For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Hairball
That's right Bjorn - it's all related, and it's all relevant!
620 pages!!!
Quote
WitnessQuote
Hairball
That's right Bjorn - it's all related, and it's all relevant!
620 pages!!!
The post preceding mine discussed McCartney solo stuff only - with no Stones relevance, at all. That I call spamming this special thread. Do remember, you are on a Rolling Stones forum, not a Beatles forum. If you want to, create a Beatles forum of your own!
Quote
WitnessQuote
Hairball
That's right Bjorn - it's all related, and it's all relevant!
620 pages!!!
The post preceding mine discussed McCartney solo stuff only - with no Stones relevance, at all. That I call spamming this special thread. Do remember, you are on a Rolling Stones forum, not a Beatles forum. If you want to, create a Beatles forum of your own!
Quote
MisterDDDD
Stones album = Stones/Macca collab ..at best
It's actually just Paul guesting on a song, which he has on other performer's albums countless times. Not typically news or noteworthy though , unlike now when The Rolling Stones invite him to sit in.
Hope the hype and his minimal participation doesn't end up detracting from the what will undoubtably be an epic new Stones album.
Quote
MisterDDDD
Stones album = Stones/Macca collab ..at best
It's actually just Paul guesting on a song, which he has on other performer's albums countless times. Not typically news or noteworthy though , unlike now when The Rolling Stones invite him to sit in.
Hope the hype and his minimal participation doesn't end up detracting from the what will undoubtably be an epic new Stones album.
Quote
Bjorn
I have just bought a new record player. Vinyl. I am 56 years old and have been missing this shit for over 30 years.Just didn´t know it. It´s like finding my roots again.
Lots of emotions. Very mixed. Stones? A new record in may, june would make everything perfect.
Right now I´m playing the Cheap Trick-Dream Police-album. One dollar/pound/euro at the local "second-hand-dealer", or what you call it in english.
I really like it. But hope to be able to replace it soon. With a record that has Sir Paul on bass on one fantasic and unforgettable track!
Quote
WitnessQuote
MisterDDDD
Stones album = Stones/Macca collab ..at best
It's actually just Paul guesting on a song, which he has on other performer's albums countless times. Not typically news or noteworthy though , unlike now when The Rolling Stones invite him to sit in.
Hope the hype and his minimal participation doesn't end up detracting from the what will undoubtably be an epic new Stones album.
This, and not Hairball's ridiculous claim, is what this is all about. I guess motives are as much about publicity as about music for such a participation. Myself I fear though that the said hype will detract from the possible qualities of the album.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Why won't any of the Stones say anything, btw? An anonymous «Stones rep» is hardly a source to build a story on...
Quote
ProfessorWolf
...
like you i'm really looking forward to having a brand new stones album on vinyl to play
hopefully not at el mocambo prices
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Yeah, why confirm anything at all, anonymously? The Stones's reps should have refused to answer as well, imo.
Is this really the way they wanted to confirm that an album will come out soon?
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Why won't any of the Stones say anything, btw? An anonymous «Stones rep» is hardly a source to build a story on...
Quote
straycatuk
Let's hope Macca guests on a "Blues Cover" with tongue firmly in cheek by all
sc uk
Quote
Doxa
But I am afraid that the reality is a bit more boring, and nothing that extraordinary will happen (except the dude playing the bass).
Quote
doitywoikQuote
DandelionPowderman
Why won't any of the Stones say anything, btw? An anonymous «Stones rep» is hardly a source to build a story on...
I'm sure that Stones rep had at least strict instructions what not to say.
Quote
Doxa
The Stones representative mentions Macca playing on a "new song".
Quote
HairballQuote
doitywoikQuote
DandelionPowderman
Why won't any of the Stones say anything, btw? An anonymous «Stones rep» is hardly a source to build a story on...
I'm sure that Stones rep had at least strict instructions what not to say.
True.
Also interesting that many of the publications who wrote about this exciting news of a Macca-Stones collaboration, have also highlighted the fact that the Stones have not had a new album of originals since 2005.
It's become a story within an even bigger story...a subplot within the lenrthy twisted saga. Not sure it's something the band wanted any of the focus to be on, but here are some examples....18 years and counting....
- "The Stones, who have not issued a new album of original material since 2005’s “A Bigger Bang...” - Variety
- "The Beatles singer will play bass on one track of the untitled project, the first Stones LP of original material since 2005's A Bigger Bang" - Entertainment Weekly
- "...the untitled collection will be the veteran band’s first new studio album of new songs since 2005’s A Bigger Bang". - Billboard
- "Variety reports that the Stones project — which will mark their first album of new material since 2005’s ‘A Bigger Bang’ — is currently in the mixing phase". - NME
Quote
Spud
Me too..
..but if they also knocked out another Blue & Lonesome one lunchtime...I'd be quite happy
Quote
ProfessorWolfQuote
Bjorn
I have just bought a new record player. Vinyl. I am 56 years old and have been missing this shit for over 30 years.Just didn´t know it. It´s like finding my roots again.
Lots of emotions. Very mixed. Stones? A new record in may, june would make everything perfect.
Right now I´m playing the Cheap Trick-Dream Police-album. One dollar/pound/euro at the local "second-hand-dealer", or what you call it in english.
I really like it. But hope to be able to replace it soon. With a record that has Sir Paul on bass on one fantasic and unforgettable track!
well in america we call them thrift stores
nice find by the way
thing about thrift stores is they usually don't sort the wheat from the chaff
last month i picked up a good mono copy of aftermath for 50 cents
and last week i found a good condition copy of "i'm jimmy reed" for the same price
but i had to sort thru what seemed to be hundreds and hundreds of barbara streisand and kenny rodgers records to find them
but it's worth it considering the prices of used vinyl at record shops nowadays
like you i'm really looking forward to having a brand new stones album on vinyl to play
hopefully not at el mocambo prices
Quote
slewanQuote
HairballQuote
doitywoikQuote
DandelionPowderman
Why won't any of the Stones say anything, btw? An anonymous «Stones rep» is hardly a source to build a story on...
I'm sure that Stones rep had at least strict instructions what not to say.
True.
Also interesting that many of the publications who wrote about this exciting news of a Macca-Stones collaboration, have also highlighted the fact that the Stones have not had a new album of originals since 2005.
It's become a story within an even bigger story...a subplot within the lenrthy twisted saga. Not sure it's something the band wanted any of the focus to be on, but here are some examples....18 years and counting....
- "The Stones, who have not issued a new album of original material since 2005’s “A Bigger Bang...” - Variety
- "The Beatles singer will play bass on one track of the untitled project, the first Stones LP of original material since 2005's A Bigger Bang" - Entertainment Weekly
- "...the untitled collection will be the veteran band’s first new studio album of new songs since 2005’s A Bigger Bang". - Billboard
- "Variety reports that the Stones project — which will mark their first album of new material since 2005’s ‘A Bigger Bang’ — is currently in the mixing phase". - NME
most likely the all have the same source and/or are copying from each other