Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto Page: PreviousFirst...23456789101112Next
Current Page: 7 of 12
Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: Spud ()
Date: October 4, 2017 14:59

Quote
Green Lady
...It's a trade off. How much of your freedom to own serious hardware are you willing to give up in order to make the spree-killer or terrorist's plans harder to carry out? You can't make everything 100% safe: recent UK terrorists used cars, knives and a home made bomb that fortunately didn't work, but if they could have bought semi automatic weapons freely they might have killed hundreds rather than dozens. You can't make the killer's job impossible, but you can make it difficult, and that will save lives.

I can see that in a country with much more dangerous wildlife than ours, and a hunting culture, a gun or two is a necessity in rural areas. Our farmers have their shotguns too. But in most places in Britain the police do not need to assume that anyone they deal with might suddenly pull a gun: if the police shoot someone it's rare, not routine. Accidents and suicides involving firearms are also unusual.

It took a long time to get here. I think it began after the first world war when the government was worried that left wing strikers and revolutionaries might use some of the weapons they had brought back from the trenches, and it's been gradually tightened up over the years. And it's the law abiding gun owners like your dad who are inconvenienced so that the criminals have a harder time of it. For a start, why does any ordinary citizen need to own one semi-automatic, let alone several?

Perfectly assessed & expressed.

You can argue either way about how strictly you control the purchase & ownership of sporting or farming guns ...

...but what kind of modern civilised nation can think it ok to make military type semi automatic weapons [& the means to convert them into fully automatic !] available for the man in street to buy whenever, and in whatever quantity he wants.

It's madness.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: MisterDDDD ()
Date: October 4, 2017 15:04

Quote
MisterDDDD
Fully auto machine guns are legal in Vegas.
Such weapons were previously prohibited under the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban, which expired in 2004. Several lawmakers have attempted to renew the ban, coming closest, but still failing, after the Newtown school shooting in 2012."

[www.newsweek.com]

I am no gun enthusiast by any stretch, don't own one don't want one, but even I have shot a couple fully auto machine guns at a range there with buddies for "fun".

Better Laws can help prevent these tragedies. Laws that require more thorough background checks, laws that don't allow stock-pile purchases like this guy did, laws that require longer wait times while mental health issues are investigated, laws that do everything we can to help prevent gun violence without infringing on anyones rights.

The NRA and it's money own the politicians who recently rolled back laws that prevented mentally ill people from owning guns.Current legislation that would make silencers (more) readily available and legal was to be voted on (and likely passed) got postponed this week due to this tragedy. If this guy had silencers many more would likely be dead.

I'm all for the Second Amendment, but clearly there are limits. Common sense legislation is needed to help curb the gun violence. The NRA and it's bought politicians are complicit. Enough.

Also-
Thanks to bv for letting this discussion continue.It's an important one that here in the US we all need to be having.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2017-10-04 15:08 by MisterDDDD.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: Elmo Lewis ()
Date: October 4, 2017 15:29

One other point - much has changed in the 230 or so years since the Constitution was written and ratified. Perhaps it should be looked at again (BTW, I am a gun owner and hunter).

For example, we no longer count blacks as 3/5 of a person as they were counted back then. In the 1700's, no cars, computers, phones, etc.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: keefriff99 ()
Date: October 4, 2017 15:57

Quote
camper88
Quote
keefriff99
The 2nd Amendment, as antiquated and misinterpreted as it is, is enshrined in our Constitution, and isn't going anywhere.

And that's the heart of the problem. People can't seem to get their heads around the idea that an "amendment" by its very definition is NOT enshrined in anything.
I didn't see it can't be changed or shouldn't be changed. I'm saying it WON'T be changed. Look at the frenzied mania that gun owners exhibit. Guns are fetishized extensions of themselves. There is no way that the Second Amendment will ever be modified.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2017-10-04 16:39 by keefriff99.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: Kurt ()
Date: October 4, 2017 16:42

With all due respect, I will repeat myself...
this was a brutal massacre that intentionally targeted innocent American country music fans. @#$%& brutal.

I believe that we should focus on the investigation into the shooter, his motive, his acquaintance and whether or not he worked alone.
Was he radicalized?
Was he funded by others?
What about the reports of a note and videotapes of the crime itself taken from inside his room?

Instead of rushing to political sides of the coin and arguing about America and its laws, or mental illness, or race, why don't we talk more and openly about this particular guy.

