For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
,Quote
Hairball
In a sense, there's similarities with Elvis to the Stones' career.
While the Stones never joined the army obviously, they did go at war with each other, and after that they were never quite the same as far as quality recordings go.
Instead they rely on live shows just as Elvis did in his latter years in Vegas - hence the Vegas years that often describes the latter day Stones.
Quote
jlowe,Quote
Hairball
In a sense, there's similarities with Elvis to the Stones' career.
While the Stones never joined the army obviously, they did go at war with each other, and after that they were never quite the same as far as quality recordings go.
Instead they rely on live shows just as Elvis did in his latter years in Vegas - hence the Vegas years that often describes the latter day Stones.
Actually I'm sure ONE of the Stones (Bill) did join the Army. As he was born in 1936, he was eligible for the UK's National Service when he was 18. It was eventually phased out some years later.
Having said that, I'm sure at the height of their 'bad boy' phase many people would have felt a stint in the Army would have done them 'a lot of good'.
Can't imagine that Brian would have lasted more than 3 months (the Beatles Manager Brian Epstein couldn't cope with Army life either).
Quote
stonehearted
That quote by Lennon is a bit naïve, as are, frankly, some of the comments above.
Elvis never joined the army, he was drafted.
Age 23 is a bit late to be called up, when there are no wars and plenty of 18 and 19 year olds to forcibly enlist.
By the time Lennon was 23, England had long since abandoned its National Service requirements.
Elvis did some fine things later on, like Suspicious Minds -- one of his best songs and a #1 to boot.
Lennon's bitter comment probably reflects the disappointing scenario of a trailblazing icon becoming instead something more of a respectable Establishment figure.
Quote
SighuntQuote
stonehearted
That quote by Lennon is a bit naïve, as are, frankly, some of the comments above.
Elvis never joined the army, he was drafted.
Age 23 is a bit late to be called up, when there are no wars and plenty of 18 and 19 year olds to forcibly enlist.
By the time Lennon was 23, England had long since abandoned its National Service requirements.
Elvis did some fine things later on, like Suspicious Minds -- one of his best songs and a #1 to boot.
Lennon's bitter comment probably reflects the disappointing scenario of a trailblazing icon becoming instead something more of a respectable Establishment figure.
As a long time Elvis fan, i would have to agree with a lot of your observations. The 1968 Comeback special, and later the 1969 Memphis Sessions as tomcasagranda noted did add respectability to his languishing career, but I have always felt that the Colonel's attempts to "sanitize" Elvis and broaden his appeal via pop sugar recordings after his army stint along with those horrid grade zzz movies was not the best business decision by his manager. The 1969 recordings re-affirm that Elvis-given some good material was a great singer and artist.
Quote
tomcasagrandaQuote
SighuntQuote
stonehearted
That quote by Lennon is a bit naïve, as are, frankly, some of the comments above.
Elvis never joined the army, he was drafted.
Age 23 is a bit late to be called up, when there are no wars and plenty of 18 and 19 year olds to forcibly enlist.
By the time Lennon was 23, England had long since abandoned its National Service requirements.
Elvis did some fine things later on, like Suspicious Minds -- one of his best songs and a #1 to boot.
Lennon's bitter comment probably reflects the disappointing scenario of a trailblazing icon becoming instead something more of a respectable Establishment figure.
As a long time Elvis fan, i would have to agree with a lot of your observations. The 1968 Comeback special, and later the 1969 Memphis Sessions as tomcasagranda noted did add respectability to his languishing career, but I have always felt that the Colonel's attempts to "sanitize" Elvis and broaden his appeal via pop sugar recordings after his army stint along with those horrid grade zzz movies was not the best business decision by his manager. The 1969 recordings re-affirm that Elvis-given some good material was a great singer and artist.
Thanks.
The years 1968-1973 showcased some great recordings by Elvis. I'm really pleased with the way Sony / BMG have re-marketed his catalogue. Grouping the Stax Recordings together, and re-mastering the 1972 Madison Sq Garden gigs were a stroke of genius.
However, not all his recordings from 1960 onwards were sugary: Reconsider Baby from Elvis Is Bank is a brilliant treatment of Lowell Fulson's classic.
Quote
rollmops
I like "Old Elvis/Fat Elvis" as much as young Elvis. One can get caught up in the image, the lore and the beauty of youth; we probably all do. Once we escape those prejudices, we become a better listener and we can enjoy the music.
Rockandroll,
Mops
Quote
stonehearted
That quote by Lennon is a bit naïve, as are, frankly, some of the comments above.
Elvis never joined the army, he was drafted.
Quote
slewanQuote
stonehearted
That quote by Lennon is a bit naïve, as are, frankly, some of the comments above.
Elvis never joined the army, he was drafted.
right, but remember what Muhammad Ali did when he was drafted.
For Elvis joining the army was a kind of career step stongly adviced by his manager, who was trying the rebelious Elvis of the 50s into a nice boy (and Elvis was stupid enough to follows Parker's advice)
Quote
stonehearted
One could also say that Lennon died the day he met Yoko.