Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Mick's Birthday Party 1972
Posted by: exilestones ()
Date: October 16, 2018 03:36

Gotham Satyricon: Chocolate Mousse At The End Of The Road
Mick’s birthday bash, and another Stones tour comes to a close
By TIMOTHY FERRIS



Stevie Wonder joins Mick Jagger onstage in 1972.
Michael Ochs Archives/Getty Images

In July 26th the US was favored by an eclipse of the moon, Mick Jagger‘s 29th birthday, and the conclusion of the Rolling Stones‘ hit road show, in which they play The World’s Greatest Rock and Roll Band.

The first event went uncelebrated. The latter two were the occasion, on the top floor of the St. Regis Hotel in New York, for a party that had something for everyone, even for Bob Dylan. Wearing his black aviator glasses, a checkered shirt, a white fedora and a suspicious smile, Dylan stepped up to a Newsweek photographer and asked if his picture might be taken with Zsa Zsa Gabor, who was idling nearby in a tie-dye evening gown.

Why certainly. The Newsweek lady approached Zsa Zsa and her escort, Huntington Hartford, and conveyed the request.

“Who ees he?” inquired Zsa Zsa.

“He’s the most famous rock star in the world!” said Huntington Hartford, speaking quickly.

“Oh, veil then,” said the Zsa, brightening. “I luhv him!”

Dylan approached, put his arm around Zsa Zsa, and the photo was snapped. “Be sure to send me a copy,” he reminded the Newsweek lady.

This occurred ten years and four months after Dylan released his first album, and seven years, four months after “Maggie’s Farm.” Just for the record.

        
                             
Bob Dylan and Zsa Zsa Gabor

Something for everyone. Count Basie played and so did Muddy Waters. Gerry Miller of Andy Warhol’s crew was a late arrival – she popped out of a birthday cake, wearing only pasties and a black garter, and did a dance which might be called suggestive in the sense that Melvin Laird might be called a moderate. Jagger, sitting with Bianca, grinned broadly and clapped. Keith Richards stared into his drink.

Four Harlem tapdancers did 20 minutes (some guest thought it was dynamite; others called it racist), then everyone resumed milling around. There was plenty of milling to be done. The party was being thrown by Ahmet Ertegun, president of Atlantic Records, who apparently had assembled the list of 500 guests with the idea of uniting giants of rock music with giants of hip society.

Warhol went around taking Polaroid pictures. George Plimpton stood listening politely, as always. Woody Allen, who had walked out of the Garden halfway through the Stones concert, wore a large hat to hide his face. Dick Cavett wore dark glasses to hide his face, but later took them off and settled into conversation with Dylan. Robbie Robertson, work on the Rock of Ages album recently completed, sat and talked with Jerry Wexler. Ertegun gleefully introduced everyone to everyone else.

Jagger joined Stevie Wonder for a brief jam with Muddy Waters. Then he and Bianca gathered up their birthday presents – a snuff box for coke, a silver cross, and so on – and left. The affair broke up at dawn.

Some were not thrilled. “What are Zsa Zsa Gabor and George Plimpton and all those other society freeloaders doing at a birthday party for Mick Jagger?” asked Grace Lichtenstein, who covered the party for the New York Times. “If the Rolling Stones are the newest mind-@#$%& for the Truman Capote crowd, what does that say about the Stones?”

“The party was depressing,” said Peter Rudge, the 25-year-old tour manager. “It was a very nice gesture, a party thrown for Mick and the group, but it was really very, very difficult for anyone on the tour to relate to those people. You know – what does princess so-and-so have to do with the assistant electrician sitting at the next table? No one could really enjoy themselves in that kind of environment.”

Jagger had his own critical assessment of another party thrown for the group two nights earlier at the Four Seasons. He stayed only seven minutes. As he was completing his rapid circuit of the crowd, a fat man dressed in red appeared and scuttled sideways in front of him, always a step ahead, talking nonstop: “You galvanized us, Mick! You galvanized us!”

This clot of humanity, centered around Jagger and led by the talking crab, passed into a glass hallway connecting the two halves of the restaurant. A small door to the roof was suddenly jerked open and Jagger leaped sideways out into the dark. People who had been drifting near Jagger–while pretending not to – suddenly found themselves with no focus but the fat man, who was talking to thin air. Jagger had simply vanished. It was an act of magic.



