Tell Me :
Talk
If they had gone those same people would criticize them for trying to steal the spotlight. It's no secret the guys are not particularly close to Bill socially.
They're closer socially than we think, I know that for a fact but I do think it was the right call not to attend. It would have stolen the spotlight and for once it was fantastic that the spotlight was on Bill.
I absolutely agree, and they did send the video message.
You should remember you are a guest here. If you don't enjoy the way it's run feel free to start your own site.
You should remember we are guests on earth. Guest but in my country I can express my opinion. If I understand you well, we have to agree with the moderator all the time.
I know it is the BV's website but this section is a forum and a forum is the place where people can't talk with different opinions. If not, it is a dictature. BV gives us his opinion and sometimes I am OK with him and sometimes not. That said, BV done a good work with his website.
I just think it's a rude dick move on your part and others to not only criticize bv here but to patronize him with this nonsense that he's not up to speed on Stones history.
YOU should remember we are guests on earth, particularly when posting to an 80th birthday celebration thread.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-10-30 14:14 by StonedInTokyo.
Actually Bill and Charlie are both close and not just because they both live in Chelsea (London). Their friendship has survived all the dramas and soap opera lifestyles.
...so they'll probably do something privately. I just think it's unrealistic to expect everyone in the band to drop everything to be there for Bill's birthday concert.
All wrong, this the reason why I have many good things to do that I stopped to see them live since 2007. It was loosing my time and money seeing the circus.
The fact to tell "just ignore any negative comments" means that all must be positive comments.
But perhaps you are like that in your live, always ok with the boss.
To say BV is only interested in current members is ridiculous! Why are you having a dig at BV? You're obviously trying to get a reaction which you have achieved. Well done
Je n'essaye rien du tout, c'est juste que si on a quelque de chose de negatif à emettre sur les stones, alors on ne doit pas le dire. Si ta sœur a acheté un tableau que tu trouves moche, tu vas dire qu'il est magnifique parce que tu te trouves chez elle. Ben mon vieux, t'es pas sorti.
Y a des types sur ce site qui vont te dire que le plus mauvais album Stones est meilleur que les perles enregistrées par n'importe qui d'autre. Démerdes toi avec un traducteur.
I don't need a traducteur, but I would say that about my sister's tableau, yes, because it's just being thoughtful. That's the only point here--being thoughtful and not insulting your host. Apart from that it seems to me you can say what you like. However moche it might be.
Thanks for these very instructive échanges. Good night, sleep tight comme disait l'autre!
Lovely! Thanks a lot!
Can we talk more about Bill in this thread?! Please! You can start a new thread if it's not about Bill, Stonesfan62. Please!
Also, let's not discuss the role of Mick Taylor here.
It really sounds like Bill's birthday party was a really-really special event. Let's not spoil the mood by posting about something that doesn't belong here. Please!
You're not human if you don't enjoy that a lot! (And that's allowing for the slightly off key singing!)
--
Captain Corella
60 Years a Fan
He just went full HOUSE FLY with that post. Where's the swatter?
You should be able to handle people being critical of your comments as well, no?
Like you said yourself, it's a forum where people speak their mind..
The fact that people disagree with you has nothing to do with dictatorship - they just disagree...
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-10-31 10:50 by DandelionPowderman.
Well, at start, I just said that we can't give negative opinions about Rolling Stones, that's all, I don't disagree people, I give only my opinion and after that, some people cry about those who are complaining.,If you are not OK with me, it was not the target, no problemo. When I read that some guys are always saying that on the last shows, they were better than ever, ouaf Happily they didn't seen them in 1973, they should had a heart attack. But I am certainly wrong, before 1990, the Stones weren't here.
Respect their opinions, and I'm sure they'll respect yours. There are people who like the latter-day Stones the most, just like many think they sucked after 1972.
Heck, many think they haven't really been good since Brian was there
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala @ O2 London
Posted by:
StonedInTokyo
()
Date: October 30, 2016 13:02
Quote
Rollin92
I think a lot of people, you could hear folks chatting afterwards, felt that there wasn't a good reason why they didn't show up.
If they had gone those same people would criticize them for trying to steal the spotlight. It's no secret the guys are not particularly close to Bill socially.
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala @ O2 London
Posted by:
Rollin92
()
Date: October 30, 2016 13:11
Quote
StonedInTokyoQuote
Rollin92
I think a lot of people, you could hear folks chatting afterwards, felt that there wasn't a good reason why they didn't show up.