Maybe if and when the truth comes out, we won't be able to neatly package it into our own political agendas?!

There has to be WAY MORE to this story than we've been told so far...

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Date: October 4, 2017 16:51

Quote
Kurt
With all due respect, I will repeat myself...
this was a brutal massacre that intentionally targeted innocent American country music fans. @#$%& brutal.

I believe that we should focus on the investigation into the shooter, his motive, his acquaintance and whether or not he worked alone.
Was he radicalized?
Was he funded by others?
What about the reports of a note and videotapes of the crime itself taken from inside his room?

Instead of rushing to political sides of the coin and arguing about America and its laws, or mental illness, or race, why don't we talk more and openly about this particular guy.

Maybe if and when the truth comes out, we won't be able to neatly package it into our own political agendas?!

There has to be WAY MORE to this story than we've been told so far...

Because there have been too many of «that particular guy», who killed innocent people with guns?

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: keefriff99 ()
Date: October 4, 2017 17:02

Quote
stanlove
Quote
keefriff99
Quote
MileHigh
Quote
lem motlow
Look at the FBI stats on gun violence-Americas inner cities are an ongoing war zone.if you take away the gun murders from them the rest of the country is one of the safest on the planet.
State run media won't tell you that and mentally ill white guys fuel the headlines"crazy rednecks with guns,take em away"i cannot believe people still ger their information from television."make sure you get a camera shot of that blood on the concrete boys"

Yes, and there is a true reality disconnect out there in the media. One person calls it "the greatest lie of our generation." It's too hot an issue for here but I hope and pray that it gets resolved one day. This tragic incident should not be used as a vehicle for America bashing. Like I said before, watching the clips from within the crowd itself is devastating, and similar senseless and devastating things are happening every single day in America and although the press minimally reports it, and they are afraid to discuss the root causes.
Ah, there we go: blame the blacks. That's what you want to say, right?

Sounds like PC to me. If anything that was posted is not true then point that out.

I am not saying it's true or not.
I take issue with the description of America's inner cities as "war zones"...simply not true. Crime rates have been steadily declining since the early '90s. Again: this isn't the Bronx in 1977.

Hell, some people have hypothesized that the crime spike in the '60s-'80s was related to brain damage due to lead exposure, and that removing lead from paint and gasoline has reduced criminal activity:

[en.wikipedia.org]

I think that's fascinating.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: Kurt ()
Date: October 4, 2017 17:06

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Because there have been too many of «that particular guy», who killed innocent people with guns?

DP, seriously...enlighten me. I am not intending to come off knowing anymore than any of the rest of us but I am asking questions.

When was the last time someone like "that particular guy" intentionally targeted hundreds of mostly white, mostly young, mostly god-fearing American country music fans? I'm learning that he had been in that room for over a week. Waiting. Was he alone? And where did all the money come from?

This one doesn't fit neatly into anyone's agenda-filled box.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Date: October 4, 2017 17:18

Quote
Kurt
Quote
DandelionPowderman

Because there have been too many of «that particular guy», who killed innocent people with guns?

DP, seriously...enlighten me. I am not intending to come off knowing anymore than any of the rest of us but I am asking questions.

When was the last time someone like "that particular guy" intentionally targeted hundreds of mostly white, mostly young, mostly god-fearing American country music fans? I'm learning that he had been in that room for over a week. Waiting. Was he alone? And where did all the money come from?

This one doesn't fit neatly into anyone's agenda-filled box.

It's possibly to have a look at this from both «sides»: Both this character (and his background and motives) and why people in general have such an easy access to murder weapons and how they end up doing such horrible things, imo.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2017-10-04 17:20 by DandelionPowderman.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: Kurt ()
Date: October 4, 2017 17:24

Agreed.
It's pure EVIL behind this one.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: MisterDDDD ()
Date: October 4, 2017 17:39

Quote
Kurt
With all due respect, I will repeat myself...
this was a brutal massacre that intentionally targeted innocent American country music fans. @#$%& brutal.

I believe that we should focus on the investigation into the shooter, his motive, his acquaintance and whether or not he worked alone.
Was he radicalized?
Was he funded by others?
What about the reports of a note and videotapes of the crime itself taken from inside his room?

Instead of rushing to political sides of the coin and arguing about America and its laws, or mental illness, or race, why don't we talk more and openly about this particular guy.

