For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
So trueQuote
dcba
if you read Chet Flippo's book about the 75-81 years you'll notice Wenner and his rag constantly stabbed the band in the back.
Jagger even called him a "@#$%&".
I guess they made amends for the (wonderful) 1995 MJ interview led by Wenner.
Quote
TheGreekSo trueQuote
dcba
if you read Chet Flippo's book about the 75-81 years you'll notice Wenner and his rag constantly stabbed the band in the back.
Jagger even called him a "@#$%&".
I guess they made amends for the (wonderful) 1995 MJ interview led by Wenner.
Quote
dcba
if you read Chet Flippo's book about the 75-81 years you'll notice Wenner and his rag constantly stabbed the band in the back.
Jagger even called him a "@#$%&".
I guess they made amends for the (wonderful) 1995 MJ interview led by Wenner.
Quote
treaclefingers
The review was bitchy, but it wasn't far off the mark. Some Girls is a great album, but it's no EOMS
Quote
dcbaQuote
treaclefingers
The review was bitchy, but it wasn't far off the mark. Some Girls is a great album, but it's no EOMS
Well what caused Jagger's furor was the double talk by Wenner.
Begging for an "all access" pass for Flippo on the 78 tour while a bit later okaying a negative review of the SG album by another RS journo. Coherence anyone?
You have to be a little dumb or twisted to let that happen, right?
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
dcbaQuote
treaclefingers
The review was bitchy, but it wasn't far off the mark. Some Girls is a great album, but it's no EOMS
Well what caused Jagger's furor was the double talk by Wenner.
Begging for an "all access" pass for Flippo on the 78 tour while a bit later okaying a negative review of the SG album by another RS journo. Coherence anyone?
You have to be a little dumb or twisted to let that happen, right?
OK, playing devil's advocacy here...just because you get an 'all access' pass shouldn't mean that you are now 'bought' by the band, and are obliged to giving glowing reviews. That ain't right.
On the other hand, I think the review itself was not the best and Jagger was probably right at accusing them for being bitchy.
But giving access to journalists shouldn't guarantee glowing reviews...that's 'fraudish'.
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
treaclefingersQuote
dcbaQuote
treaclefingers
The review was bitchy, but it wasn't far off the mark. Some Girls is a great album, but it's no EOMS
Well what caused Jagger's furor was the double talk by Wenner.
Begging for an "all access" pass for Flippo on the 78 tour while a bit later okaying a negative review of the SG album by another RS journo. Coherence anyone?
You have to be a little dumb or twisted to let that happen, right?
OK, playing devil's advocacy here...just because you get an 'all access' pass shouldn't mean that you are now 'bought' by the band, and are obliged to giving glowing reviews. That ain't right.
On the other hand, I think the review itself was not the best and Jagger was probably right at accusing them for being bitchy.
But giving access to journalists shouldn't guarantee glowing reviews...that's 'fraudish'.
Mick's stance might've been there's no need to be that way, just be less so.
Nevertheless, a very strange time for The Rolling Stones - and to be so upset over one magazine... very telling or just... bitchy?
Quote
bye bye johnny
"I would love for people to read this book and see how important the [rock 'n' roll] generation was,"
Quote
dcbaQuote
bye bye johnny
"I would love for people to read this book and see how important the [rock 'n' roll] generation was,"
It's too late! It's dying and young people don't care one bit for the "legendary" 60's (sorry Jann).