Just ok quality here.

[www.youtube.com]

They look tired.

My 1st Stones gig. I wish the full show existed.

sc uk

Just curious, if the quality is not so good, why is it called 'proshot' ?

It was originally professionally shot, but this version is a copie of a copie on not a very good video tape.

Because the tape is from a multi generational source, meaning copy of a copy of a copy etc, that accounts for the degradation in quality and the Pro-Shot comes from the fact that the original source was a professional multi camera, vision mixed recording, authorized by the band for broadcast on internal Video Screens or Television as in a Pay Per View or future DVD/BD/4K release.

Later on in this recording on my version you see the camera people filming each other after the concert and they are using TV Camera's of the era.

Quote
SKILLS
Because the tape is from a multi generational source, meaning copy of a copy of a copy etc, that accounts for the degradation in quality and the Pro-Shot comes from the fact that the original source was a professional multi camera, vision mixed recording, authorized by the band for broadcast on internal Video Screens or Television as in a Pay Per View or future DVD/BD/4K release.

As far as I can recall this was the first time that they'd used a monster video screen. It was off to start with, and then shortly into the show Mick said something about television screen, and it came on only to show something boring from television. He then said let's see what else there is, and the screen then showed the live shot from stage - to a huge ovation from everyone (not least those at the distant far end of the Stadium).

We take these things for granted now, but it really was something to behold the first time!

--
Captain Corella
60 Years a Fan

Quote
CaptainCorella

Quote
SKILLS
Because the tape is from a multi generational source, meaning copy of a copy of a copy etc, that accounts for the degradation in quality and the Pro-Shot comes from the fact that the original source was a professional multi camera, vision mixed recording, authorized by the band for broadcast on internal Video Screens or Television as in a Pay Per View or future DVD/BD/4K release.

As far as I can recall this was the first time that they'd used a monster video screen. It was off to start with, and then shortly into the show Mick said something about television screen, and it came on only to show something boring from television. He then said let's see what else there is, and the screen then showed the live shot from stage - to a huge ovation from everyone (not least those at the distant far end of the Stadium).

We take these things for granted now, but it really was something to behold the first time!

Seems like U2 stole that bit for the 1992/93 ZooTV tour.

I think Wembley '82 was when Keith said (in his book - or maybe it was Ronnie's) that he f#%ked up the intro to 'She's So Cold', and Ronnie failed to cover for him, so Keith went over and punched him.

Too bad it doesn't show up on the video. (Too many close-ups - mostly of Mick)

I was down the front. Keith never punched Ronnie. This incident was a figment of Nick Kent's imagination.

Sc uk

Quote
GJV
It was originally professionally shot, but this version is a copie of a copie on not a very good video tape.

The video looks like the screen videos from that tour (see Roundhay Park), where the cameras focused on the band members faces, rather than the stage or their instruments

Wouldn't call it pro-shot.

Quote
mosthigh
I think Wembley '82 was when Keith said (in his book - or maybe it was Ronnie's) that he f#%ked up the intro to 'She's So Cold', and Ronnie failed to cover for him, so Keith went over and punched him.

Too bad it doesn't show up on the video. (Too many close-ups - mostly of Mick)

As seen in the video, that never happened. And... it never happened.

Quote
GasLightStreet

Quote
mosthigh
I think Wembley '82 was when Keith said (in his book - or maybe it was Ronnie's) that he f#%ked up the intro to 'She's So Cold', and Ronnie failed to cover for him, so Keith went over and punched him.

Too bad it doesn't show up on the video. (Too many close-ups - mostly of Mick)

As seen in the video, that never happened. And... it never happened.

And Keith never said it in his book. Nick Kent wrote it. He also claimed Keith did a 20 minute protest solo in the cherry picker during YCAGWYW in Sweden.

A vivid imagination

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
GasLightStreet

Quote
mosthigh
I think Wembley '82 was when Keith said (in his book - or maybe it was Ronnie's) that he f#%ked up the intro to 'She's So Cold', and Ronnie failed to cover for him, so Keith went over and punched him.

Too bad it doesn't show up on the video. (Too many close-ups - mostly of Mick)

As seen in the video, that never happened. And... it never happened.

And Keith never said it in his book. Nick Kent wrote it. He also claimed Keith did a 20 minute protest solo in the cherry picker during YCAGWYW in Sweden.

A vivid imagination

Ah, yes, the "protest solo". Apparently Keith protested at the same spot every night seeing that he played 50 (sometimes 60) minute solos for every performances of that song in 1981 but somehow managed to edit it down to just 20 minutes for the 1982 tour.

Quote
mosthigh
I think Wembley '82 was when Keith said (in his book - or maybe it was Ronnie's) that he f#%ked up the intro to 'She's So Cold', and Ronnie failed to cover for him, so Keith went over and punched him.

Too bad it doesn't show up on the video. (Too many close-ups - mostly of Mick)

Wasnt that in Leeds? Whatever happened he did strangle Ronnie in the 90s.

Quote
mosthigh
I think Wembley '82 was when Keith said (in his book - or maybe it was Ronnie's) that he f#%ked up the intro to 'She's So Cold', and Ronnie failed to cover for him, so Keith went over and punched him.

Too bad it doesn't show up on the video. (Too many close-ups - mostly of Mick)

It wasn't just the intro that went wrong, the entire song is a train wreck. Bill Wyman's look as the band struggle on is priceless.

Quote
Father Ted

Quote
mosthigh
I think Wembley '82 was when Keith said (in his book - or maybe it was Ronnie's) that he f#%ked up the intro to 'She's So Cold', and Ronnie failed to cover for him, so Keith went over and punched him.

