Hey Doc...nice website

jigsawp Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Well - there are only two weak Stonesalbums :
> Voodoo Lounge and A Bigger Bang!


Oh, an expert!

Without these albums they wouldn´t be here today.

By the way:

VL ***
ABB *****



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-04-24 16:47 by TooTough.

It must be the 2 albums I don´t listen to at all or just once a year:

Satanic (still has got 4 great songs!)

and (hm, I have to think)

Flashpoint! (all tracks except for Factory girl) were polished in the
studio. Yes, it´s a studio album!)

worst studio album??

easy - "got live if you want it!"

Dirty Work

Voodoo Lounge (although I do like The Worst and Love Is Strong)

Not a real big fan of B2B or Got Live If You Want It either.

Bridges to Babylon and A Bigger Bang.

Bridges to Babylon is a fantastic album. Far surpassing everything since Some Girls in both production and songwriting, as well as emotion. It was edgy and dangerous and different, that's why people on this board don't like it. It's the only album they have that won't sound dated 10 years from now. Even VL and ABB will sound dated soon. B2B sounds current and unique.

The weakest? Satanic and probably Dirty Work. Unless you count Keith's live albums.

Sorting Rolling Stones albums depending on quality is irrelevant. It is strictly a matter of opinion, and has nothing to do with information, and does not improve my knowledge of the band or their history. Therefore, I see no need to take part in this thread.

I'd say Dirty Work and Emotional Rescue.

Dirty Work is my favourite album since Some Girls, especially because of Hold Back, Dirty Work, Sleep Tonight, One Hit, Fight. Excellent rock'n roll!

some girls and aftermath

jumpinjackgreg Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Bridges to Babylon is a fantastic album. Far
> surpassing everything since Some Girls in both
> production and songwriting, as well as emotion. It
> was edgy and dangerous and different, that's why
> people on this board don't like it.

Thanks for informing me why I'm not that crazy about it. Funny, I thought it was because the songs weren't that good . . .but thanks for clearing that up.

Leonard Keringer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> some girls and aftermath


We have two of the most atmospheric albums here. Aftermath feels like a deep and dark journey into a strange afterlife. Some Girls is a sexy, moody tribute to glam rock almost. It's dirty.

Those are two wonderful albums, IMHO

Jumpin'JackFrash Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Leonard Keringer Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > some girls and aftermath
>
>
> We have two of the most atmospheric albums here.
> Aftermath feels like a deep and dark journey into
> a strange afterlife. Some Girls is a sexy, moody
> tribute to glam rock almost. It's dirty.
>
> Those are two wonderful albums, IMHO

just jokin around JJFrash.......of course they're two classics

Silver Blood Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Sorting Rolling Stones albums depending on quality
> is irrelevant. It is strictly a matter of opinion,
> and has nothing to do with information, and does
> not improve my knowledge of the band or their
> history. Therefore, I see no need to take part in
> this thread.


Then, why did you?

How about Some Exiles Banquet or December's Majesties Lounge?

I hadn't realized this was a classroom.

Leanord, stop winding people up. You naughty boy.

jagger50 Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Leanord, stop winding people up. You naughty boy.


me be muy malo

Me neither nikki.

StonesTod Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Silver Blood Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Sorting Rolling Stones albums depending on
> quality
> > is irrelevant. It is strictly a matter of
> opinion,
> > and has nothing to do with information, and
> does
> > not improve my knowledge of the band or their
> > history. Therefore, I see no need to take part
> in
> > this thread.
>
>
> Then, why did you?

To convince other individuals that sorting Rolling Stones albums depending on quality is irrelevant.

Leonard Keringer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> jagger50 Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Leanord, stop winding people up. You naughty
> boy.
>
>
> me be muy malo


Si si, claro!

Silver Blood Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> StonesTod Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Silver Blood Wrote:
> >
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> > -----
> > > Sorting Rolling Stones albums depending on
> > quality
> > > is irrelevant. It is strictly a matter of
> > opinion,
> > > and has nothing to do with information, and
> > does
> > > not improve my knowledge of the band or their
> > > history. Therefore, I see no need to take
> part
> > in
> > > this thread.
> >
> >
> > Then, why did you?
>
> To convince other individuals that sorting Rolling
> Stones albums depending on quality is irrelevant.

Ah, I see you're a newbie here. Welcome. In time you'll learn that everything that's discussed on this board is irrelevant.

Irrelevancy is a cognitive form of destruction.

Err, Silver Blood, this is not a purely informational site. It is a CHAT site - which, of course, means that opinions are going to be a major part of it.

Here's my opinion: you've come to the wrong place.

nikkibong Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Err, Silver Blood, this is not a purely
> informational site. It is a CHAT site - which, of
> course, means that opinions are going to be a
> major part of it.
>
> Here's my opinion: you've come to the wrong place.

Opinions are irrelevant.

This board ain't big enough for the both of us.

HaHaHa. Silver Blood, you're funny.

I'm trying to figure out which of our regular posters you are. I'm thinking StonesTod.

Question for you. Besides advancement, what else is relevant?

Silver Blood has been sent from the future to destroy Sarah Connor, but got sidetracked when he came to the IORR forum

Something tells me he's just giving us guff because he thinks it's funny

Oh no.. edit your post, Cindy!!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-04-24 21:40 by Reptile.