For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Topi
In France, concerts and events with more than 5000 people before May 31 have already been postponed TBD. For example the Queen & Adam Lambert show that was scheduled for May 26:
Quote
daspyknows
cancellation
The Austin-based event, which attracts hundreds of thousands of attendees
Quote
swimtothemoon
Hmm the SXSW conference and festival was cancelled on relatively short notice.
It was due to begin a week from now. Sounds like the city, in this case being
Austin, must declare a disaster or “state of emergency” prior to the cancellation.
From what I read, from others who have posted above, this procedure is important
for insurance reasons. In terms of the Stones concerts across the country this may
indicate that any postponements or cancellations would be up to each city and
possibly not giving more than a week for notice.
If this is the case than it’s not good news for those of us traveling to several
shows. Hotel reservations can be cancelled. However air reservations usually can not be cancelled, without a fee, unless you purchase cancellation insurance.
Hope you're right but would feel more confident if the tour started in July tbh.Quote
OneHourPhoto
Apples vs Anvils
SXSW is a 2 week event attracting 400,000 people from all over the world which brings in 400million dollars with multiple events each day all over Austin
A single concert is the tinest of a tiny blip on the radar attended by 90%-95% locals that will sleeping in their own bed after the show. With minimal impact. A city is not going to care to declare a State of Emergency in order to cancel a concert.
Quote
OneHourPhoto
A single concert is the tinest of a tiny blip on the radar attended by 90%-95% locals that will sleeping in their own bed after the show. With minimal impact. A city is not going to care to declare a State of Emergency in order to cancel a concert.
Quote
DeanGoodmanQuote
OneHourPhoto
A single concert is the tinest of a tiny blip on the radar attended by 90%-95% locals that will sleeping in their own bed after the show. With minimal impact. A city is not going to care to declare a State of Emergency in order to cancel a concert.
We're not talking single concerts, though. The Stones aren't the only band touring this summer. Justin Bieber and Kenny Chesney begin stadium tours about the same time, visiting the same venues. Then you've got a Pearl Jam tour beginning next week ...
Quote
artedm
Justin Bieber just downgraded his stadium shows into arenas due to “unforeseen circumstances” (which is a decades-old industry term for “not selling”)
Quote
MisterDDDDHope you're right but would feel more confident if the tour started in July tbh.Quote
OneHourPhoto
Apples vs Anvils
SXSW is a 2 week event attracting 400,000 people from all over the world which brings in 400million dollars with multiple events each day all over Austin
A single concert is the tinest of a tiny blip on the radar attended by 90%-95% locals that will sleeping in their own bed after the show. With minimal impact. A city is not going to care to declare a State of Emergency in order to cancel a concert.
If a city or State has already declared a State of Emergency, such as Washington . California and Maryland have, then cancelling a large event, even one where most sleep in their own beds, is not as tiny a blip as you think imo. A food handler infected with the virus and finding out after for example would trigger thousands of tests etc. Hoping for the best of course, but these shows aren't the tiniest of tiny blips.
Quote
MisterDDDDHope you're right but would feel more confident if the tour started in July tbh.Quote
OneHourPhoto
Apples vs Anvils
SXSW is a 2 week event attracting 400,000 people from all over the world which brings in 400million dollars with multiple events each day all over Austin
A single concert is the tinest of a tiny blip on the radar attended by 90%-95% locals that will sleeping in their own bed after the show. With minimal impact. A city is not going to care to declare a State of Emergency in order to cancel a concert.
If a city or State has already declared a State of Emergency, such as Washington . California and Maryland have, then cancelling a large event, even one where most sleep in their own beds, is not as tiny a blip as you think imo. A food handler infected with the virus and finding out after for example would trigger thousands of tests etc. Hoping for the best of course, but these shows aren't the tiniest of tiny blips.
These are still just singular events in places that are hundreds, if not thousands of miles from each other all across the countryQuote
DeanGoodmanQuote
OneHourPhoto
A single concert is the tinest of a tiny blip on the radar attended by 90%-95% locals that will sleeping in their own bed after the show. With minimal impact. A city is not going to care to declare a State of Emergency in order to cancel a concert.
We're not talking single concerts, though. The Stones aren't the only band touring this summer. Justin Bieber and Kenny Chesney begin stadium tours about the same time, visiting the same venues. Then you've got a Pearl Jam tour beginning next week ...
Quote
OneHourPhoto
Besides being the right thing to do, the SWSX promoters placed a tremendous amount of pressure on local officials to cancel the events as it is such a mammoth event with people coming from all over the world and people/companies spending hundreds of millions of dollars in the local economy. It was for hopes of financial recovery from the official cancellation and for future goodwill PR.
