For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Hairball
Interesting that while Mick was working on this ridiculous dud of a movie, Keith was working on the highly excellent Main Offender.
I recall seeing Freejack in a theater, and it was doomed from the start mostly due to the terrible acting skills of both Mick and Emilio Estevez - they should have called it Upchuck.
Quote
retired_dogQuote
Hairball
Interesting that while Mick was working on this ridiculous dud of a movie, Keith was working on the highly excellent Main Offender.
I recall seeing Freejack in a theater, and it was doomed from the start mostly due to the terrible acting skills of both Mick and Emilio Estevez - they should have called it Upchuck.
Why you always feel the need to turn almost very thread into a Keith vs. Mick battle is beyond me. Guess it's a psychological thingy.
Quote
Doxa
I recall seeing it once (I guess from a rented VHS), but I don't recall about anything else than it being pretty bad and boring. But I am not a fan of those type of films generally, so I don't really know how it rates in its genre.
Of Mick's performance (of course, the only reason why I wanted to see it), I only recall his cool face. Not much California smile or other face expressions there.
Perhaps I should give it a second try some day. Once in every 30 years doesn't hurt that much.
Hmm... You live and learn. I always thought in the ever-lasting teenager soap opera Mick vs. Keith, the rational comparison from those days is WANDERING SPIRIT vs. MAIN OFFENDER. But now I see that it is FREEJACK vs MAIN OFFENDER. A good move, since the latter battle sounds more even (I am thinking about giving to MAIN OFFENDER a second try after 30 years as well, since I heard there is even a re-issue coming up... I am very big-hearted and open-minded nowadays, you see).
- Doxa