“We’re having a good time now,” Jagger shouted on the last night, just as the Stones’ beautiful concert version of “You Can’t Always Get What You Want” had died away. He had reason to feel good. The floor of the Garden was filled with people standing on their chairs and grinning. The roof, an orange steel umbrella held up with turnbuckles the size of bungalows, had been rising and falling softly each time Charlie Watts slapped down his foot. The stage crew was stacking yellow boxes full of aerodynamically sound custard pies on the amp tops; others behind them were unboxing a giant birthday cake. Jagger jumped straight up, came down on the opening crash of “All Down the Line,” and the tour – 54 shows, 29 cities – headed toward the close.


Lynn Goldsmith photo

It ended with a barrage of well-aimed pies smacking Mick in the face as Keith guffawed. Bianca appeared, gave Mick a quick kiss and a big Teddy bear, and departed. Mick threw the stuffed bear on the stage. Stevie Wonder came out for a duet on “Satisfaction,” the encore the Stones had been using since Philadelphia. Mick laughed as more pies flew, but kept his mind on the show: When Stevie, after two unsuccessful attempts to get the crowd to sing “Happy birthday, Mick,” made a third try, Mick glared at him, grabbed a mike and drowned him out. A few moments later the Stones were gone and Chip Monck was thanking everyone, wiping custard from his eye, and saying goodnight.


Andy Warhol, Princess Radziwill and Truman Capote

So these last shows came off all right. There was relatively little trouble: On the last night a bottle from the balcony smashed on the stage a foot from Jagger, who had been struck by a similar missile at the Forum in Toronto. Briefly shaken, he walked from the mike for a moment, returned and snarled, “Don’t throw no bottles on the stage!” Nobody else did.

Outside, 15 were arrested Monday night in scuffles with the police. On closing night a large crowd of non-ticketholders gathered, and when the terrible realization came over them that they really were not going to get in, some rushed the barricades. The result was more arrests and some injuries, as mounted cops and a few dim patrolmen with nightsticks pushed them back. In the confusion, at least one man with a valid ticket was refused admittance.

The media all seemed to be drinking from the same spigot, the brew from which proclaimed that Jagger possesses a mysterious alchemy, giving him power over the multitudes. “Power” was a word frequently used by writers searching for ways to describe the shows, and in a city where power is as blood, tickets for the final night brought as much as $250 each on the streets, with higher prices rumored in private deals.

Other, more curious notions surfaced as well. Older critics, unnerved by all those stomping feet, talked a lot about “control.” The audiences were viewed as mobs of Huns who, once aroused, threatened constantly to perpetrate another Altamont. Not allowed for was the fact that the audience at Altamont was generally docile, and not in possession of the decisive knives and pool cues. Jagger said that so far as he was concerned, the “control” business was crap.

Those with at least a fist still stuck in the womb of the Sixties talked about “survival power.” Dylan and the Beatles are through, went this line, only the Stones will flop on our beaches, so let’s go see them. Popular enough was this view that it lent to the concerts of certain tint of the antique, a sepia tone of nostalgia, a quaint remove. But it failed to explain why a major portion of each Stones audience was under 18, and therefore presumably too young to care much more about the legend of the Stones than they care about the mystery of the pyramids.

When on closing night Stevie Wonder said, “I’d like to thank the Rolling Stones very much for giving me a chance to express myself on the tour,” the question inevitably arose as to how much the Stones got to express themselves. Everyone seemed to agree that the Stones were a highly professional gang of musicians; nobody seemed to get the impression that they were too thrilled about playing their own music.

“Sometimes the professionalism did detract from the spontaneity,” said Peter Rudge. “For instance, you didn’t get any guitar breaks by Mick Taylor. But then, you never did . . . The Stones have never been a jamming band, and never will be.”

“You always become a parody of yourself,” Rudge added.

By the time it reached the East Coast, the Stones’ show had been so carefully analyzed and refined that it varied hardly more than by the few words Mick threw in between songs. Everything else was down pat, from Jagger’s deep-knee creep in “Midnight Rambler” to the revolving mirrors which cast the spots onto the audience near the end. People came to see the Stones with high, high expectations, and to avoid disappointing them the Stones delivered concerts as rich and polished – and remote – as their records.