Too bad it doesn't show up on the video. (Too many close-ups - mostly of Mick)

It wasn't just the intro that went wrong, the entire song is a train wreck. Bill Wyman's look as the band struggle on is priceless.

It started with the intro, and after several attempts of getting it together – where all the band members involved tried to adjust – it looked like they just gave up and let it rip. And voila! They were back on track.

A priceless recording

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
Father Ted

Quote
mosthigh
I think Wembley '82 was when Keith said (in his book - or maybe it was Ronnie's) that he f#%ked up the intro to 'She's So Cold', and Ronnie failed to cover for him, so Keith went over and punched him.

Too bad it doesn't show up on the video. (Too many close-ups - mostly of Mick)

It wasn't just the intro that went wrong, the entire song is a train wreck. Bill Wyman's look as the band struggle on is priceless.

It started with the intro, and after several attempts of getting it together – where all the band members involved tried to adjust – it looked like they just gave up and let it rip. And voila! They were back on track.

A priceless recording

They can keep this show in the vault

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
GJV
It was originally professionally shot, but this version is a copie of a copie on not a very good video tape.

The video looks like the screen videos from that tour (see Roundhay Park), where the cameras focused on the band members faces, rather than the stage or their instruments

Wouldn't call it pro-shot.

Dare I say some of the worst produced camera angles ever , I don't think Hal Ashby was involved anymore like on the US leg in 1981.

Quote
TheGreek

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
GJV
It was originally professionally shot, but this version is a copie of a copie on not a very good video tape.

The video looks like the screen videos from that tour (see Roundhay Park), where the cameras focused on the band members faces, rather than the stage or their instruments

Wouldn't call it pro-shot.

Dare I say some of the worst produced camera angles ever , I don't think Hal Ashby was involved anymore like on the US leg in 1981.

If you watch Roundhay Park it looks suspiciously similar to this. I'd say it's the crew filming for the big screen. And that concept was fairly new...

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
TheGreek

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
GJV
It was originally professionally shot, but this version is a copie of a copie on not a very good video tape.

The video looks like the screen videos from that tour (see Roundhay Park), where the cameras focused on the band members faces, rather than the stage or their instruments

Wouldn't call it pro-shot.

Dare I say some of the worst produced camera angles ever , I don't think Hal Ashby was involved anymore like on the US leg in 1981.

If you watch Roundhay Park it looks suspiciously similar to this. I'd say it's the crew filming for the big screen. And that concept was fairly new...

Exactly , to me it's a damn shame about Roundhay Park because the Stones playing is ferocious and on fire only to be ruined and wasted by the camera work .I guess it's okay if you are there in person but for those of us watching this at home makes me want to scream .How many facial close ups can we tolerate after all and a lot of the times the close ups are not even the band members who are in the spotlight for a fill or a verse with the vocals .

Quote
TheGreek

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
TheGreek

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
GJV
It was originally professionally shot, but this version is a copie of a copie on not a very good video tape.

The video looks like the screen videos from that tour (see Roundhay Park), where the cameras focused on the band members faces, rather than the stage or their instruments

Wouldn't call it pro-shot.

Dare I say some of the worst produced camera angles ever , I don't think Hal Ashby was involved anymore like on the US leg in 1981.

If you watch Roundhay Park it looks suspiciously similar to this. I'd say it's the crew filming for the big screen. And that concept was fairly new...

Exactly , to me it's a damn shame about Roundhay Park because the Stones playing is ferocious and on fire only to be ruined and wasted by the camera work .I guess it's okay if you are there in person but for those of us watching this at home makes me want to scream .How many facial close ups can we tolerate after all and a lot of the times the close ups are not even the band members who are in the spotlight for a fill or a verse with the vocals .

How many gray Bill Wyman hairs could we tolerate?

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
TheGreek

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
TheGreek

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
GJV
It was originally professionally shot, but this version is a copie of a copie on not a very good video tape.

The video looks like the screen videos from that tour (see Roundhay Park), where the cameras focused on the band members faces, rather than the stage or their instruments

Wouldn't call it pro-shot.

Dare I say some of the worst produced camera angles ever , I don't think Hal Ashby was involved anymore like on the US leg in 1981.

If you watch Roundhay Park it looks suspiciously similar to this. I'd say it's the crew filming for the big screen. And that concept was fairly new...

Exactly , to me it's a damn shame about Roundhay Park because the Stones playing is ferocious and on fire only to be ruined and wasted by the camera work .I guess it's okay if you are there in person but for those of us watching this at home makes me want to scream .How many facial close ups can we tolerate after all and a lot of the times the close ups are not even the band members who are in the spotlight for a fill or a verse with the vocals .

How many gray Bill Wyman hairs could we tolerate?

I actually miss Bill Wyman (no knock on Daryl )

Quote
TheGreek

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
TheGreek

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
TheGreek

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
GJV
It was originally professionally shot, but this version is a copie of a copie on not a very good video tape.

The video looks like the screen videos from that tour (see Roundhay Park), where the cameras focused on the band members faces, rather than the stage or their instruments

Wouldn't call it pro-shot.

Dare I say some of the worst produced camera angles ever , I don't think Hal Ashby was involved anymore like on the US leg in 1981.

If you watch Roundhay Park it looks suspiciously similar to this. I'd say it's the crew filming for the big screen. And that concept was fairly new...

Exactly , to me it's a damn shame about Roundhay Park because the Stones playing is ferocious and on fire only to be ruined and wasted by the camera work .I guess it's okay if you are there in person but for those of us watching this at home makes me want to scream .How many facial close ups can we tolerate after all and a lot of the times the close ups are not even the band members who are in the spotlight for a fill or a verse with the vocals .

How many gray Bill Wyman hairs could we tolerate?

I actually miss Bill Wyman (no knock on Daryl )

We all do