Tumbling Dice (taken from Stripped-single Wild Horses in Holland) is the best live performance of this song. Just like Gimme Shelter (also from Wild Horses single)... I like when they first rehearse it in the dressing room and then they paste the rest of song from a recording on stage after this.

If there is one complaint: On the original from EOMS the rhythm part is played almost constantly (keith part?). Keith never plays this rhythm anymore, just filling rhythms. Too bad, cause it's such a great guitar driven song!

Anyway, this live version is their best I know of.

As I've written before..........
This is the cd stones fans should have had " Then It's Completed"................

CD 1
1. Come On I (single) '63 1:81
2. I Want To Be Loved 1:51
3. Fortune Teller (withdrawn single )'63 2:10
4. I wanna Be Your Man I ( single )'63 1;42
5. Stoned 2:08
6. Bye Bye Johnnie I (from EP "The Rolling Stotm" )'64 2:11
7. Money / 2:34
8. Poison Ivy 2:36
9. Tell Me, Baby (from LP " Rest Of The Best") '84 1:56 ,
10. I Can't Be Satisfield (from Lp "No.2" ) '64 3:2a
11. I've Been Loving You To Long (ham LP " Collector's Only " ) '80 2:82
12. Time Is On My Side (from LP "Nr.2" ) '64 2•
13. 19th. Nervous Breakdown i (single) '66 3:57
14. Sad day ( flipside US ) 3:01
15. Paint It, Black / ( single ) '66 S:4S
16. Long Long While ( flipshle UK) 2:Q0
17. Have You Seen Your Mother, Baby / ( single ) '66
18. Who's Driving Your Plane 3:12
19. Let's spend The Night Together I (single) '67
20. Ruby Tuesday 3:11
21. My Girl / (from LP "Flowers") '67 2:42
22. Ride On, Baby / 2:56
23. Sitting On A Fence 3;06
24. We Love You ( single ) '67 4:38 25. Dandelion 3:35
26. Jumpin' Jack Flash / (single) '68 3:40
27. Child a The Moon 3:08

CD 2
1. Honky tonk Woman (single)'69 3:02
2. @#$%& Blues* (from the LP " Rest Of The Best ")'83 03 :29
3. Let It Rock (live Leeds 13.3.71-flipside of single Brown Sugar/Bitch)'71
4. Through The Lonely Nights (flipside of single"It's Only Rock'n Roll ")'74
5. Everything is Turning To Gold (from LP "Sucking In The Seventies")'81 04:00
6. When The Whip Comes Down (live 6.7.78- from LP " Sucking In The Seventies ") o4:26
7. Beast OF Burden (live -Chicago 25.11.81- Tlipside of single "Going To A Go Go") '82
8. I Think I'm Going Mad (flipside of single "She Was Hot")'84 04:20
9. Fancy Man Blues ( flipside of single "Mixed Emotions") '89 04:57
10. Cook Cook Blues (flipside of single "Rock and a Hard Place")'89 04:23
11. wish I'd Never Met You (flipsie of single 'Terrifying")'90
12. High Wire (7 inch version -single)'91 3:45
13. 2000 Light Years From Home (live Barcelona 13.9.81)
14. I Just Wanna Make Love To You (live London 8.7.90 -from CD single '°Highwire Play With Fire")'81 4:09
15. Play With Fire( live Clemson 26.11.89)
16. Sex Drive ( from CD Flashpoint )'91 5:07
17. Harlem Shufle(live Tokyo -27.2.91-single)'91 4:49
18. Undercover Of The Night (live Atlantic City 19.12.89) 4:32
19. Tumblin' Dice / (live London 24.9.90 -from CD single "Jumpin Jack Flesh/Street Fighting Man-)'91 4:24

