Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto Page: 12Next
Current Page: 1 of 2
The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: 3DTeafoe ()
Date: March 9, 2006 07:33



The Rolling Stones


This unretouched photo is autographed to "Goodie" by Jack Lewis.
(I'm guessing he's the piano player.)
Would that make him the original Jumpin' Jack?
If I'm not mistaken, this band was out of Brighton, England.
Photographer unknown.

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: StonesTod ()
Date: March 9, 2006 07:43

really bummed me out when they phased out the accordion....they were never really the same afterward

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: MicksBrain ()
Date: March 9, 2006 09:45

I bet they played "SWAY" at EVERY Show....

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: Adrian-L ()
Date: March 9, 2006 10:25

i see Chuck Leavel on keyboards, is doing the same old schtick....

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: Deathgod ()
Date: March 9, 2006 10:26

wonder if etix was charging $47.70 'convenience fees' per ticket then ...


Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: Adrian-L ()
Date: March 9, 2006 10:29

i'm not sure about Blondie in a top-hat (that's him pointing at Charlie, right?)
The baggy suit, suits Bobby, well though...
plenty of room for him to grow into it.

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: open-g ()
Date: March 9, 2006 12:07

I see they all ready had everything painted black in those days

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: Adrian-L ()
Date: March 9, 2006 13:44

even back then the boys had a nice, sparse 'B'- stage.

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: Koen ()
Date: March 9, 2006 13:46

Bobby Keys hasn't aged at all.

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: JumpingKentFlash ()
Date: March 9, 2006 14:02

Their setlists suck. grinning smiley

JumpingKentFlash

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: Adrian-L ()
Date: March 9, 2006 14:08

Where's Taylor?

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: Chris Fountain ()
Date: March 9, 2006 14:14




Bobby Keys does appear much younger in the pic. Amazing what age will do.


C

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: ablett ()
Date: March 9, 2006 14:26

Which ones got Vibrato?.....

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: kienan ()
Date: March 9, 2006 15:15

Charlie looks the same, only his hair has gone gray. Is that Keith in the right-center pointing at Charlie? He's starting to show his age!

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: Markdog ()
Date: March 9, 2006 15:36



Gurtrude Taylor replaced Betty Jones in 1940. Edith Wood replaced Gurtrude in late '45.

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: Lukester ()
Date: March 9, 2006 15:49

Gertrude? I thought that was Larry from the Three Stooges.

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: Reptile ()
Date: March 9, 2006 15:53

Is that a wig?

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: redrum ()
Date: March 9, 2006 16:55

Hey--thats a cool photo! I wonder if any of their recordings still exist? Probably on 78 RPM.

Charlie Watts replaced the pictured drummer 27 years later, in 1963.
The piano player is Bill Wayman's father (ha-ha!)

"I hope they don't think we're a rock n roll outfit"--1936.

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: Lukester ()
Date: March 9, 2006 17:12

Y'all help me out please, what the hell is that picture on the bass drum?

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: Adrian-L ()
Date: March 9, 2006 17:18

Lukester Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Y'all help me out please, what the hell is that
> picture on the bass drum?

its some dude with a big penis.
- the forerunner to the tongue logo

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: Lukester ()
Date: March 9, 2006 19:30

deleted by the duplication eradication police



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2006-03-09 20:50 by Lukester.

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: Lukester ()
Date: March 9, 2006 19:35

Adrian-L Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Lukester Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > Y'all help me out please, what the hell is
> that
> > picture on the bass drum?
>
> its some dude with a big penis.
> - the forerunner to the tongue logo


Thanks Adrian-L,
I'm glad I wasn't the only one that saw that.

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: J.J.Flash ()
Date: March 9, 2006 19:47

Charlie's good tonight- innit he?

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: Leonard Keringer ()
Date: March 9, 2006 20:20


from 1952.....this guy was a prolific sci-fi writer

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: ohnonotyouagain ()
Date: March 9, 2006 20:24

Leonard Keringer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> from 1952.....this guy was a prolific sci-fi
> writer


Was it about a strange group of beings from another galaxy who travelled to our planet to spread peace, love and music and bang groupies?

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: Leonard Keringer ()
Date: March 9, 2006 20:31

ohnonotyouagain Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Leonard Keringer Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
> > >
>
> >
>
> > from 1952.....this guy was a prolific
> sci-fi
> > writer
>
>
> Was it about a strange group of beings from
> another galaxy who travelled to our planet to
> spread peace, love and music and bang groupies?




Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: ohnonotyouagain ()
Date: March 9, 2006 20:41

Funny!

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: swsfo ()
Date: March 9, 2006 20:53

Its Only Rock 'n' Roll (but I like it!)....

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: open-g ()
Date: March 11, 2006 12:28

Leonard Keringer Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >
>
> from 1952.....this guy was a prolific sci-fi
> writer


wikipedia says its from '47 - but that's no hanging matter
did you read it?

Re: The Original Rolling Stones - 1936
Posted by: TooTough ()
Date: March 11, 2006 13:00


from 1920


from 1939


from 1914


Goto Page: 12Next
Current Page: 1 of 2


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 317
Record Number of Users: 184 on May 17, 2018 22:46
Record Number of Guests: 3948 on December 7, 2015 15:07

Previous page Next page First page IORR home