Quote
1962
2 days: 10 million on YT

Quote
matxil

Quote
maumau
I was refreshed too hearing Mick speak like that about his songwriting and the band output.

I wonder, though, if there is on earth an artist that would openly confess in a PR event to write trying to guess what the majority of the audience might like

The big question for me about Angry is: where is the "unmapped territory" that Mick is willing so bad to adventure in that the 'conservative' Keith can't tolerate, to the point they need years and in studio mediators to get an album finished.

At least this is how we hear the story through the grapevine

Is there an ounce of "experiment" in Angry? question both to Mick that talks about "trying different things" and Keith that gets angry with him and "his" trendy producers.

All this time and fuss and walls hit to get an "ok/good/great" Stones tune in Hyperstones' style.

Hypestones style that has been perfectly translated in pictures in the video with the band through the eras lipsynching the song

Preordered the record and looking forward to find out more

The sound and the chorus of Angry have a modern ring to it. The riff and the verses are more old-school Stones. Maybe that's the sort of compromise you're hinting at?

Quote
BFR
I can’t believe how many people are scandalized by this video on a Rolling Stones fan forum The Stones are known for being overtly sexual in every way from their lyrics, to Mick’s on stage wardrobe and dance moves (to say nothing of his numerous sexual dalliances!!!), to the long line of women who have danced on stage and in their videos…everything about them is sexy! Hell, their emblem is a lascivious mouth with a lapping tongue!!

There is no nudity in the video, not even simulated sex! Just a scantily clad woman dancing by herself in a car. She looks sexy but anyone that’s ever seen Euphoria has seen a lot more of her body than is shown in this video. Sydney is a beautiful woman who is fully aware of her public image and has not only embraced it, but has become wildly popular for her provocative roles. Anyone who sees her as degraded or objectified is projecting.

Quote
BFR
I can’t believe how many people are scandalized by this video on a Rolling Stones fan forum The Stones are known for being overtly sexual in every way from their lyrics, to Mick’s on stage wardrobe and dance moves (to say nothing of his numerous sexual dalliances!!!), to the long line of women who have danced on stage and in their videos…everything about them is sexy! Hell, their emblem is a lascivious mouth with a lapping tongue!!

There is no nudity in the video, not even simulated sex! Just a scantily clad woman dancing by herself in a car. She looks sexy but anyone that’s ever seen Euphoria has seen a lot more of her body than is shown in this video. Sydney is a beautiful woman who is fully aware of her public image and has not only embraced it, but has become wildly popular for her provocative roles. Anyone who sees her as degraded or objectified is projecting.

Quote
BFR
I can’t believe how many people are scandalized by this video on a Rolling Stones fan forum The Stones are known for being overtly sexual in every way from their lyrics, to Mick’s on stage wardrobe and dance moves (to say nothing of his numerous sexual dalliances!!!), to the long line of women who have danced on stage and in their videos…everything about them is sexy! Hell, their emblem is a lascivious mouth with a lapping tongue!!

There is no nudity in the video, not even simulated sex! Just a scantily clad woman dancing by herself in a car. She looks sexy but anyone that’s ever seen Euphoria has seen a lot more of her body than is shown in this video. Sydney is a beautiful woman who is fully aware of her public image and has not only embraced it, but has become wildly popular for her provocative roles. Anyone who sees her as degraded or objectified is projecting.

Quote
VoodooLounge13
Still streaming!!! Been streaming alllllllllllllllllllllllllllll day when not in a zoom meeting! Will go all night again too!!!!

Quote
bisonvodka

Quote
1962
2 days: 10 million on YT

Brenda has good weekend.

Quote
Bastion

Quote
VoodooLounge13
Still streaming!!! Been streaming alllllllllllllllllllllllllllll day when not in a zoom meeting! Will go all night again too!!!!

Torture

Quote
RisingStone
How do I feel the “hot chick” bit for the Angry video? So clichéd! Been there done that. So many times. So obsolete.

This is 2023. Not 1972. They are now seventy and eighty-something. I wish the boys moved on.

