this is wild

[music.msn.com]

he's out of his head baby!

My friend in Cambodia used to get drunk with him.

wow! a musician in trouble for child molestation. sounds familiar?

hee hee

J.J.Flash Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> wow! a musician in trouble for child molestation.
> sounds familiar?
>
> hee hee


Glitter has been found guilty of possesion of child porn.
The other one you referring to has been declared not guilty over all counts.

Huge difference there.

Oow!

Yes, everyone found "not guilty" didn't do the crime...

Absurd statement

o.j. is innocent too!
and robert blake


you nut bowiestone

bowie is guilty...of a bad post.

>> "Yes, everyone found "not guilty" didn't do the crime...

Absurd statement"


So by this circular reasoning one can safely assume that if one is found "not guilty" that they are obviously "guilty"?

And you call his statement absurd?

kyle m

Have you ever lent somebody $20 and never seen them again? It was probably worth it.

-



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2007-12-22 05:26 by cirrhosis.

cirrhosis, you are right. Same here; title of the thread alone is priceless: gary Glitter and Vietnam??? LOL!! Damn! That pompadour must surely stick out in Hanoi; they should find him easi.ly.
When I did click on the link I thought for a minute that the photo of the wizard from harry Potter on the right was supposed to be Glitter. "Glitter"...gimme a break, LOL

Man!.....You know you're @#$%& Hard Core when you get friggin' "permanently expelled from Cambodia" !!!

monkey man Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >> "Yes, everyone found "not guilty" didn't
> do the crime...
>
> Absurd statement"
>
>
> So by this circular reasoning one can safely
> assume that if one is found "not guilty" that they
> are obviously "guilty"?
>
> And you call his statement absurd?
>
> kyle m
>
> Have you ever lent somebody $20 and never seen
> them again? It was probably worth it.

Thank you. When someone is found not guilty he at least deserves the benefit of the doubt by the general public. The prosecutor tried for 15 years to bring him to court and what did that 15 years of research gave him: nothing. And that prosecutor wanted him in jail really bad... it says a lot IMHO.
There just was no evidence at all. It's not because he's weird that he's a criminal.

Smooth criminal perhaps????

I read the story abour Glitter at the weekend and to be honest it aint that funny. By all accounts he can also be extridited back to the UK cause he hasn't been signing the sex offenders register.

Sad sad sad

monkey man Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> >> "Yes, everyone found "not guilty" didn't
> do the crime...
>
> Absurd statement"
>
>
> So by this circular reasoning one can safely
> assume that if one is found "not guilty" that they
> are obviously "guilty"?
>

Actually, it's not a binary; there are 3 basic findings possible:

Guilty,
Not Guilty, and
Innocent

A "not guilty" verdict does not mean that the defendant is innocent, only that there is not enough evidence to prove him or her to be guilty. Big difference, ask OJ.

So in fact, it's not unusual for a defendent to have committed a crime even while he or she is found "not guilty" because of a lack of evidence, a technicality, or an incompetent jury, prosecutor, or judicial system.

Yeah, I think Gary Glitter is guilty....of killing Brian Jones. And O.J Simpson was his partner in crime. This calls for the ultimate punishment...
Best Wishes.

What the hell is a Gary Glitter ??

The Glitter Twins.....Gary and his own personal demon

I can honestly say that I've never heard of the guy before reading the article. Any of his music that which a Stones fans would appreciate?

yeah rock and roll part 2. it's played at every nba stadium.you'd know it if u heard it.

Edith Grove Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> I can honestly say that I've never heard of the
> guy before reading the article. Any of his music
> that which a Stones fans would appreciate?


No. He was the bad side of glamrock (the good side was Bowie, T Rex).

I wish I had lent Monkey Man $20...I might be a good investment...if I never got it back...

J.J.Flash Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> yeah rock and roll part 2. it's played at every
> nba stadium.you'd know it if u heard it.


It's known as the "HEY" song, because those are the sole lyrics in the song; everyone knows it.