CD 3
1. Street Fighting Man ( live London 23.08.90 )
2. The Storm (from CD single "Love Is Strong/So Young")'94
3. So Young
4. Jump On Top Of Me (from CD single "You Got Me Rocking" )'94
5. I'm Gonna Drive (from CD single " Out Of Tears/Sparks Will Fly')'94
6. I Go Wild ( live Miami, Florida on November 25 -from CD single " I Go Wild " - studio verson)'94
7. Honest I Do (soundtrack -"Hope Floats" -from "Stripped" session )'95
8. Black Limousine (live -from CD single "Like A Rolling Stone/All Down The Line" )'95
9. All Down The Line (live)
10. Tumbling Dice (live -from CD Single "Wild Horses/Live With MelGimmie Shelter" )'96
11. Live With Me(live)
12. Gimmie Shelter (live)
13. Anyway You Look At It (from CD single "Saint Of Me")'96
14. Don't Stop (single)'02
15. Stealing My Heart (from CD "Forty Licks" as tracks 16 and 17)'02
16. Keys To Your Love
17. Losing My Touch

and.... THEN IT'S COMPLETED

HighwireC Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Ok, what are rarities?
>
> Official rarities must have been released (on
> vinyl, tapes, DVD or CD), nowerdays hard to find
> or rare in the setlists or never heard by a big
> crowd. To release such stuff is a little marketing
> to open eyes and ears for the big Stones cataloge
> and to catch new fans. Such rarities-releases will
> never satisfy hardcore fans and collectors.

none of the songs that have previously been released on live albums or compilations are "hard to find" as they're all currently available. ""Sucking in the 70's" for example was only reissued on CD earlier this year

Additionally, "Stripped" sold something like 3.5 million copies (a very high amount for a live record). Re-releasing a song from that album on a 'Rarities" package makes no sense - especially as the albums that most of these previously released songs appeared will have sold far more copies than "Rarities" will.

The album title is a complete misnomer. It should have been called "Sampler"

I suggest you nick it and not buy it. Starbucks used to sell these cute little magnets w/their coffee blend logos on them. Fair enough; but there was a separate magnet that WASN'T for sale that listed the magnets and their prices. I nicked that from a Starbucks in 1993 and have never even felt a wisp of guilt.

Not only that, but Starbucks product is inconsistent from store to store and it's supposed to be like McDonald's -- a quarter pounder w/cheese is supposed to be the same in Bejing and Miami -- and McDonald's succeeds where Starbucks fails. Also, McDonald employees don't act like they're special. I mean, Starbucks employees are coffee jerks, they can drop the frikkin attitude.

"The wonder of Jimi Hendrix was that he could stand up at all he was so pumped full of drugs." Patsy, Patsy Stone

Who is NOT disappointed with Rarities? I haven't even bought it yet though I'll get round to it - probably when it's in the summer sales.

Who selects and approves these things? It's a decent enough set but most of it is not hard to come by and not therefore rare.

You can download it from the usenet newsgroups...

cc

REALLY I CAN NOT UNDERSTAND WHY IF ALL OF YOU ARE DISAPPOINTED WITH RARITIES CD, YOU BUY IT. WE ARE INFORMATED ABOUT SONGS IN CD BEFORE BUY IT IT, SO WHY YOU BUY IT IF YOU DONT LIKE IT ???.
I AM NOT DISAPPOINTED WITH THIS CD IN FACT I LOVE IT.

MARIO Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> REALLY I CAN NOT UNDERSTAND WHY IF ALL OF YOU ARE
> DISAPPOINTED WITH RARITIES CD, YOU BUY IT. WE ARE
> INFORMATED ABOUT SONGS IN CD BEFORE BUY IT IT, SO
> WHY YOU BUY IT IF YOU DONT LIKE IT ???.
> I AM NOT DISAPPOINTED WITH THIS CD IN FACT I LOVE
> IT.


YES YOU RIGHT ARE! THERE IS ALSO ROLLING STONES RARITIES TOILET PAPER TO BUY IT. YES I LIKE IT TO!

I certainly don't like it. When the release was announced I thought it was a golden opportunity for The Stones to make up for live licks and to restore some faith in the possibility that one day they were going to catalogize their music, maybe share some previously unreleased (live) material and care about their legacy.

It's like Gazza said: sampler would would have been a better name. Rarities smells like genuine disinterest in the Stones camp.

MARIO Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> REALLY I CAN NOT UNDERSTAND WHY IF ALL OF YOU ARE
> DISAPPOINTED WITH RARITIES CD, YOU BUY IT. WE ARE
> INFORMATED ABOUT SONGS IN CD BEFORE BUY IT IT, SO
> WHY YOU BUY IT IF YOU DONT LIKE IT ???.
> I AM NOT DISAPPOINTED WITH THIS CD IN FACT I LOVE
> IT.