But that’s the Stones for you, after all.

Quote
BFR
I can’t believe how many people are scandalized by this video on a Rolling Stones fan forum The Stones are known for being overtly sexual in every way from their lyrics, to Mick’s on stage wardrobe and dance moves (to say nothing of his numerous sexual dalliances!!!), to the long line of women who have danced on stage and in their videos…everything about them is sexy! Hell, their emblem is a lascivious mouth with a lapping tongue!!

There is no nudity in the video, not even simulated sex! Just a scantily clad woman dancing by herself in a car. She looks sexy but anyone that’s ever seen Euphoria has seen a lot more of her body than is shown in this video. Sydney is a beautiful woman who is fully aware of her public image and has not only embraced it, but has become wildly popular for her provocative roles. Anyone who sees her as degraded or objectified is projecting.

Quote
TIRED

Quote
BFR
I can’t believe how many people are scandalized by this video on a Rolling Stones fan forum The Stones are known for being overtly sexual in every way from their lyrics, to Mick’s on stage wardrobe and dance moves (to say nothing of his numerous sexual dalliances!!!), to the long line of women who have danced on stage and in their videos…everything about them is sexy! Hell, their emblem is a lascivious mouth with a lapping tongue!!

There is no nudity in the video, not even simulated sex! Just a scantily clad woman dancing by herself in a car. She looks sexy but anyone that’s ever seen Euphoria has seen a lot more of her body than is shown in this video. Sydney is a beautiful woman who is fully aware of her public image and has not only embraced it, but has become wildly popular for her provocative roles. Anyone who sees her as degraded or objectified is projecting.

Thank-you BFR, I couldn't have said it better myself.

I guess this video and the various reactions brought to surface yet again a "new" kind of divide within populations and apparently also within the Stones fan community.

This divide may be a geographical issue or a generational one but most likely it is an intellectual one. On one hand you have the unbiased viewers, instinctively and consciously free thinkers, faithful to their core beliefs while keeping them immune from the constant external manipulation attempts. This fraction has no problem whatsoever with the "Angry" video, in fact they would love to see a lot more of this kind. On the other hand you have the, let's say "moulded generation" whose principles and priorities have been irreversibly polluted by overblown sexism issues, #metoo, diversity utopia and an ocean of fake morals so blue they can't even recognize its phoney existence. Representatives of this second group are indeed a nuisance, especially when they try to gain members from the first group using artificial arguments spiting human nature. At the same time I feel sorry for them, going insecurely through life asking themselves "Am I allowed to like this?", "Is it OK to laugh at this joke?", "What will my friends think if they see I am enjoying this?". Paradoxically do they keep standing in the way of their own pleasure and entertainment, building their own mental cell, even seeking comfort within. In the context of Rolling Stones music and in a room full of devoted fans, that attitude has the smell not only of betrayal but even worse so: of complete misunderstanding.

Quote
TIRED

Quote
BFR
I can’t believe how many people are scandalized by this video on a Rolling Stones fan forum The Stones are known for being overtly sexual in every way from their lyrics, to Mick’s on stage wardrobe and dance moves (to say nothing of his numerous sexual dalliances!!!), to the long line of women who have danced on stage and in their videos…everything about them is sexy! Hell, their emblem is a lascivious mouth with a lapping tongue!!

There is no nudity in the video, not even simulated sex! Just a scantily clad woman dancing by herself in a car. She looks sexy but anyone that’s ever seen Euphoria has seen a lot more of her body than is shown in this video. Sydney is a beautiful woman who is fully aware of her public image and has not only embraced it, but has become wildly popular for her provocative roles. Anyone who sees her as degraded or objectified is projecting.

Thank-you BFR, I couldn't have said it better myself.

I guess this video and the various reactions brought to surface yet again a "new" kind of divide within populations and apparently also within the Stones fan community.

