For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
JJHMick
Typical jazz critique: technique, technics, mashinerism and nothing human.
No word about whether the audience liked it and will visit their Big Band on future occasions because they never bothered about them before...
No word about the song choice - let's compare to Tim Ries doing 'Faction', maybe those hailed Big Bandits fail in comparison?!
Who cares about the car, it's still the driver who's the star.
Quote
corriecasQuote
JJHMick
Typical jazz critique: technique, technics, mashinerism and nothing human.
No word about whether the audience liked it and will visit their Big Band on future occasions because they never bothered about them before...
No word about the song choice - let's compare to Tim Ries doing 'Faction', maybe those hailed Big Bandits fail in comparison?!
Who cares about the car, it's still the driver who's the star.
Having listened to it fully, it s too much Jazz for me. I dont wanna go into the song choice. you have to listen to it yourself, or go on with your chitter chatter.
jeroen
Quote
JJHMickQuote
corriecasQuote
JJHMick
Typical jazz critique: technique, technics, mashinerism and nothing human.
No word about whether the audience liked it and will visit their Big Band on future occasions because they never bothered about them before...
No word about the song choice - let's compare to Tim Ries doing 'Faction', maybe those hailed Big Bandits fail in comparison?!
Who cares about the car, it's still the driver who's the star.
Having listened to it fully, it s too much Jazz for me. I dont wanna go into the song choice. you have to listen to it yourself, or go on with your chitter chatter.
jeroen
I will buy it (reason see below, it's not about being a completist) and I will find it as too much Jazz to me too. Actually I liked the Keltner project and put on Tim Ries from time to time but find Zwingenberger rather boring on cd (but not live!).
Jazz was hot and sweaty but turned into classical music, even the art of improvisation got lost. That is my main critique and it is a statement by a very well known Jazz bassist from Germany. Too much technical abilities make things sterile. They avoid mistakes by doing it the clean way whereas the Stones avoid mistakes by sticking to the sloppy way instead of giving it a try.
The difference to Charlie's past works here is that he plays his own material or such he is very familar with. That makes me curious.
Quote
liddas
But assuming, for the sake of discussion, that indeed it is limited, does anybody here seriously believe that it is so because Charlie Watts can't do any better? Of course he can/could!!! As a matter of fact, Charlie's style is what he wants it to be. If he wanted to be a Søren Frost, he could easily have been a Søren Frost.
Sorry but no way. Do you really believe this?
5 I haven't yet met a jazz drummer or other "technical" drummer (and I know lots of them) who knows Charlie Watts and does not admire him / see the greatness in his drumming
Unfortunatey as a musician I met a lot of them. And coming from rock drummers too.
He has a very nice style of his own and I like it.But I couldn't imagine many other Rockbands wher he could fit or deliver.