Maybe if and when the truth comes out, we won't be able to neatly package it into our own political agendas?!

There has to be WAY MORE to this story than we've been told so far...

For what it's worth, reports today say he rented the same suites for a block of time during a similar festival featuring "Chance the Rapper" a few weeks ago. He changed his date/plan for unknown reasons.

That said, his motives are really secondary to the gun violence conversation/ reforms we need to be having now. It's undeniable that some sort of legislative action(s) needs to be taken. We all are aware that tighter gun controls will not save all the people killed by gun violence, but it undoubtably would save some.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: dcba ()
Date: October 4, 2017 17:40

The Onion has a good (and thought-inducing) one on this massacre :

"Those Close To Nation Say It Showed Dozens Of Warning Signs Leading Up To Massacre"
[www.theonion.com]

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: Redhotcarpet ()
Date: October 4, 2017 17:46

Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
Aquamarine
Quote
Redhotcarpet
Crying on national TV is not suitable for a president.
Obama after Sandy Hook. It told me that he genuinely cared about the whole incident and wanted to do something to effect change, even if he didn't ultimately succeed (which wasn't his fault).

I'm not sure there was anything anyone could have done to have totally prevented the Las Vegas attack, however. But it could have been made much more difficult, and that's what we should be aiming for.

thumbs up

You got a point. My point was more about being sentimental and pointing fingers as a president. Not what Obama did, that's true. thumbs up

As a Swede I still get the hick-ups when I hear about crying politicians. We lack pragmatic politicians.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: Kurt ()
Date: October 4, 2017 18:00

Quote
MisterDDDD

For what it's worth, reports today say he rented the same suites for a block of time during a similar festival featuring "Chance the Rapper" a few weeks ago. He changed his date/plan for unknown reasons.

That said, his motives are really secondary to the gun violence conversation/ reforms we need to be having now. It's undeniable that some sort of legislative action(s) needs to be taken. We all are aware that tighter gun controls will not save all the people killed by gun violence, but it undoubtably would save some.

Interesting development. Again, there are just WAY TOO many unanswered questions here.

He rented condos overlooking the 'Life is Beautiful' festival featuring "Chance the Rapper" yes. Also Lorde, Muse, Blink 182, Gorillaz, Wiz Khalifa, Cage the Elephant and dozens more.

So was this a test run?
Again, where was all the money coming from?
His motives simply cannot be secondary in this conversation.

Let's not rush to change any laws yet.
America seems to have a hard enough time enforcing the laws we already have.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: MisterDDDD ()
Date: October 4, 2017 18:31

Legislation to help prevent the gun violence wouldn't exactly be a "rush".





Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2017-10-04 18:34 by MisterDDDD.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: Kurt ()
Date: October 4, 2017 18:41

But look deeper into that chart if we all want to be honest here...
How many of those dead were claimed to be caused by radicalized terror groups?
And please don't give me any "workplace violence" claims.

What about anti-anxiety medications? Do you want to legislate away those?
What about certain religions? Do you want to legislate away those too?

Criminals will always find a way to get guns.
Terrorists will always find a way to get funding.

Enforce the laws on the books.
Let the police do their jobs.

I am waiting for more answers.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: lem motlow ()
Date: October 4, 2017 18:42

Quote
lem motlow
Quote
lem motlow
That's interesting Kurt.somebody on this very site told me yesterday that it couldn't be compared to a regular terrorist attack because the guns are so "easily available " a guy like this could just be having a bad day and reek havoc.uh,no-
People who know nothing about guns think full automatics are legal in Nevada because of those rusty old pre-86ers the gun ranges let the tourists shoot full auto is a federal crime 5-10 years in prison for a first offense.this guy was nuts but well financed.maybe our first millionaire psycho killer.
i

Let me try again-if you have a full auto machine gun type weapon in any of the fifty United States you will go to prison.now read my original post,I have it in quotes above.see where it says "rusty old pre- 86ers, a machine gun purchased before the law went into effect in 1986 is legal.those are the ones they let you shoot st the range.they are old and costly,up to 30,000 each.most are in the hands of collectors and you need to contact the atf before selling one.so let's be clear-full auto-prison
Paddock had a private plane he could've easily flown into the open air concert,that would've killed even more people.
The crime stats I mentioned in the inner cities came from an article in time magazine about the rising murder rates for the 2016 calendar year,I'll try to link it later.