Quote
DeanGoodmanQuote
OneHourPhoto
Besides being the right thing to do, the SWSX promoters placed a tremendous amount of pressure on local officials to cancel the events as it is such a mammoth event with people coming from all over the world and people/companies spending hundreds of millions of dollars in the local economy. It was for hopes of financial recovery from the official cancellation and for future goodwill PR.
Yeah, not sure about "putting pressure." The promoters' hands are tied. They cannot cancel until there's an official directive from the authorities, e.g. a state of emergency. That's because their insurance does not cover pandemics. So their only option is to wait to be shut down by the authorities. This triggers the force majeure clause in their insurance, which covers their contracts with artists.
This will be template going forward. So with regard to the Stones and all other artists and events, you can assume the promoters have no choice but to proceed as usual UNLESS the mayor/sheriff/governor, etc. decrees otherwise. (Which will probably be the case.) Unfortunately these could be quite last-minute decisions, and obviously on a case-by-case basis, which would throw a huge spanner into the whole tour budget - for the Stones and for us.
Quote
OneHourPhotoQuote
swimtothemoon
Hmm the SXSW conference and festival was cancelled on relatively short notice.
It was due to begin a week from now. Sounds like the city, in this case being
Austin, must declare a disaster or “state of emergency” prior to the cancellation.
From what I read, from others who have posted above, this procedure is important
for insurance reasons. In terms of the Stones concerts across the country this may
indicate that any postponements or cancellations would be up to each city and
possibly not giving more than a week for notice.
If this is the case than it’s not good news for those of us traveling to several
shows. Hotel reservations can be cancelled. However air reservations usually can not be cancelled, without a fee, unless you purchase cancellation insurance.
Apples vs Anvils
SXSW is a 2 week event attracting 400,000 people from all over the world which brings in 400million dollars with multiple events each day all over Austin
A single concert is the tinest of a tiny blip on the radar attended by 90%-95% locals that will sleeping in their own bed after the show. With minimal impact. A city is not going to care to declare a State of Emergency in order to cancel a concert.
Quote
MisterDDDDHope you're right but would feel more confident if the tour started in July tbh.Quote
OneHourPhoto
Apples vs Anvils
SXSW is a 2 week event attracting 400,000 people from all over the world which brings in 400million dollars with multiple events each day all over Austin
A single concert is the tinest of a tiny blip on the radar attended by 90%-95% locals that will sleeping in their own bed after the show. With minimal impact. A city is not going to care to declare a State of Emergency in order to cancel a concert.
If a city or State has already declared a State of Emergency, such as Washington . California and Maryland have, then cancelling a large event, even one where most sleep in their own beds, is not as tiny a blip as you think imo. A food handler infected with the virus and finding out after for example would trigger thousands of tests etc. Hoping for the best of course, but these shows aren't the tiniest of tiny blips.
Quote
daspyknows
That's exactly what happened with a vendor at the Sea XFL game. Still a ow risk but thats what is happening.
Well aware of the clause and above is exactly to the comment I made to what I was told from people close to SWSXQuote
DeanGoodmanQuote
OneHourPhoto
Besides being the right thing to do, the SWSX promoters placed a tremendous amount of pressure on local officials to cancel the events as it is such a mammoth event with people coming from all over the world and people/companies spending hundreds of millions of dollars in the local economy. It was for hopes of financial recovery from the official cancellation and for future goodwill PR.
Yeah, not sure about "putting pressure." The promoters' hands are tied. They cannot cancel until there's an official directive from the authorities, e.g. a state of emergency. That's because their insurance does not cover pandemics. So their only option is to wait to be shut down by the authorities. This triggers the force majeure clause in their insurance, which covers their contracts with artists.
Calling for what?Quote
daspyknowsQuote
OneHourPhotoQuote
swimtothemoon
Hmm the SXSW conference and festival was cancelled on relatively short notice.
It was due to begin a week from now. Sounds like the city, in this case being
Austin, must declare a disaster or “state of emergency” prior to the cancellation.
From what I read, from others who have posted above, this procedure is important
for insurance reasons. In terms of the Stones concerts across the country this may
indicate that any postponements or cancellations would be up to each city and
possibly not giving more than a week for notice.
If this is the case than it’s not good news for those of us traveling to several
shows. Hotel reservations can be cancelled. However air reservations usually can not be cancelled, without a fee, unless you purchase cancellation insurance.
Apples vs Anvils
SXSW is a 2 week event attracting 400,000 people from all over the world which brings in 400million dollars with multiple events each day all over Austin
A single concert is the tinest of a tiny blip on the radar attended by 90%-95% locals that will sleeping in their own bed after the show. With minimal impact. A city is not going to care to declare a State of Emergency in order to cancel a concert.
Really? SF mayor calling for that right now.