This divide may be a geographical issue or a generational one but most likely it is an intellectual one. On one hand you have the unbiased viewers, instinctively and consciously free thinkers, faithful to their core beliefs while keeping them immune from the constant external manipulation attempts. This fraction has no problem whatsoever with the "Angry" video, in fact they would love to see a lot more of this kind. On the other hand you have the, let's say "moulded generation" whose principles and priorities have been irreversibly polluted by overblown sexism issues, #metoo, diversity utopia and an ocean of fake morals so blue they can't even recognize its phoney existence. Representatives of this second group are indeed a nuisance, especially when they try to gain members from the first group using artificial arguments spiting human nature. At the same time I feel sorry for them, going insecurely through life asking themselves "Am I allowed to like this?", "Is it OK to laugh at this joke?", "What will my friends think if they see I am enjoying this?". Paradoxically do they keep standing in the way of their own pleasure and entertainment, building their own mental cell, even seeking comfort within. In the context of Rolling Stones music and in a room full of devoted fans, that attitude has the smell not only of betrayal but even worse so: of complete misunderstanding.

Quote
treaclefingers

Quote
TIRED

Quote
BFR
I can’t believe how many people are scandalized by this video on a Rolling Stones fan forum The Stones are known for being overtly sexual in every way from their lyrics, to Mick’s on stage wardrobe and dance moves (to say nothing of his numerous sexual dalliances!!!), to the long line of women who have danced on stage and in their videos…everything about them is sexy! Hell, their emblem is a lascivious mouth with a lapping tongue!!

There is no nudity in the video, not even simulated sex! Just a scantily clad woman dancing by herself in a car. She looks sexy but anyone that’s ever seen Euphoria has seen a lot more of her body than is shown in this video. Sydney is a beautiful woman who is fully aware of her public image and has not only embraced it, but has become wildly popular for her provocative roles. Anyone who sees her as degraded or objectified is projecting.

Thank-you BFR, I couldn't have said it better myself.

I guess this video and the various reactions brought to surface yet again a "new" kind of divide within populations and apparently also within the Stones fan community.

This divide may be a geographical issue or a generational one but most likely it is an intellectual one. On one hand you have the unbiased viewers, instinctively and consciously free thinkers, faithful to their core beliefs while keeping them immune from the constant external manipulation attempts. This fraction has no problem whatsoever with the "Angry" video, in fact they would love to see a lot more of this kind. On the other hand you have the, let's say "moulded generation" whose principles and priorities have been irreversibly polluted by overblown sexism issues, #metoo, diversity utopia and an ocean of fake morals so blue they can't even recognize its phoney existence. Representatives of this second group are indeed a nuisance, especially when they try to gain members from the first group using artificial arguments spiting human nature. At the same time I feel sorry for them, going insecurely through life asking themselves "Am I allowed to like this?", "Is it OK to laugh at this joke?", "What will my friends think if they see I am enjoying this?". Paradoxically do they keep standing in the way of their own pleasure and entertainment, building their own mental cell, even seeking comfort within. In the context of Rolling Stones music and in a room full of devoted fans, that attitude has the smell not only of betrayal but even worse so: of complete misunderstanding.

Hey, I like you, like the video. But why in the ever-livin' F*CK would you make this political?

I'm frankly TIRED of this.

Quote
TIRED

Quote
BFR
I can’t believe how many people are scandalized by this video on a Rolling Stones fan forum The Stones are known for being overtly sexual in every way from their lyrics, to Mick’s on stage wardrobe and dance moves (to say nothing of his numerous sexual dalliances!!!), to the long line of women who have danced on stage and in their videos…everything about them is sexy! Hell, their emblem is a lascivious mouth with a lapping tongue!!

There is no nudity in the video, not even simulated sex! Just a scantily clad woman dancing by herself in a car. She looks sexy but anyone that’s ever seen Euphoria has seen a lot more of her body than is shown in this video. Sydney is a beautiful woman who is fully aware of her public image and has not only embraced it, but has become wildly popular for her provocative roles. Anyone who sees her as degraded or objectified is projecting.

Thank-you BFR, I couldn't have said it better myself.