But improvisation would have been next to impossible anyway. At the four Garden shows the Stones employed 16,000 watts of amplifiers and 150 speakers. The sound produced added up to 136 decibels in the front row, about six DB above what is usually designated the threshold of pain. In these conditions the Stones could hardly hear each other; an attempt to throw in something new on impulse would have been something like trying to put a 747 into a slow roll.

When the Stones turned up their amps toward the end of each concert, what developed was less music than an exposition of the aura of music, a journey in the rarefied highlands of pure white sound and rhythm. A device exists which purports to photograph the aura of the human hand, a glowing field the shape and size of which is different for each person. If a piece of music when performed can be said to have a life of its own, perhaps as good a place as any to look for its aura will be in the red zone of the VU meters.

Working at steel desks in the days after the last concert, the Stones’ business people verified what they had already known, that the tour worked. It grossed $3-4 million. After paying expenses of about a million dollars and doling out the local promoters’ cut, the Stones stand to make up to $2 million before taxes – “Enough to keep them away from the US for about a year, I hope,” said Rudge. In addition, a record of the Philadelphia show and a film are forthcoming.

With his feet up during a break in the deskwork, Rudge talked about how the tour compared to the real world.

“A kind of hysterical thing builds up around the group,” he said. “We’d go into a hotel room and sit down, there would be people there, and you would want a cup of tea. Someone would say, ‘Well, shouldn’t we have champagne?’ As if at twelve noon you drink champagne, not tea.

“You’d get back to the hotel after a show and all the restaurants would be closed, so all of a sudden everyone would start making preparations to open up the most expensive restaurant in town, when all anybody really wanted was to go round to the White Tower and have a hamburger.”

But the important thing, thought Rudge, like most others on the tour, was that it came off. “They’ve shown that they can tour the US and tour it more successfully than anyone else.” Will there be another American tour? “Yes.”


This story is from the August 31st, 1972 issue of Rolling Stone.

Re: Mick's Birthday Party 1972
Posted by: 35love ()
Date: October 16, 2018 05:26

I don’t care what he did,
THAT X MARKS THE SPOT PICTURE
Send It To Me

Re: Mick's Birthday Party 1972
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: October 16, 2018 06:23



hhhhhhhheeehhhhh
I get it Body X
Hope you do too ………



ROCKMAN

Re: Mick's Birthday Party 1972
Posted by: exilestones ()
Date: October 17, 2018 02:33


Andy Warhol with Stevie Wonder backstage Madison Square Garden, at a Rolling Stones show Stevie opened, July 26, 1972 (Mick’s 29th birthday).

Re: Mick's Birthday Party 1972
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: October 17, 2018 02:43

Nice Shot ...^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^



ROCKMAN

Re: Mick's Birthday Party 1972
Posted by: Glam Descendant ()
Date: October 17, 2018 03:42

>"Gerry Miller of Andy Warhol’s crew was a late arrival – she popped out of a birthday cake..."


I have an issue of "Andy Warhol's Interview" from 1972 when they (briefly) had Classified ads in the back (a la old "Rolling Stone") in which that same birthday cake is listed for sale. I wonder what became of it. (Also, it's "Geri" -- she was in FLESH & TRASH.)

Re: Mick's Birthday Party 1972
Posted by: Cristiano Radtke ()
Date: October 17, 2018 03:47

"Bob Dylan in the audience at a Rolling Stones concert at Madison Square Garden, New York City, 1972."

© Thomas Monaster



[www.monasterphoto.com]

Re: Mick's Birthday Party 1972
Posted by: pmk251 ()
Date: October 17, 2018 04:41

In '72 the band was everyone's darlings, the media, the critics, the celebs and the fans. You had the Boston show to add to the bad boy image. I know I am quibbling, but it is too bad the Texas shows were shot and not this one (Dead Flowers notwithstanding). My favorite tour is still '69, but by the end of this tour the band was well greased, muscular and hit you like a Mack truck.

Re: Mick's Birthday Party 1972
Posted by: timbernardis ()
Date: October 17, 2018 08:54

I really enjoyed reading this article. Reminded me in a fresh sort of way of the old days, things I have not read about nor thought about in years. A stroll down memory lane.

It was rather humorous to read that they netted 2 million from that tour. On A Bigger Bang, they made what, 525 million, tho that may have been before expenses were deducted. Someone here should know. And of course, that was for 145 shows. But still, there is absolutely no comparison.


plexi

Re: Mick's Birthday Party 1972
Posted by: SomeTorontoGirl ()
Date: October 17, 2018 10:45

The party in 1792 was wild!


