Hope it's Zeppelin and I get to be there. Would be amazing if they could do a performance like the O2. I thought it was fantastic, and of course not 1973. But there are people on this board that would defend The Stones in this same type of case. Suppose it boils down to who and what you like. Myself, I like a reunion and it's fine to call it Led Zeppelin.

Quote
StonedInTokyo

Quote
vertigojoe
According to this logic the stones ended in 1969

Quote
Spodlumt
Anyone's chance of seeing Led Zeppelin play live again ended in September of 1980.Accept it. Enjoy the records and videos. But remember - there is no going back. No substitutes, no "almosts." There is no way to get back.

Comparing The Rolling Stones to (the demise of) Led Zeppelin is an apples to oranges comparison. For one thing, Brian Jones was no longer in the group when he died. For another, Led Zeppelin was only ever comprised of the four original members and none were ever replaced.

So if The Stones can replace several members, why can't Zeppelin replace one?