If they had gone those same people would criticize them for trying to steal the spotlight. It's no secret the guys are not particularly close to Bill socially.
They're closer socially than we think, I know that for a fact but I do think it was the right call not to attend. It would have stolen the spotlight and for once it was fantastic that the spotlight was on Bill.
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala @ O2 London
Posted by:
StonedInTokyo
()
Date: October 30, 2016 13:18
Quote
Rollin92Quote
StonedInTokyoQuote
Rollin92
I think a lot of people, you could hear folks chatting afterwards, felt that there wasn't a good reason why they didn't show up.
If they had gone those same people would criticize them for trying to steal the spotlight. It's no secret the guys are not particularly close to Bill socially.
They're closer socially than we think, I know that for a fact but I do think it was the right call not to attend. It would have stolen the spotlight and for once it was fantastic that the spotlight was on Bill.
I absolutely agree, and they did send the video message.
Re: Why is it not a news item??????????????Bill gig!
Posted by:
StonedInTokyo
()
Date: October 30, 2016 13:25
Quote
mtaylorQuote
ouroux58Quote
stargroover
Just wondering why the Bill gig is not featured as an official news item?The last item was the Boston gig.
Because BV is only interested by current members of the Rolling Stones. If tomorrow, Charlie will quit the band, he'll forget him too and at that time you could tell what you want on him, he won't care if you're not a band memberb but not now, too early.
If the Stones stops after tomorrow (not all events on the same day), you couldn't tell anymore because he'll close the website. I enjoyed for all these years here but I think my last sentence was a suicide
BV should remember that BW together with CW was the backbone/ spine of Rolling Stones from 1962/1992. After that, not music has been produced as a such, just concerts based on the same old 20 warhorses.
You should remember you are a guest here. If you don't enjoy the way it's run feel free to start your own site.
Re: Why is it not a news item??????????????Bill gig!
Posted by:
ouroux58
()
Date: October 30, 2016 14:02
Quote
StonedInTokyoQuote
mtaylorQuote
ouroux58Quote
stargroover
Just wondering why the Bill gig is not featured as an official news item?The last item was the Boston gig.
Because BV is only interested by current members of the Rolling Stones. If tomorrow, Charlie will quit the band, he'll forget him too and at that time you could tell what you want on him, he won't care if you're not a band memberb but not now, too early.
If the Stones stops after tomorrow (not all events on the same day), you couldn't tell anymore because he'll close the website. I enjoyed for all these years here but I think my last sentence was a suicide
BV should remember that BW together with CW was the backbone/ spine of Rolling Stones from 1962/1992. After that, not music has been produced as a such, just concerts based on the same old 20 warhorses.
You should remember you are a guest here. If you don't enjoy the way it's run feel free to start your own site.
You should remember we are guests on earth. Guest but in my country I can express my opinion. If I understand you well, we have to agree with the moderator all the time.
I know it is the BV's website but this section is a forum and a forum is the place where people can't talk with different opinions. If not, it is a dictature. BV gives us his opinion and sometimes I am OK with him and sometimes not. That said, BV done a good work with his website.
Re: Why is it not a news item??????????????Bill gig!
Posted by:
StonedInTokyo
()
Date: October 30, 2016 14:12
Quote
ouroux58Quote
StonedInTokyoQuote
mtaylorQuote
ouroux58Quote
stargroover
Just wondering why the Bill gig is not featured as an official news item?The last item was the Boston gig.
Because BV is only interested by current members of the Rolling Stones. If tomorrow, Charlie will quit the band, he'll forget him too and at that time you could tell what you want on him, he won't care if you're not a band memberb but not now, too early.
If the Stones stops after tomorrow (not all events on the same day), you couldn't tell anymore because he'll close the website. I enjoyed for all these years here but I think my last sentence was a suicide
BV should remember that BW together with CW was the backbone/ spine of Rolling Stones from 1962/1992. After that, not music has been produced as a such, just concerts based on the same old 20 warhorses.
You should remember you are a guest here. If you don't enjoy the way it's run feel free to start your own site.
You should remember we are guests on earth. Guest but in my country I can express my opinion. If I understand you well, we have to agree with the moderator all the time.
I know it is the BV's website but this section is a forum and a forum is the place where people can't talk with different opinions. If not, it is a dictature. BV gives us his opinion and sometimes I am OK with him and sometimes not. That said, BV done a good work with his website.