Re: Mick's Birthday Party 1972
Posted by: hopkins ()
Date: October 17, 2018 12:36

I am not a braggart; all i did personally was fill out a lot of postcards and pay 60 bucks for four tickets at Any one of the four shows. (there was one MSG matinee. but i was one of i guess hundreds of thousands of cards im, and probably 75,000 or more local 'winning' the chance to purchase; i had no idea of what night was which day and did not care. i got the news that i could buy a ticket and was in heaven; i had no idea at the time what the heck month his birthday was in but knew he was 27, and now peeps say 29 so i'm confused...please hep w that someone...
anyway, i've written about it here over the two years here, and of course the cake throwing was delightful fun; i was watching Taylor and Bill finally do some quick movces on stage haw haw...
....but really, the meat of that eve was the damn music; and i mean Stevie too; with and without Mick; i am so glad that others who are young can enjoy that; i know the recordings are not the best, to say the least...but...
if you were there....it didn't sound like that; it sounded real warm and ON, no lie, it was ON. i was only newly 21 but i had been to 9 years of shows; some were revelatory and historic, so there WAS some frame of referende,
i was a snotty kid when it came to music (didn't think so at the time but...i was)
and def went with big Expectations and Hopes...

so my 'frame of referende' went obsolete before the first chorus of BS was over, as they came on ferocious and stayed that way for seventy minutes..
some other time if peeps ask i will search my memory further...

...i was never not totally 'there' and neitgher were any of them....
influding Stu; which remains personally very important to me...
all those players including the name i stole for here..
they were pumping for realz from the starting pistol;
it seemed like they had been let out of the metaphoric 'spinal tapian'
kinda cage or something; tho Mick's little curtsy and scowl flashes amidst
the knowing smiles and nods was magnetic. he's the fricken best there is, that's who the eff mick jagger is, man. never forget it..
he belies his own toughness with that slippery high diplomacy quotient that possibly saved his life in a thousand interviews with the same dumb questtions from the grand-daugher of the first person who asked it in her family chhezus...

he was ferocious and ON....it's glorious glorious glorious music they cared about; i wish i had film of Nicky and Stu goin' at it at the same time cuz nothing other than tears could be proper acknowlegvement of my gratitude to see grown men do that....it changed everything about how i felt about everything.
for the better and tough worst; i love that band. still do.

they were overwhelmed with glory and power; i'll stop right here.
it was more than a rock and roll show it was so deeply truly heartstruck realized American music with the perfect perfect perfect UK working class (micks dad was a teacher so they skirted the middle but Bill, Brian, Keith, (not sure about Stu OR totally sure about Charlie) ...
...it felt tough; it felt like the best rock and roll writing and material ever; it was a very, very cohesive well-worked oily power machine and a mighty roar. i can go to my grave saying I heard Bill playing right from his own amp as well as the PA and it moved my clothing around; not just the pants part girls why do you always go there, never mind glad you do...

that's it, it's late.
hopkins out.
news from the front,
you head it hear last.
this has been an 'uh oh' production.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2018-10-17 12:44 by hopkins.

Re: Mick's Birthday Party 1972
Posted by: schillid ()
Date: October 17, 2018 17:17

Quote
hopkins
...

news from the front,


That was a fun read.

I had seen them at the Spectrum a few days earlier...
A similarly mind-blowing experience.

Re: Mick's Birthday Party 1972
Posted by: shattered ()
Date: October 18, 2018 02:20

Quote
SomeTorontoGirl
The party in 1792 was wild!

smiling smileyFeeding meat to the lions: [iorr.org]smiling smiley

Re: Mick's Birthday Party 1972
Posted by: HEILOOBAAS ()
Date: October 8, 2019 12:46



My small effort at preserving the memory.

Re: Mick's Birthday Party 1972
Posted by: dead.flowers ()
Date: October 8, 2019 15:12

Quote
exilestones

Andy Warhol with Stevie Wonder backstage Madison Square Garden, at a Rolling Stones show Stevie opened, July 26, 1972 (Mick’s 29th birthday).

Does that mean that Andy Warhol was the first to sport ragged blue jeans back in 1972?

Re: Mick's Birthday Party 1972
Posted by: jlowe ()
Date: October 8, 2019 16:11

So....'Mick glared at Stevie Wonder'.
Priceless.



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 1986
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home