For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Strike
There is no need to worry bout getting tickets. We are not talking bout Vegas, if you are willing to pay 799€ for a pit ticket, no problem to get one. All shows are far from being sold out, so in a few weeks there will be tons of tickets available for all german shows.
Quote
slewan
well, I guess there will be a nice combination on lucky dippers and unlucky "Depps"*. Since the latter will find out that some of the former that are sitting next to them payed 90% less than they did.
* "Depp" is a German word for "idiot"
Quote
grzegorz67Quote
Strike
There is no need to worry bout getting tickets. We are not talking bout Vegas, if you are willing to pay 799€ for a pit ticket, no problem to get one. All shows are far from being sold out, so in a few weeks there will be tons of tickets available for all german shows.
Do you know that for sure? Hamburg in particular, the biggest of the 3 venues by far seems ludicrous to be a claimed fast sellout at the asking prices. I'll be in the City, hoping for Silver Pit or Floor Seating at a reasonable price. 800EUR for a Pit is obscene, even for this tour.
As I said before, rich pickings for Lucky Dippers and maybe that's their plan - the pronoter thinks they can make more cash from a combo of Die Hards willing to Stump up the 800EUR and the gaps filled by Lucky Dippers than selling the lot for say, 300EUR. Also, not many touts (scalpers) will gamble on turning a profit on 800EUR tickets!
Quote
shattered
Are you going to any shows?
Quote
Cristiano RadtkeQuote
shattered
Are you going to any shows?
Me? I wish I could.
On any case I already got my FOCS* tickets for every concert of this tour. I also have some spare free FOCS* tickets for those who want it.
*Front Of Computer Screen
Quote
bisonvodka
Nobody is surprised that Mick is in good shape. So can't wait till opening night.
Quote
Thommie
... Yeah, and I think Keith will do Let's Work in his set...
Quote
hopkins
He looks just great. just super. wow, mid seventies huh? purty sharp there kid!!!
Quote
Rockman
.... be way fun if they perform Gotta Get a Grip ....
Quote
Monsoon RagoonQuote
Rockman
.... be way fun if they perform Gotta Get a Grip ....
Not impossible. It's (almost) a Stones recording with more band members involved than on Happy for instance. Comparable with some tracks on ABB which miss Ronnie. Although not of the best 150 Stones recordings and with the typical MJ solo mix.
Quote
mtaylorQuote
Monsoon RagoonQuote
Rockman
.... be way fun if they perform Gotta Get a Grip ....
Not impossible. It's (almost) a Stones recording with more band members involved than on Happy or Play With Fire for instance. Comparable with some tracks on ABB which miss Ronnie. Although not of the best 150 Stones recordings and with the typical MJ solo mix.
Have they ever played "solo" contributions live before?
It is a Jagger song, not a Stones song.
Quote
Rockman
.... be way fun if they perform Gotta Get a Grip ....
Quote
Hairball
Since Keith refused to play on either of Micks new solo tunes, why would anyone think that he and the Stones would play them live?
Unless Keith is given a backstage break (the same way Mick does during Keith's spot), there's zero chance of this happening, and even if he did take a break chances are very slim.
There might have been a better chance of Keith playing a tune from Crosseyed Heart during his solo spot at recent Stones shows, but even that didn't happen.
_______________________________________________________________
Almost exactly month until tour starts...rehearsals starting soon...looking forward to reading all the reports, and hopefully there will be some live periscope feeds for those of us who will not be attending any shows.
For those who are, have a splendid time!!!
Quote
Monsoon RagoonQuote
Hairball
Since Keith refused to play on either of Micks new solo tunes, why would anyone think that he and the Stones would play them live?
Unless Keith is given a backstage break (the same way Mick does during Keith's spot), there's zero chance of this happening, and even if he did take a break chances are very slim.
There might have been a better chance of Keith playing a tune from Crosseyed Heart during his solo spot at recent Stones shows, but even that didn't happen.
_______________________________________________________________
Almost exactly month until tour starts...rehearsals starting soon...looking forward to reading all the reports, and hopefully there will be some live periscope feeds for those of us who will not be attending any shows.
For those who are, have a splendid time!!!
At 73, he doesn't cross the Atlantic for such little things. He also wasn't present when they got that award in April.
Quote
HairballQuote
Monsoon RagoonQuote
Hairball
Since Keith refused to play on either of Micks new solo tunes, why would anyone think that he and the Stones would play them live?
Unless Keith is given a backstage break (the same way Mick does during Keith's spot), there's zero chance of this happening, and even if he did take a break chances are very slim.
There might have been a better chance of Keith playing a tune from Crosseyed Heart during his solo spot at recent Stones shows, but even that didn't happen.
_______________________________________________________________
Almost exactly month until tour starts...rehearsals starting soon...looking forward to reading all the reports, and hopefully there will be some live periscope feeds for those of us who will not be attending any shows.
For those who are, have a splendid time!!!
At 73, he doesn't cross the Atlantic for such little things. He also wasn't present when they got that award in April.
What does that have to do with whether or not the Stones would play Micks new solo tunes live?
Not sure what you're referring to with "such little things"- the fact that Keith refused to play on Mick's tunes? Supposedly they were presented to the band first and Keith said no thanks.
Had he opted to play on them, it would have been under the name the Rolling Stones. But since Keith opted out, Mick recorded them as solo (w/Ronnie and Charlie), and the end result is two new Mick solo tunes.
Quote
Monsoon RagoonQuote
HairballQuote
Monsoon RagoonQuote
Hairball
Since Keith refused to play on either of Micks new solo tunes, why would anyone think that he and the Stones would play them live?
Unless Keith is given a backstage break (the same way Mick does during Keith's spot), there's zero chance of this happening, and even if he did take a break chances are very slim.
There might have been a better chance of Keith playing a tune from Crosseyed Heart during his solo spot at recent Stones shows, but even that didn't happen.
_______________________________________________________________
Almost exactly month until tour starts...rehearsals starting soon...looking forward to reading all the reports, and hopefully there will be some live periscope feeds for those of us who will not be attending any shows.
For those who are, have a splendid time!!!
At 73, he doesn't cross the Atlantic for such little things. He also wasn't present when they got that award in April.
What does that have to do with whether or not the Stones would play Micks new solo tunes live?
Not sure what you're referring to with "such little things"- the fact that Keith refused to play on Mick's tunes? Supposedly they were presented to the band first and Keith said no thanks.
Had he opted to play on them, it would have been under the name the Rolling Stones. But since Keith opted out, Mick recorded them as solo (w/Ronnie and Charlie), and the end result is two new Mick solo tunes.
I was referring on your first sentence. Where do you have the information from?