YES RIGHT YOU COPMLIETLY!!
IF YOU DON"T BY EVERYTHING YOU NOT FAN!!!

barbabang Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> YES RIGHT YOU COPMLIETLY!!
> IF YOU DON"T BY EVERYTHING YOU NOT FAN!!!

SORRY YOU NOT GOOD FAN! IT IS COMPLIETLLY YUOU BAD FAN OF STONES!
>

Why is it so important for you to give Mario a hard time, just because a few words was spelled wrong?
What the big deal. I got a lot of mistakes too.
Whats so bad about someone liking Rarities?

<<<<SIDONIA WROTE:
<<<<"YES YOU RIGHT ARE! THERE IS ALSO ROLLING STONES RARITIES TOILET PAPER TO <<<<<BUY IT. YES I LIKE IT TO!

REALLY YOU UNDERSTAND NOTHING. I WANT ONLY TO SAY THAT IF YOU DONT LIKE THAT CD, JUST DONT BUY IT. I CAN NOT UNDERTAND PEOPLE THAT KNOWS THAT RARITIES WILL DONT LIKE IT AND BUY IT, IT IS WORSE THAT BUY PAPER TOILET THAT YOU HAVE.

SI SIDONIA EL INGLES NO ES MI IDIOMA Y YO LO HABLO MUY MAL Y ADEMAS AL ESCRIBIRLO DEPRISA LO HAGO PEOR. AHORA TE ESCRIBO EN ESPAÑOL PARA HACERLO BIEN.
ERES UN IMBECIL.

Erik_Snow Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Why is it so important for you to give Mario a
> hard time, just because a few words was spelled
> wrong?
> What the big deal. I got a lot of mistakes too.
> Whats so bad about someone liking Rarities?


ANY NEW CD FROM STONES IS GOOD THING!
WHY YOU THINK THAT CD IS BAD.

SORRY SIDONIA, THE LAS MAIL IS NOT FOR YOU.

Gazza Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------

>
> The album title is a complete misnomer. It should
> have been called "Sampler"


hmmm, Gazza, Rarities surely is not a "Hit Sampler"and it's not a "Real Rarities" for hardcore fans, but there is some rare and some "obscure" stuff on this CD.

BTW: Can The Rolling Stones ever release a CD that will satisfy all of us? Look at the Bigger Bang diskussions here on IORR: This song is weak, that song is bad, there are to much songs on ABB and why didn't they Under The Radar?

All the things The Rolling Stones will do is wrong for some of us.

I never said and I'll never say this "Rarities" will be my personal favorit, I'm a little disappointed because they didn't remix Through The Loneley Nights, it seems more a demoversion than a finished track.

But what I say: This Rarities-CD gives us a new view. Nobody on this board wouldn't really have released such a "Sampler", right? ;-)


IORR, But I Like It, Yes, I Do!

BTW: Real Platinum Hardcore Stonesfans are very, very happy with their very exciting an rare Fanclub-DVD they've shot for only a hundred Dollars ... ;-)







Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2005-12-19 00:52 by HighwireC.

The only thing ggod to come of Rarities is TTLN and LIR. My single version of each of these was crackling.....Where is "honest I do" the live versions of 2000 light years or play with fire instead of the retreads from stripped....

HighwireC Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> Gazza Wrote:
> --------------------------------------------------
> -----
>
> >
> > The album title is a complete misnomer. It
> should
> > have been called "Sampler"
>
>
> hmmm, Gazza, Rarities surely is not a "Hit
> Sampler"and it's not a "Real Rarities" for
> hardcore fans, but there is some rare and some
> "obscure" stuff on this CD.

never mentioned the word 'hit', in fairness but the album fails as a concept on all levels for the reasons you've hinted at. Its neither an album of rarities, nor is it a compilation of songs from albums. So, its basically nothing.
>
> BTW: Can The Rolling Stones ever release a CD that
> will satisfy all of us? Look at the Bigger Bang
> diskussions here on IORR: This song is weak, that
> song is bad, there are to much songs on ABB and
> why didn't they Under The Radar?
>
> All the things The Rolling Stones will do is wrong
> for some of us.

maybe but thats going to be the case for anything they (or anyone) has ever done. There are people here who dont rate Exile or Some Girls very highly, and there are others for whom the Stones basically didnt exist prior to 1968.

