For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Song about a character, reflecting a time capsule in society. It still is.
Great post, and kudos for not just calling the author a PC idiot. There's more to discuss than just dismissing his opinion out of hand.Quote
DoxaQuote
DandelionPowderman
Song about a character, reflecting a time capsule in society. It still is.
Exactly.
I don't quite get the point of trying to interpret the song "irony-free". Should the song to be interpreted literally, as a particular political statement or declaration or what? Altogether, trying to isolate some certain phrases out of its context, which, after all, is a hot rock and roll tune, its biggest point being making one's ass move, full of double-meaning, edge, humor, irony, even self-irony ("cold English blood running hot"). It is sad that some folks are turning anything such dull literal and serious but stupid interpretation of certain words and phrases, all the use of higher imagination and intellect in seeing the bigger picture is forgotten. Like thinking is forgotten or denied. If anyone understand anything of The Rolling Stones and "Brown Sugar" one knows that there is not anything kind of racism involved. Quite the contrary, the lesson of "Brown Sugar" is anti-racist one actually. Yeah, The Stones are playing with fire indeed (asking a bit from their listeners), but hell, that's what they, and the whole rock and roll culture, was once famous for.
Ian Brennan seems to be a good man, a sort of Alan Lomax of modern times, doing great things, but probably that of taking 'world music' and "promoting voices from underheard regions and persecuted populations" as such a heart agenda, clouds his judgment. Probably such a mainstream giant making tremendous amount of cash in music business as the Stones do, is a natural (and easy) target of criticism. That's what I take the tune of his article to be. That of moralizing them and their success. They are winning by wrong means (the claim of the Stones stealing black man's music and cashing with it, is not far I guess). The normative sentence "Instead of being held to a higher standard as their stature should demand, those with celebrity and power are too often given a pass" sounds simply naive.
No, I wouldn't speak the lyrics to “Brown Sugar” in its entirety aloud and irony-free before a diverse group of strangers. But I wouldn't speak "Satisfaction" or "Jumping Jack Flash" or, for god's sake, "Angie" or "Great Balls of Fire" or "Waterloo" either... People would think I am crazy... are any of those lyrics intended to be delivered that way or in that kind of context? C'mon... Those are bloody songs - music!
Funnily, from all Stones tunes, Bob Dylan decided to cover "Brown Sugar"...
- Doxa
Quote
hopkins
that i shot the sheriff guy is in BIG trouble now...
Yeah, but he didn't shoot the deputy...that's gotta count for something, right?Quote
RedhotcarpetQuote
hopkins
that i shot the sheriff guy is in BIG trouble now...
Exactly. He isnt of course. Nor should he.
Quote
DoxaQuote
DandelionPowderman
Song about a character, reflecting a time capsule in society. It still is.
Exactly.
I don't quite get the point of trying to interpret the song "irony-free". Should the song to be interpreted literally, as a particular political statement or declaration or what? Altogether, trying to isolate some certain phrases out of its context, which, after all, is a hot rock and roll tune, its biggest point being making one's ass move, full of double-meaning, edge, humor, irony, even self-irony ("cold English blood running hot"). It is sad that some folks are turning anything such dull literal and serious but stupid interpretation of certain words and phrases, all the use of higher imagination and intellect in seeing the bigger picture is forgotten. Like thinking is forgotten or denied. If anyone understand anything of The Rolling Stones and "Brown Sugar" one knows that there is not anything kind of racism involved. Quite the contrary, the lesson of "Brown Sugar" is anti-racist one actually. Yeah, The Stones are playing with fire indeed (asking a bit from their listeners), but hell, that's what they, and the whole rock and roll culture, was once famous for.
Ian Brennan seems to be a good man, a sort of Alan Lomax of modern times, doing great things, but probably that of taking 'world music' and "promoting voices from underheard regions and persecuted populations" as such a heart agenda, clouds his judgment. Probably such a mainstream giant making tremendous amount of cash in music business as the Stones do, is a natural (and easy) target of criticism. That's what I take the tune of his article to be. That of moralizing them and their success. They are winning by wrong means (the claim of the Stones stealing black man's music and cashing with it, is not far I guess). The normative sentence "Instead of being held to a higher standard as their stature should demand, those with celebrity and power are too often given a pass" sounds simply naive.
No, I wouldn't speak the lyrics to “Brown Sugar” in its entirety aloud and irony-free before a diverse group of strangers. But I wouldn't speak "Satisfaction" or "Jumping Jack Flash" or, for god's sake, "Angie" or "Great Balls of Fire" or "Waterloo" either... People would think I am crazy... are any of those lyrics intended to be delivered that way or in that kind of context? C'mon... Those are bloody songs - music!
Funnily, from all Stones tunes, Bob Dylan decided to cover "Brown Sugar"...
- Doxa
Quote
MadMax
Only in America. Well Little Ian Brennan, I might tell you I sang the whole song in front of a camera in Copenhagens Central Station on the 2nd of september 2006 on my way to Horsens. The film crew wanted me to perform Satisfaction but I wanted to sing Brown Sugar instead, as it's a better tune. A capella and all, going down the escalators I did it in one take. I did a damn good job and I got to see it in my hotel room in Horsens the same night after Kent Flash had performed on stage in the Town Square, I remember a great Heart Of Stone. Happy Days!
These hipsters who doesn't get one jota of history or Culture needs to banned from Writing in big papers like The Chicago one. Bet he got his Little beard and his Little baseball cap and daesh trousers (cut above the ankles) on when he write his rubbish. What a C**t! Well it got me fired up for the day anyway, Cheers!
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Song about a character, reflecting a time capsule in society. It still is.
Quote
Big Al
All I draw from Brown Sugar is that Mick must’ve really being enjoying bonking Marsha Hunt at the time. Actually, has Mick ever been romantically linked with any other black women?
Quote
rbk
The entirety of the ROLLING STONES image and history is based on cultural appropriation and misogyny.
Ian Brennan is a social justice posturing twit. He can listen to Beyoncé and Katy Perry and leave us knuckle dragging Neanderthals to wallow in our un-woke ignorance whilst dancing and swilling beer and shouting,'YEAH! YEAH! YEAH! WHOOOO!!!" for literally the ten thousandth time.
It's amazing the lengths virtue flaunting poseurs will go to get noticed on the internet.
Quote
duke richardson
they should have censored Bobby's sax solo immediately..
its the raunchiest solo ever ....