Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto Page: PreviousFirst...3435363738394041424344
Current Page: 44 of 44
Re: Brian Jones talks
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: April 28, 2025 10:09



Milan 1967 .......



ROCKMAN

Re: Brian Jones talks
Posted by: Swayed1967 ()
Date: April 28, 2025 10:09

Quote
Rockman

They put that monkey on a train.

Re: Brian Jones talks
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: April 28, 2025 10:18

...now now be nice ....



ROCKMAN

Re: Brian Jones talks
Posted by: Swayed1967 ()
Date: April 28, 2025 10:22

Quote
Rockman
...now now be nice ....

In the photo, he's clearly playing 'No Expectations.' I thought My comment was poignantly apropos. Keep up, man.

Re: Brian Jones talks
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: April 28, 2025 10:27

Yeah but Keep Up Blues wasnt around till 78 .....



ROCKMAN

Re: Brian Quit the Rolling Stones? What do you think about Brian's departure?
Posted by: GasLightStreet ()
Date: April 29, 2025 07:22

Quote
Glimmerest
Quote
More Hot Rocks
The guy was a flash in the pan. Just like Jim Morrison. A semi poser with a mama’s boy toughness. Beer muscles that was afraid of a mouse. A playground bully.

I'm sorry but I find this to be such a shallow and regressive. Any characterization of Morrison or Brian as artists is going to be limited by the simple fact that they died too soon and never even got to experience the maturity of entering middle-ages (or even their 30s). As for a moral judgement of them, none of us actually knew them, any many of those who did know them missed them and mourned greatly, even the ones who were hurt by them.

The respect both have to this day is incredible. Especially by their peers. I'm not including hacks like Motley Crue or whoever that foam at the mouth defending their own work. Yeah Morrison was a drunk late on but he did write some fantastic lyrics. Jones was drugged out and did a lot of stupid shit - but he did bring a level of musicianship and creativity to the Stones that neither Mick or Keith had - ever.

It's about talent, not... whatever that was that More Hot Rocks said.

Re: Brian Jones talks
Posted by: Gr3yColl3ct0r ()
Date: December 18, 2025 22:40

Excuse me for 2 more stupid questions but there is the reason to ask(maybe later I'll explain):

Maybe someone here knows who could use nickname "FullX" or "FoolX" or sequenced together that years in that community? I've found only Polish jazzrock/fusion group of Adam Fulara named "Full X Fool X" but maybe there was some other cause of this bandname choice in addition to leader's name.

Is there any probability Brian could have walked through Hanwell Center hall near the room #11 last 2 weeks of his life - i.e. when Deep Purple MkII have already started to rehearse there? - As I know he could went there searhcing for The Who which was in USA that days. Or, on other hand, is there any probability of that Brian could have listened at least once early rehearsal tape of Deep Purple MKII. Or at 2x-least is it known what he thought about Deep Purple MKI ? - 'Cause it's almost completely impossible that he had not listened to Deep Purple either live or on tape at all.
Anyway it is really mystic coincidence that 1st live performance of Deep Purple MK2 took place in "Speakeasy"(or alike, I may misremember exact club name) the day Brian being buried.

Re: Brian Jones talks
Posted by: exilestones ()
Date: December 22, 2025 00:05

Quote
Rockman


Milan 1967 .......

This pic inspires me to play Between the Buttons.

Re: Rolling Stone: Life And Death Of Brian Jones
Posted by: Gr3yColl3ct0r ()
Date: June 4, 2026 14:16

//// deleted 'cause posted without quote, 10 excuses



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2026-06-04 14:22 by Gr3yColl3ct0r.

Re: Rolling Stone: Life And Death Of Brian Jones
Posted by: Gr3yColl3ct0r ()
Date: June 4, 2026 14:20

Quote
paulspendel
One of the readers on this forum is monitoring on behalf of a London libel law firm working for The Stones. I mean, they have got their sticky fingers anywhere, make no mistake. Together we have a lot of fun with some of the posts here.

