For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
ds1984
I think things have to be made back to their context.
Most people that are Rock 'N' roll fan are fan of Elvis.
Elvis'56 was a phenomenal singer.

Quote
Stoneage
I understand BV's remark though. It's a generational issue. When The Beatles broke through in the early 60s Elvis was already considered "old". At least for the teens of that era. That is how popular music works.
The most avid Elvis fans are usually since long retired now - in their mid/late 80s if they are still with us.
Quote
Happy Jack
The one thing that strikes me about the "Generational" divide if you will between Elvis and The Beatles or Stones is that Elvis was only born 5 years before John, and Ringo, and a year before Bill.
In fact when the Beatles and Stones and hit the scene in 1964 most of Elvis' fans were only in their mid-20s.
Quote
Kurt
EPIC is an amazing movie. It really shows Elvis at the height of popularity having fun and entertaining the masses. No dirt, just greatness.
Elvis
Presley
In
Concert
The rehearsal footage is even better than the actual concert footage! Fun movie.
Quote
bv
When Dave Matthews guested with The Stones, I was told he filled stadiums on his own, in USA. These days, with a more open market, and when Taylor Swift sell out Wembley Stadium a zillion times, things are different.

Quote
dmay
Wow. All these comments...how Elvis is still shaking up the culture. Don't mind the thread title change. It's the way it be.
Regarding a few things, Elvis did not serve in Korea while in the Army. He was stationed in Germany. It has been conjectured he was drafted and ended up in the Army as part of an effort to rein in rock'n'roll in the United States. Colonel Parker may have had some sway in regard to this. Take into account that it was the very late 1950s in the United States when they blacklisted Jerry Lee Lewis for his marrying his 13 year old cousin and late 50s/early 60s when Chuck Berry was busted. The elders of society were aghast at the boomer generation embracing the devils music and doing whatever to end it
. This is how we got Pat Boone covering Little Richard songs.
As for Elvis, I have a number of albums, outtakes, etc., of him. I highly recommend his "Elvis In Memphis" album as a great listen. The original album is best; the extended album good but y'all might wanna skip a few tunes. A great intro to him. I also recommend checking out these tunes for a taste of him:
Like A Baby
Money Honey
Lawdy Miss Clawdy
Fever
Crying In The Chapel
Suspicious Minds (long version)
Funny How Time Slips Away
Good time Charlie's Got The Blues
There are any number of great tunes by him many folks haven't heard. Y'all can cherry pick through his output to find things to like.
So, go see EPiC - it rocks - and pray the Stones do their own epic similar to this one.
Quote
RisingStone
I have been thinking of Elvis Presley.
Elvis was one of the biggest stars in the whole history of rock ‘n’ roll. An originator as well as archetypal rock star.
And he was the precursor of a rock ‘n’ roll rebel turned into a Vegas act, in a very literal sense of the words in his case.
When I started to listen to rock music in the early 70’s, he was already old school, much more so than The Beatles and The Rolling Stones. He seemed to belong to the ancient times, a yesterday’s star. The film, Elvis: That’s The Way It Is, became a big hit in Japan (it was released under the title, “Elvis On Stage”, over there), and there was an occasional radio friendly chart topper, e.g. Burning Love — for all that, Elvis in those days felt like a nostalgia act, a revival.
When he passed away in Summer 1977, Elvis was a half forgotten figure — at least in Japan and around me. He was forty-two, and being at that age in 1977 gave me an impression of a rock star who lived long, especially when he was compared to the members of the “27 Club”, Brian, Jimi, Janis and Jim, those who had left us earlier, and in much younger age than Elvis. The news was received as a blast from the past by many of us, old and young generations alike back in time.
Looking back from now, some forty-four years after his death, I feel how young he was — he was younger than me now by twenty years or so! Untimely even. In 2009, I put my hand on the 40th anniversary 2CD edition of Elvis In Memphis, his later-era masterpiece released in 1969, the year of Woodstock and Altamont. It was almost like an alt-country/Americana album that came decades earlier.
Quote
Maindefender
Just saw the movie……it goes without saying he was a force of nature. A master showman. And that band plus backup singers…woof! He was so intimate with them.
Probably wise he did movies during the first British Invasion. I have to see if there is a collection of songs from the post Germany movie period that would be cool to have.
There was a 20 second nod to the Stones and Jagger being the only artist that could hold a candle to Elvis……that’s speaks volumes
Quote
bvQuote
TIREDQuote
bv
I am 70+ and I live in Norway. Sure I have heard about Elvis, and may be he performed live in UK, I don’t know. But… did he tour the world, like Japan, Australia, South America snd Europe several times? None of my friends talk about Elvis.
I would not discredit Elvis, but may be he was more of a Las Vegas act and a record disc performer, I just don’t know any Elvis fans. So how does he rule?
I am surprised that you "of all people" don't realize how amazing Elvis Presley was and still is, considering the quality of his music and his live shows, not to mention the high standards he set. Unfortunately he never toured outside of North America, those were decisions made by a management he sadly was fully dependent on. If you get a chance, watch the new movie "EPiC" in a proper IMAX theater, most likely you too will agree that "Elvis still rules" (no sense in taking this literally, it's just an American idiom).
The title of this thread is "Elvis Still Rules". I am aware of his Las Vegas days, about his movies, about Graceland, and so on, I have been to Memphis. Also, I have been to Liverpool, but I would not say that "The Beatles still rules". I have all Beatles albums from Revolver and on, but no Elvis.
Why should I, "of all people", have a particular taste for music? I am an individual. I love the Stones. I love a lot of other performing acts, past and present. I just expressed my personal view. In my part of the world, Elvis is history. He may have been great, he many be historic, but still, so are The Beatles, and The Rolling Stones, and many more.

