For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
StonedRambler
If it sounds good, who cares? (Well, the audiophiles obviously...)
Quote
kovach
At some point you'd have to think the sampling rate is beyond what the human ear can comprehend.
Quote
IrixQuote
kovach
At some point you'd have to think the sampling rate is beyond what the human ear can comprehend.
The sampling-rate of HiRes-files is not only about frequencies - HiRes sounds also more detailed, transparent and spacious. And 2.8MHz/1bit DSD has nothing to do with bats ....
Not by MFSL, but: the 2016 RS Mono-Box and the 2018 RS Vinyl-Box 1971-2016 are based on digital HiRes-files - [TheAudiophileMan.com] , [www.AbbeyRoad.com] .
Quote
ds1984
Hi Res Sound "PLAYBACK" compared to standard CD quality only allow to get ultra frequencies that are out of audible range and to feature louder theorical capability (also known as dynamic).
Quote
IrixQuote
ds1984
Hi Res Sound "PLAYBACK" compared to standard CD quality only allow to get ultra frequencies that are out of audible range and to feature louder theorical capability (also known as dynamic).
I'm listening since almost 10 years to HiRes-Music via HighEnd-Headphones and cannot confirm this often mentioned 'for bats only' theory.
I've often made A/B-comparisons between CD & HiRes (same mix of the same release) and while frequencies were the same, HiRes sounded more detailed, transparent and spacious. CD sounds more compact.
Quote
ds1984
The problem is not the mix but the mastering.