I hate to keep quoting myself but AGAIN-it is not legal to own a fckng machine gun anywhere in the United States. It is the Hughes amendment to law 99-308,the firearm protection act of 1986 signed into law by president Reagan on may 19 1986-I address the old pre-86ers above.
I seriously doubt anyone who mass murders 50 or 100 people is worried about violating a gun law.50 counts of first degree murder but the threat of an illegal firearm charge will stop em, get real.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: keefriff99 ()
Date: October 4, 2017 18:44

Quote
Redhotcarpet
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
Aquamarine
Quote
Redhotcarpet
Crying on national TV is not suitable for a president.
Obama after Sandy Hook. It told me that he genuinely cared about the whole incident and wanted to do something to effect change, even if he didn't ultimately succeed (which wasn't his fault).

I'm not sure there was anything anyone could have done to have totally prevented the Las Vegas attack, however. But it could have been made much more difficult, and that's what we should be aiming for.

thumbs up

You got a point. My point was more about being sentimental and pointing fingers as a president. Not what Obama did, that's true. thumbs up

As a Swede I still get the hick-ups when I hear about crying politicians. We lack pragmatic politicians.
Obama didn't exactly cry...he rolled a couple of tears while talking. He didn't choke up or have to stop speaking. It was still a powerful moment.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: ryanpow ()
Date: October 4, 2017 18:48

By that logic why go the trouble of putting in fire protection in buildings? Let the Fire Department do their job.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: Kurt ()
Date: October 4, 2017 18:55

Quote
ryanpow
By that logic why go the trouble of putting in fire protection in buildings? Let the Fire Department do their job.

Please. Don't take it to illogical comparisons.

And believe me, I would much rather be discussing how amazing the current tour is rather than this topic.
But, to me, this topic is too damn important to ignore.
Talk amongst yourselves...I'm out for awhile.

The No Filter Tour is truly amazing though!

smileys with beer

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: ryanpow ()
Date: October 4, 2017 18:58

It's perfectly sound logic. But I can agree to disagree.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: MisterDDDD ()
Date: October 4, 2017 19:07

Quote
lem motlow
I hate to keep quoting myself but AGAIN-it is not legal to own a fckng machine gun anywhere in the United States.

I hate to keep proving this statement incorrect AGAIN-

""Nevada has some of the most relaxed gun laws in the country, a legislative condition that is sure to come under renewed scrutiny in the wake of the worst mass shooting in U.S. history on Sunday night in Las Vegas.

Nevada law does not require firearms owners to have licenses or register their weapons, nor does it limit the number of firearms an individual posses.

Automatic assault weapons and machine guns are also legal in the state as long as they are registered and possessed in adherence to federal law, according to the National Rifle Association.

Nevada does not prohibit the transfer or possession of assault weapons, 50-caliber rifles or large-capacity ammunition magazines. Local law enforcement issues concealed handgun licenses. Open carry is legal without a permit.
Initial reports on social media appear to have shown that lone-wolf shooter Stephen Paddock used a high-caliber automatic weapon in the Las Vegas shooting. In shared footage of the attack, scores of rounds of ammunition can be heard going off in a matter of seconds.

Such weapons were previously prohibited under the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban, which expired in 2004. Several lawmakers have attempted to renew the ban, coming closest, but still failing, after the Newtown school shooting in 2012."
[www.newsweek.com]

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: wonderboy ()
Date: October 4, 2017 19:08

Problem with gun control laws is that you have to take guns away from mostly law abiding white people because you think it will reduce the crime in certain black neighborhoods.
Just don't think that's possible unless gun owners buy in. Don't think they are going to do it unless it's tied to an honest conversation about gun violence.
...
America is not consistent regarding prohibition of dangerous things. There is a move to prohibit guns; at the same time there is a movement to legalize recreational drugs and there has been a concerted effort to push pain medication by drug companies.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: MisterDDDD ()
Date: October 4, 2017 19:10

Quote
ryanpow
By that logic why go the trouble of putting in fire protection in buildings? Let the Fire Department do their job.

