybe therefore) I have never heard of fires at his house.
> Mathijs, it's all very well that you take an
> interest in what kind of guitars Keith and Mick T
> have played over the years, but for someone that
> doesn't know anything about the man's personal
> life you're making way too many assumptions.
Please read all the posts about guitars of the Stones -there is not one statement from me about the personal live of any of the Stones, except for the one about Taylor selling his guitars in the early 80's. I will get to that later on.
> Almost immediately after Mick T left the Stones,
> they cut him off from all the artist royalties
> generated by the records he helped to create while
> with the band. It was illegal what they did but
> that didn't matter to them.
> The Stones
> froze his assets and Taylor had to seek legal
> advice (heavy-weight lawyers with matching fees).
> So there
> were some serious legal issues with them acting
> like his entitlement to his 1/5 share of the
> royalties had suddenly ended.
First, the Stones never cut Taylor of from any royalties. Second, Taylor has never ever sued the Stones. Third, Taylor has no right to 1/5 of the royalties. Taylor has the right to 1/3 of 20% of the royalties of he songs he co-wrote (Ventilator Blues), and to this day get SENA royalties from the albums he plays on, which is not very much (SENA rights won't make you a rich man, contrary to writing royalties). It might be unbelievable, but if Charlie, Bill or Mick Taylor would have left the Stones in the mid-70's by all standard they wouldn't have left as rich as you and me might expect they would. For the non-writing members, the only real way to make money is (and still is for Wood and Watts) is touring.
> Despite the treatment he received from his old
> bandmates (and their business advisors), Taylor
> was still not broke.
> The second half of the 70's, Taylor worked with
> different people like Jack Bruce, Pierre Moerlen,
> John Phillips (Pay Pack and Follow album plus the
> score for movie The Man who Fell to the Earth,
> starring David Bowie).
It is widely known that after the failure with Jack Bruce Taylor became a heroin addicted recluse, hardly playing at all. For most of '76 to '79, Taylor was completely missing in action, with very, very sparse contributions. After his 1979 album failed to make any commercial succes, Taylor again went in hiding for 1980 (doing absolutely nothing!) and most of 1981, to return to the stage in October 1981 to do a short tour with Alvin Lee. There's many of stories about Taylor during the "missing years", how he spent months at home being totally addicted. Even Taylor has been quite frank in interviews about these years.
Taylor sold several of his guitars in late '80 or early '81. There's statements of various people who were around at the time confiming this story, among them Bill Wyman and Bob Dylan, as well as various widely known guitar traders (Bob Gruhn and Tom Wheeler for example). As the LP's he sold were very valuable at the time it is a quite known fact that Taylor sold them, and as the guitars are worth $250.000 each today, there's an entire family of collectors. One of the collectors (quite widely known as he has one of the largest LP's collections on the world) has one of the LP's of Taylor.
I have absolutely no clue on the financial position of Taylor, nor on his personal live. All I know that his live seems to go with ups and downs. Bill Wyman has stated that when Taylor visited him to play on his solo album in 1996 Taylor was completely down and out, and had sold all his equipment and was without any money at all. Wood told the press in 2002 that when Taylor visited the Stones in London Taylor mentioned that he was broke, and that he could use some money.
What's the point of this all? I personally really don't care about Taylor's personal live. He's a guitar god to me, and that's all that counts. The widely known reason why his Les Paul's dissapeared after 1980 was that he sold them as he was completely down and out, which I find very, very tragic for such a tremendous musician.
Mathijs