I hope you don't mind me reaching out. If so let me ask you about this:
"libel law firm working for The Stones": I'm afraid of the legal issues if I'd dare to use AI-copy Mick voice extracted by e.g. FADR. I've started to learn NN in 1997 and in 2018 got a job on it - so do know how it works. But if the legal team monitors everything everywhere .... .



------------
PS: BTW some note about open mind: I am trying to put things together within different (almost conspirological) stories about Brian Jones in my own quite tricky way. In this framework, I really need to find out the creation timeline of Terry’s (and yours, from a certain point) books in the Who Killed Christopher Robin... series — for each of editions from 1994, 2004, 2013, 2016, and the unfortunately unreleased 2019. I mean the timeline of key steps: witness searching, witness interviews, data gathering, planning, writing raw/drafts, rewriting for clarity, finalizing, etc. The cue is that this chronology (which may be quite interleaved!) would correspond in time to a certain, entirely different sequence of events.

So as an engineer by education I suppose that the more time correlation points of 2 different event sequences the less the probability of clear coincidence - just and the only. I must admit now I cannot explain the nature of the second (so far hidden) event set, 'cause if I reveal it prematurely, some may dismiss it as an attempt to fit facts to my hypothesis.

In given circumstances I could only beg you to kindly help me with any information on the timeline of the books’ creation steps (for each edition, ohhh, I see) or direct me where I might find it (e.g., to Terry). In my defense I could insist that if these two timelines align well, the implications will be something nobody except a few could even ever imagine! (Though just somewhere between absolutely and almost unbelievable — =’winking smiley.) But if not, I will gladly claim I was a full fool: OK, I'm honest.



------------------------
------------------------
------------------------
PPS ...and also I still could not decide whether or not it's funny to suppose what Glimmering would have done if they have read Ian Stevenson's "20 cases..." book or at least have heard about it given common interest in rock culture from the 1960s in mystics/occultism(as I've read Anita claimed herself a witch and Mick wrote "Sympathy 4 the devil" based on Bulgakoff's book "M & M").

The danger is as I've discovered on quite a deep conspirological forums it's highly probable that so-called "Soul Hunters" do exist. DISCLAIMER: now I'm talking about just and the only what THEY believe in - NOT about what The Absolute Final Truth is -=8). And their belief is weird and evil far beyond the commonly imaginable level: they believe they chase e.g. W.Churchil-2.0 pr e.g. R.J.Mitchell-2.0(I mean Spitfire author) and so on quite long list - i.e. those who's contribution to the victory over the Nazi was great 'cause mainly they are Nazi mystics - as I've discovered. But rarely S-H would do the dirty job for those who 1)got many info-skeletons in their wardrobe AND 2) have very much money AND 3) also believe in something alike. - All 3 conditions = TRUE for Glimmering. (Or the 3rd is not?....)

The most dangerous their feature is the following:
For each their "target" "soul-hunters" maintain aprx 1000 long alleged-list 'cause are NOT even by themselves sure which e.g. "Churchill-2.0" is the true one and therefore ... chase them ALL EQUALLY horribly and continue even after they killed or so "the true one"(as they think) in order to just not let anyone outside of their community understand their logic at all !!!

Maybe you know them under the different name: "gang(-)stalkers": authors of (almost?) all posts about "gangstalking" have no idea of WHY they chase their targets. - This is just and the only 'cause nobody except a few could even ever imagine SO perverted thinking type! - Anyway their craziness does NOT make them less criminal - as the least of what I'd just said.

But if you don't believe me at all - at least I hope you have big enough fun reading the key idea for the new fan-fic movie ( - in return to that f*g legal team) -=^))))) .



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2026-06-04 14:59 by Gr3yColl3ct0r.

Goto Page: PreviousFirst...3435363738394041424344
Current Page: 44 of 44


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 453
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home