"One failed attempt at a shoe bomb and we all take off our shoes at the airport. Thirty-one school shootings since Columbine and no change in our regulation of guns." -- John Oliver

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: TooTough ()
Date: October 4, 2017 19:12

That´s so sick. This says it all:

[www.gunviolencearchive.org]









Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2017-10-04 19:19 by TooTough.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: MisterDDDD ()
Date: October 4, 2017 19:15

Quote
wonderboy
Problem with gun control laws is that you have to take guns away from mostly law abiding white people because you think it will reduce the crime in certain black neighborhoods.
Just don't think that's possible unless gun owners buy in. Don't think they are going to do it unless it's tied to an honest conversation about gun violence.
...
America is not consistent regarding prohibition of dangerous things. There is a move to prohibit guns; at the same time there is a movement to legalize recreational drugs and there has been a concerted effort to push pain medication by drug companies.

Ridiculous.
By far the majority of mass gun murders in the US have been committed by white males. The racist blame the scary black guy theory doesn't fly.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: MileHigh ()
Date: October 4, 2017 19:15

Quote
MisterDDDD
Legislation to help prevent the gun violence wouldn't exactly be a "rush".


And those numbers are horrible, but the reality is they are a drop in the bucket if you are going to classify very similar behaviours in the same way. If you take the point of view that it's not the gun that is at the root of the problem but it is the person, then that expanded discussion literally never happens in a mainstream way and for all practical intents and purposes it is being suppressed. It's a really sad and skewed state of affairs. The press has a fiduciary responsibility to report the truth and discuss patterns in crime for the public safety and for the common good and so that people can adjust their behaviour accordingly and they don't do it. And it's too easy to get all upset about even raising the issue and forgetting about the thousands and thousands of victims that are out there.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: wonderboy ()
Date: October 4, 2017 19:24

Quote
MisterDDDD
Quote
wonderboy
Problem with gun control laws is that you have to take guns away from mostly law abiding white people because you think it will reduce the crime in certain black neighborhoods.
Just don't think that's possible unless gun owners buy in. Don't think they are going to do it unless it's tied to an honest conversation about gun violence.
...
America is not consistent regarding prohibition of dangerous things. There is a move to prohibit guns; at the same time there is a movement to legalize recreational drugs and there has been a concerted effort to push pain medication by drug companies.

Ridiculous.
By far the majority of mass gun murders in the US have been committed by white males. The racist blame the scary black guy theory doesn't fly.


See, it's *racist* to point out that the a disproportionate number of gun violence is centered in the black community. That's why this discussion is going nowhere in the U.S. ... Meanwhile, the mostly good people in those communities suffer because we can't talk about their situation.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: MileHigh ()
Date: October 4, 2017 19:25

Quote
MisterDDDD
Quote
wonderboy
Problem with gun control laws is that you have to take guns away from mostly law abiding white people because you think it will reduce the crime in certain black neighborhoods.
Just don't think that's possible unless gun owners buy in. Don't think they are going to do it unless it's tied to an honest conversation about gun violence.
...
America is not consistent regarding prohibition of dangerous things. There is a move to prohibit guns; at the same time there is a movement to legalize recreational drugs and there has been a concerted effort to push pain medication by drug companies.

Ridiculous.
By far the majority of mass gun murders in the US have been committed by white males. The racist blame the scary black guy theory doesn't fly.

By what metric? Do you think it's fair to say that a person that kills three or more people with a gun in one instance or a person that kills three or more people with a gun over a career in crime is a mass murderer? I think it is fair to say that. If you accept that metric then things change completely and radically and of course it becomes hard information that many people have a very hard time digesting. It's sort of a variation on the "Rotherham effect." I really hope it changes one day so that we can direct our energies such that we make the world a better place for all.

Re: OT: Las Vegas concert shooting
Posted by: lem motlow ()
Date: October 4, 2017 19:32

MrDDD,please read something besides that same misleading Newsweek article that you keep repeating over and over.you do realize the news media can't be trusted,right? What they are doing is conflating to different things, the pre86 grandfathered in guns that, as I explained are mostly in the hands of collectors and gun ranges that let tourists shoot them.they are also very expensive,up to $30,000 apiece and you need to get paperwork from the ATF to sell them.

Either from shoddy reporting or being deliberately dishonest Newsweek is giving the impression you can go out and buy a full automatic machine gun in Nevada.You Cannot! I even gave you the legislation and the date it was signed into law-big surprise, the media mislead you.

Goto Page: PreviousFirst...23456789101112Next
Current Page: 7 of 12


This Thread has been closed

Online Users

Guests: 1603
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 6295 on November 30, 2021 14:09

Previous page Next page First page IORR home