think we're all happy enough that they're still making new music. Even if some people find the need to find more to criticise about that new music than they do to praise it
>
> I never said and I'll never say this "Rarities"
> will be my personal favorit, I'm a little
> disappointed because they didn't remix Through The
> Loneley Nights, it seems more a demoversion than a
> finished track.
>
> But what I say: This Rarities-CD gives us a new
> view. Nobody on this board wouldn't really have
> released such a "Sampler", right? ;-)

maybe, but what I do know is that every single person on this board could have compiled a 80 minute CD of non-album rarities (ie, previously released songs) from the period from 1971 onwards which would have been more worthy of the "Rarities" title than this mess of a release.

The version of BoB is hopeless. Turgid, overflanged guitars, tempo not right, sounds like a bad cover band. Now the version on Stripped Companion, thats the boy!

Oily.

i think the problems with "rarities" is the fact, that a couple of its songs aren´t rarities at all (for the details see other postings), nor it is a real sampler, because some songs are actually rare stuff. i say it´s neither fish nor meat. a compliation made without passion and love for detail!

Wandering spirt is right: i say it´s neither fish nor meat. a compliation made without passion and love for detail!

You forgot to add ,and just made for the money. All of us loyal fans deserve a better effort than this. Someone in the Stones camp could do a little homework and come up with something really special.In the last couple of weeks,we have seen countless selections from the fans right from this site .They have taken the time to contribute alot of great stuff. We thank them all. Mick and management should take notice and reflect!

In my opinion, the title should have been "B-sides" or "Flip sides" or something like that. With the following track listing:

Fancy Man Blues
All Down The Line (Live 95)
Undercover Of The Night (Live 89)
Beast Of Burden (Live 81)
Anyway You Look At It
Jump On Top Of Me
So Young
Wish I'd Never Met You
Cook Cook Blues
Think I'm Going Mad
Through The Lonely Nights
Black Limousine (Live 95)
Let It Rock (Live 71)
The Storm
I'm Gonna Drive
Gimme Shelter (Live 95)

I think whats most disturbing from this release is that it is the second 'product' issued under the Rolling Stones name in the last year ("Live Licks" being the other) where its quite obvious that the Rolling Stones themselves have been so disinterested that none of them have listened to the finished record (or bothered to help in compiling the tracks for it) before authorizing its release

I cant believe for a second that any of the 4 band members could have listened to the finished version of Live Licks, because surely at least one of them would have noticed the abomination that is "Rocks Off" on that release and demanded it be re-edited

Similarly, I find it hard to believe that they would be so clueless as to assemble a collection of songs like this under the name "Rarities" when so many of the selections are easily available on albums already. It seems their only input is to approve the erasing of any reference to Wyman on both the sleevenotes and photos used.

For the second time in a year, they have put their name to a release in which its quite evident they had zero interest. Years ago when Decca released albums where the band had no interest or input, they had enough pride in their art to take out full page ads. disowning the product as 'inferior'and not worthy of their name. Nowadays, they seem happy to go along with any old money-making, amateurish crap that their record label puts out. Not a good sign

@Gazza,

You have a jpeg of any of those advertisements you speak about?

No, but I think theyve been reproduced in a book or two at some point

They're from the early 70's after the Stones left Decca. When Decca started repackaging their old material with albums like "Stone Age" etc, the band responded by taking out ads. in the NME, Melody Maker, etc, disowning it and urging their fans not to buy it.

Fully agree with you Gazza.I tend more and more to believe that while they are still alive and kicking ( making albums and touring) they are unable to concentrate on their legacy.On top of it, it seems that Keith has no longer interest in spending nights and days in the mixing room making sure that they deliver the right product to the fans.What has happened to Rocks off on Live licks is the proof that none of them has listened to the record before the release.Would not have happened 10 years ago!

Gazza Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> No, but I think theyve been reproduced in a book
> or two at some point
>

Yeah, the one against Stone Age is in Roy Carr's book from the 70s.

It isn't a great release, but a quite good one. I would prefer more blues tracks. The long versions of "Miss You" and "Mixed Emotions" and the track "Dance pt. 2" aren't necessary in my opinion. "Beast of Burden" (live) and "Anyway You Look at It" are the highlights. I heard "Anyway" for the first time, it is simply an uncovered gem of our band.