For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
lem motlow
Thank you very much,I’m always glad to hear the Stones bass player is doing well.
It seems Bill has completely retired now,no more Rhythm Kings or anything.
Since we won’t have many more Stones albums it’s too bad they don’t do a Brian Wilson kinda of thing where the live band and studio band are different.
You could have songs with the 72 lineup, the 78 lineup etc. sorry just thinking out loud (and asking for creativity from a corporation)
Quote
Palace Revolution 2000Quote
lem motlow
Thank you very much,I’m always glad to hear the Stones bass player is doing well.
It seems Bill has completely retired now,no more Rhythm Kings or anything.
Since we won’t have many more Stones albums it’s too bad they don’t do a Brian Wilson kinda of thing where the live band and studio band are different.
You could have songs with the 72 lineup, the 78 lineup etc. sorry just thinking out loud (and asking for creativity from a corporation)
Yes, the Rolling Stones bass player. It is beyond understanding to me that they have tried to erase his existence and contributions.
Must say Darryl pretty much rocked on Hyde Park emotional rescue. They should do fingerprint file with himQuote
24FPSQuote
Palace Revolution 2000Quote
lem motlow
Thank you very much,I’m always glad to hear the Stones bass player is doing well.
It seems Bill has completely retired now,no more Rhythm Kings or anything.
Since we won’t have many more Stones albums it’s too bad they don’t do a Brian Wilson kinda of thing where the live band and studio band are different.
You could have songs with the 72 lineup, the 78 lineup etc. sorry just thinking out loud (and asking for creativity from a corporation)
Yes, the Rolling Stones bass player. It is beyond understanding to me that they have tried to erase his existence and contributions.
I don't know. Keith said a lot that showed the truth in a tribute on Bill's 80th birthday. He called him his favorite. It's pretty apparent Darryl never really panned out as a studio bassist. Now they have a dependable appendage when they tour. Darryl doesn't seem particularly ambitious. He's not appearing on jazz albums, or anything you would think he's suited to. It's a comfortable life. Mick has no intention of making him a full member. They could replace Darryl tomorrow and hardly any one would notice.
Quote
Palace Revolution 2000
Yes, the Rolling Stones bass player. It is beyond understanding to me that they have tried to erase his existence and contributions.
Yup. when was the last time they mentioned Mick Taylor??Quote
His MajestyQuote
Palace Revolution 2000
Yes, the Rolling Stones bass player. It is beyond understanding to me that they have tried to erase his existence and contributions.
He is not a stone alone when it comes to that.
Quote
NeverMakeASaintOfMeYup. when was the last time they mentioned Mick Taylor??Quote
His MajestyQuote
Palace Revolution 2000
Yes, the Rolling Stones bass player. It is beyond understanding to me that they have tried to erase his existence and contributions.
He is not a stone alone when it comes to that.
Quote
Big Al
I’m pretty certain His Majesty is referring to someone else.
Quote
24FPSQuote
Palace Revolution 2000Quote
lem motlow
Thank you very much,I’m always glad to hear the Stones bass player is doing well.
It seems Bill has completely retired now,no more Rhythm Kings or anything.
Since we won’t have many more Stones albums it’s too bad they don’t do a Brian Wilson kinda of thing where the live band and studio band are different.
You could have songs with the 72 lineup, the 78 lineup etc. sorry just thinking out loud (and asking for creativity from a corporation)
Yes, the Rolling Stones bass player. It is beyond understanding to me that they have tried to erase his existence and contributions.
I don't know. Keith said a lot that showed the truth in a tribute on Bill's 80th birthday. He called him his favorite. It's pretty apparent Darryl never really panned out as a studio bassist. Now they have a dependable appendage when they tour. Darryl doesn't seem particularly ambitious. He's not appearing on jazz albums, or anything you would think he's suited to. It's a comfortable life. Mick has no intention of making him a full member. They could replace Darryl tomorrow and hardly any one would notice.
Quote
EJM
I’m seeing Darryl in Ronnie Scott’s in London
Quote
Stoneage
It's all history now but I think Bill should have hung in there (The Stones) a couple of more years.It would have been for the better for all of us. Even more so for Bill since the big money started
to come in in the nineties (be sure, Bill counts every penny). Maybe they went for cred when they enlisted Darryl? Must have been something like that. Anyway, we have already discussed that...
Quote
24FPSQuote
Stoneage
It's all history now but I think Bill should have hung in there (The Stones) a couple of more years.It would have been for the better for all of us. Even more so for Bill since the big money started
to come in in the nineties (be sure, Bill counts every penny). Maybe they went for cred when they enlisted Darryl? Must have been something like that. Anyway, we have already discussed that...
Bill has done all right. They made enough millions on the 81/82 & 89/90 tours to sustain most of us the rest of our lives. Is there a big difference in lifestyle between being worth $50 Million or $200 Million? (The internet has Bill worth $80 Million, Charlie $170 Million). I think Bill had enough to sustain him, and stepped off the bus. And he continues to have revenue streams that most of us could live off handily. Taylor is the one that parachuted way too early.