For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
bigmac7895
Is there a place to hear that version of SFTD from 75 with Clapton?
Quote
bigmac7895
To think I thought I knew the Stones better than this. I didn't know Clapton guested in 75 nor did I know Santana did also [youtu.be]
Quote
MadMax
Just to add a question, will there EVER be a second show where they decide not to play neither Flash nor Satisfaction? Up until now there has only been one show without them two Babies (after arriving of course, -65 and -68) in the history.
Leaving Satisfaction off the No Security tour setlist was a somewhat bold move, but all the other warhorses remained.Quote
HalfNankerQuote
MadMax
Just to add a question, will there EVER be a second show where they decide not to play neither Flash nor Satisfaction? Up until now there has only been one show without them two Babies (after arriving of course, -65 and -68) in the history.
no
too many fans there to hear just those two songs!
Its too late now, but they should have done a tour where they played some shows "just for the fanatics" like us. Ticket buyers would know in advance they were not going to get the hits and the nuts like us would be thrilled to pay for the privilege of being there.
I wonder how well such a show woould sell? Would they sell out MSG or would it have to be a roseland ballroom type gig?
What show was this?Quote
MadMax
Just to add a question, will there EVER be a second show where they decide not to play neither Flash nor Satisfaction? Up until now there has only been one show without them two Babies (after arriving of course, -65 and -68) in the history.
Quote
rebelhipiWhat show was this?Quote
MadMax
Just to add a question, will there EVER be a second show where they decide not to play neither Flash nor Satisfaction? Up until now there has only been one show without them two Babies (after arriving of course, -65 and -68) in the history.
They did play Satisfaction though.Quote
crholmstromQuote
rebelhipiWhat show was this?Quote
MadMax
Just to add a question, will there EVER be a second show where they decide not to play neither Flash nor Satisfaction? Up until now there has only been one show without them two Babies (after arriving of course, -65 and -68) in the history.
no JJF at the Enmore in Sydney, the one where Angus & Malcom Young played. & Angus pushed Mick out of the way to do his solo, causing much mirth with the rest of the band. i think even Mick was laughing.
Quote
hopkinsQuote
bigmac7895
To think I thought I knew the Stones better than this. I didn't know Clapton guested in 75 nor did I know Santana did also [youtu.be]
That show was pretty kookie; They had bare-chested hand drummers in huge lines streaming down the aisles for this one;
all that samba percussion and no Chuck to trigger a sample
At the kickoff The big lotus flower blossomed and there they were;
the last time out in '72 there had been no special stage...
...the place was rotten with jet set up front; Bianca was prominent;
almost a little too hip and glam in a way. a LOT of other Big rock stars
were there to see this show too...
I think they sold it out very many days in a row and knocked them all out day by day with no break day in between for a week. consecutive sold out nights.
...the ticket demand was every bit as hysterical as today
tho it was the sonic benefit of an arena to be enjoyed, not stadium; the sound hit you and stuck around...i remember it pretty well; it was very very different
from 3 years previous when I saw them in the same room.
Quote
keefriff99Leaving Satisfaction off the No Security tour setlist was a somewhat bold move, but all the other warhorses remained.Quote
HalfNankerQuote
MadMax
Just to add a question, will there EVER be a second show where they decide not to play neither Flash nor Satisfaction? Up until now there has only been one show without them two Babies (after arriving of course, -65 and -68) in the history.
no
too many fans there to hear just those two songs!
Its too late now, but they should have done a tour where they played some shows "just for the fanatics" like us. Ticket buyers would know in advance they were not going to get the hits and the nuts like us would be thrilled to pay for the privilege of being there.
I wonder how well such a show woould sell? Would they sell out MSG or would it have to be a roseland ballroom type gig?
The Licks tour had amazing setlists, but the warhorses were always played. The Stones simply aren't an artsy, expectations-subverting kind of band that's going to play esoteric, scrambled up setlists for die-hards.
Even Springsteen plays Born To Run every show no matter what.
Quote
LazarusSmithQuote
hopkinsQuote
bigmac7895
To think I thought I knew the Stones better than this. I didn't know Clapton guested in 75 nor did I know Santana did also [youtu.be]
That show was pretty kookie; They had bare-chested hand drummers in huge lines streaming down the aisles for this one;
all that samba percussion and no Chuck to trigger a sample
At the kickoff The big lotus flower blossomed and there they were;
the last time out in '72 there had been no special stage...
...the place was rotten with jet set up front; Bianca was prominent;
almost a little too hip and glam in a way. a LOT of other Big rock stars
were there to see this show too...
I think they sold it out very many days in a row and knocked them all out day by day with no break day in between for a week. consecutive sold out nights.
...the ticket demand was every bit as hysterical as today
tho it was the sonic benefit of an arena to be enjoyed, not stadium; the sound hit you and stuck around...i remember it pretty well; it was very very different
from 3 years previous when I saw them in the same room.
Can never read about the '75 tour w/o thinking about this gem from Bukowski in Creem:
"Jaggernaut: Wild Horse on a Plastic Phallus"
Quote
keefriff99
...The Licks tour had amazing setlists, but the warhorses were always played. The Stones simply aren't an artsy, expectations-subverting kind of band that's going to play esoteric, scrambled up setlists for die-hards.
Even Springsteen plays Born To Run every show no matter what.
Quote
hopkinsQuote
bigmac7895
Is there a place to hear that version of SFTD from 75 with Clapton?
audio's iffy but...there's K on bass rite from the gitgo; and onward to Ron & Eric; enjoy.
wasn't my best Stones show but I'm not complaining
[www.youtube.com]
Who says I'm counting those songs?Quote
Winning Ugly VXIIQuote
keefriff99Leaving Satisfaction off the No Security tour setlist was a somewhat bold move, but all the other warhorses remained.Quote
HalfNankerQuote
MadMax
Just to add a question, will there EVER be a second show where they decide not to play neither Flash nor Satisfaction? Up until now there has only been one show without them two Babies (after arriving of course, -65 and -68) in the history.
no
too many fans there to hear just those two songs!
Its too late now, but they should have done a tour where they played some shows "just for the fanatics" like us. Ticket buyers would know in advance they were not going to get the hits and the nuts like us would be thrilled to pay for the privilege of being there.
I wonder how well such a show woould sell? Would they sell out MSG or would it have to be a roseland ballroom type gig?
The Licks tour had amazing setlists, but the warhorses were always played. The Stones simply aren't an artsy, expectations-subverting kind of band that's going to play esoteric, scrambled up setlists for die-hards.
Even Springsteen plays Born To Run every show no matter what.
Miss You wasn't played on the No Security Tour either. No YCAGWYW or Satisfaction either.
Only 8 warhorses out of 20 to 21 songs. Unless you count BTMMR as a warhorse which it wasn't yet at that point in time.
"Midnight Rambler" made pretty much it's first post-1976 appearances besides '89/'90 and a few rare performances in '95. So,you can't count that just because it ended up being played more on future tours.