I guess this video and the various reactions brought to surface yet again a "new" kind of divide within populations and apparently also within the Stones fan community.

This divide may be a geographical issue or a generational one but most likely it is an intellectual one. On one hand you have the unbiased viewers, instinctively and consciously free thinkers, faithful to their core beliefs while keeping them immune from the constant external manipulation attempts. This fraction has no problem whatsoever with the "Angry" video, in fact they would love to see a lot more of this kind. On the other hand you have the, let's say "moulded generation" whose principles and priorities have been irreversibly polluted by overblown sexism issues, #metoo, diversity utopia and an ocean of fake morals so blue they can't even recognize its phoney existence. Representatives of this second group are indeed a nuisance, especially when they try to gain members from the first group using artificial arguments spiting human nature. At the same time I feel sorry for them, going insecurely through life asking themselves "Am I allowed to like this?", "Is it OK to laugh at this joke?", "What will my friends think if they see I am enjoying this?". Paradoxically do they keep standing in the way of their own pleasure and entertainment, building their own mental cell, even seeking comfort within. In the context of Rolling Stones music and in a room full of devoted fans, that attitude has the smell not only of betrayal but even worse so: of complete misunderstanding.

Quote
bakersfield

Quote
TIRED

Quote
BFR
I can’t believe how many people are scandalized by this video on a Rolling Stones fan forum The Stones are known for being overtly sexual in every way from their lyrics, to Mick’s on stage wardrobe and dance moves (to say nothing of his numerous sexual dalliances!!!), to the long line of women who have danced on stage and in their videos…everything about them is sexy! Hell, their emblem is a lascivious mouth with a lapping tongue!!

There is no nudity in the video, not even simulated sex! Just a scantily clad woman dancing by herself in a car. She looks sexy but anyone that’s ever seen Euphoria has seen a lot more of her body than is shown in this video. Sydney is a beautiful woman who is fully aware of her public image and has not only embraced it, but has become wildly popular for her provocative roles. Anyone who sees her as degraded or objectified is projecting.

Thank-you BFR, I couldn't have said it better myself.

I guess this video and the various reactions brought to surface yet again a "new" kind of divide within populations and apparently also within the Stones fan community.

This divide may be a geographical issue or a generational one but most likely it is an intellectual one. On one hand you have the unbiased viewers, instinctively and consciously free thinkers, faithful to their core beliefs while keeping them immune from the constant external manipulation attempts. This fraction has no problem whatsoever with the "Angry" video, in fact they would love to see a lot more of this kind. On the other hand you have the, let's say "moulded generation" whose principles and priorities have been irreversibly polluted by overblown sexism issues, #metoo, diversity utopia and an ocean of fake morals so blue they can't even recognize its phoney existence. Representatives of this second group are indeed a nuisance, especially when they try to gain members from the first group using artificial arguments spiting human nature. At the same time I feel sorry for them, going insecurely through life asking themselves "Am I allowed to like this?", "Is it OK to laugh at this joke?", "What will my friends think if they see I am enjoying this?". Paradoxically do they keep standing in the way of their own pleasure and entertainment, building their own mental cell, even seeking comfort within. In the context of Rolling Stones music and in a room full of devoted fans, that attitude has the smell not only of betrayal but even worse so: of complete misunderstanding.

You seem to claim that you are 'unbiased' and 'true to your core beliefs' and anyone who disagrees with you is being 'manipulated'. That kind of thinking is how nations become divided. I disagree with you but I don't doubt your integrity.

Quote
Jimmy C
11 Million views on YouTube, what is everyone seeing on Spotify for number of streams? I see about 257K but it doesn't look like my desktop Spotify is updating so maybe it's way higher.

Quote
gostonesforever
Listen to The Rolling Stones - Angry - Played Backwards! And sounds pretty good as well :.)

Quote
maumau

Quote
Jimmy C
11 Million views on YouTube, what is everyone seeing on Spotify for number of streams? I see about 257K but it doesn't look like my desktop Spotify is updating so maybe it's way higher.

I see 719k