Quote
Big Al
Who else, here, would rather listen to prime Elvis than the so-called 'blues greats'; Muddy Waters, Howlin' Wolf; Elmore James and B.B. King, etc? Don't get me wrong; I do appreciate - and enjoy! - some blues music, but it simply doesn't resonate with me like rock 'n roll does: Elvis, Buddy Holly; Chuck Berry and Ricky Nelson.
Quote
DoxaQuote
Big Al
Who else, here, would rather listen to prime Elvis than the so-called 'blues greats'; Muddy Waters, Howlin' Wolf; Elmore James and B.B. King, etc? Don't get me wrong; I do appreciate - and enjoy! - some blues music, but it simply doesn't resonate with me like rock 'n roll does: Elvis, Buddy Holly; Chuck Berry and Ricky Nelson.
What is the point to ask something like that? I am sure here are people who like Abba or The Beatles or The Bee Gees or Beethoven more than they do of Muddy Waters. So what?
Sorry to hear that "so called 'blues greats'" do not resonate with you.
- Doxa
Quote
Big Al
Who else, here, would rather listen to prime Elvis than the so-called 'blues greats'; Muddy Waters, Howlin' Wolf; Elmore James and B.B. King, etc? Don't get me wrong; I do appreciate - and enjoy! - some blues music, but it simply doesn't resonate with me like rock 'n roll does: Elvis, Buddy Holly; Chuck Berry and Ricky Nelson.
Quote
Big AlQuote
DoxaQuote
Big Al
Who else, here, would rather listen to prime Elvis than the so-called 'blues greats'; Muddy Waters, Howlin' Wolf; Elmore James and B.B. King, etc? Don't get me wrong; I do appreciate - and enjoy! - some blues music, but it simply doesn't resonate with me like rock 'n roll does: Elvis, Buddy Holly; Chuck Berry and Ricky Nelson.
What is the point to ask something like that? I am sure here are people who like Abba or The Beatles or The Bee Gees or Beethoven more than they do of Muddy Waters. So what?
Sorry to hear that "so called 'blues greats'" do not resonate with you.
- Doxa
Okay, I shouldn't have typed 'so-called'! In essence, my primary point is that I prefer rock 'n roll to authentic blues music. I was merely wondering how many here shared my preference.
Quote
WitnessQuote
Big Al
Who else, here, would rather listen to prime Elvis than the so-called 'blues greats'; Muddy Waters, Howlin' Wolf; Elmore James and B.B. King, etc? Don't get me wrong; I do appreciate - and enjoy! - some blues music, but it simply doesn't resonate with me like rock 'n roll does: Elvis, Buddy Holly; Chuck Berry and Ricky Nelson.
As already said, I respect Elvis for his importance in the history of rock music. I have listened to my compilation with Elvis to a limited extent. I do not want to disparage Elvis.
But when you challenge: Elvis really does not interest or appeal to me personally. The 'blues greats' DO!