I just think it's a rude dick move on your part and others to not only criticize bv here but to patronize him with this nonsense that he's not up to speed on Stones history.
YOU should remember we are guests on earth, particularly when posting to an 80th birthday celebration thread.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-10-30 14:14 by StonedInTokyo.
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala @ O2 London
Posted by:
jlowe
()
Date: October 30, 2016 14:59
Quote
StonedInTokyoQuote
Rollin92
I think a lot of people, you could hear folks chatting afterwards, felt that there wasn't a good reason why they didn't show up.
If they had gone those same people would criticize them for trying to steal the spotlight. It's no secret the guys are not particularly close to Bill socially.
Actually Bill and Charlie are both close and not just because they both live in Chelsea (London). Their friendship has survived all the dramas and soap opera lifestyles.
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala @ O2 London
Posted by:
StonedInTokyo
()
Date: October 30, 2016 15:59
Quote
jlowe
Actually Bill and Charlie are both close and not just because they both live in Chelsea (London). Their friendship has survived all the dramas and soap opera lifestyles.
...so they'll probably do something privately. I just think it's unrealistic to expect everyone in the band to drop everything to be there for Bill's birthday concert.
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala in London
Posted by:
bye bye johnny
()
Date: October 30, 2016 16:28
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala in London
Posted by:
bv
()
Date: October 30, 2016 16:53
Talk Is Cheap
Bjornulf
Bjornulf
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala in London
Posted by:
Stonesfan62
()
Date: October 30, 2016 18:41
Thanks for all your work on this website BV it's much appreciated Just ignore any negative comments these people have nothing better to do in their lives!
John Nicholls
Just ignore any negative comments these people have nothing better to do in their lives!John Nicholls
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala in London
Posted by:
Sici
()
Date: October 30, 2016 20:33
All fantastic, thank you bill!
Video message from the Stones:
[www.youtube.com]
And tribute from venue:
[www.youtube.com]
Sici
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-10-31 11:18 by Sici.
Video message from the Stones:
[www.youtube.com]
And tribute from venue:
[www.youtube.com]
Sici
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-10-31 11:18 by Sici.
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala in London
Posted by:
ouroux58
()
Date: October 30, 2016 22:04
Quote
Stonesfan62
Thanks for all your work on this website BV it's much appreciated
John Nicholls
All wrong, this the reason why I have many good things to do that I stopped to see them live since 2007. It was loosing my time and money seeing the circus.
The fact to tell "just ignore any negative comments" means that all must be positive comments.
But perhaps you are like that in your live, always ok with the boss.
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala in London
Posted by:
HankM
()
Date: October 30, 2016 22:09
Reading some of these cringe comments reminds me of getting of work late and dropping by that local bar for a quick drink before closing time and hearing the drunk conversations as people spout their stupid drunken drivel... "You should remember we are guests on earth" ... "1992. After that, not music has been produced" ... talk is never as cheap as that ... and it is why I stopped dropping by that bar too late.
I am very grateful that Bjornulf has spent his time over the years to provide this service (a very clean, easy to use, fast running, ad-free place) to learn about The Rolling Stones.
I am glad he simply brushes off the seemingly drunk BS talk as the cheap talk it is... versus easily hitting the close/delete/doneNdusted/web site gone/END OF LINE button and never be insulted in his own house again.
I am very grateful that Bjornulf has spent his time over the years to provide this service (a very clean, easy to use, fast running, ad-free place) to learn about The Rolling Stones.
I am glad he simply brushes off the seemingly drunk BS talk as the cheap talk it is... versus easily hitting the close/delete/doneNdusted/web site gone/END OF LINE button and never be insulted in his own house again.
Re: Why is it not a news item??????????????Bill gig!
Posted by:
Stonesfan62
()
Date: October 30, 2016 22:53
Quote
ouroux58Quote
stargroover
Just wondering why the Bill gig is not featured as an official news item?The last item was the Boston gig.
Because BV is only interested by current members of the Rolling Stones. If tomorrow, Charlie will quit the band, he'll forget him too and at that time you could tell what you want on him, he won't care if you're not a band memberb but not now, too early.
If the Stones stops after tomorrow (not all events on the same day), you couldn't tell anymore because he'll close the website. I enjoyed for all these years here but I think my last sentence was a suicide
To say BV is only interested in current members is ridiculous! Why are you having a dig at BV? You're obviously trying to get a reaction which you have achieved. Well done
Re: Why is it not a news item??????????????Bill gig!
Posted by:
ouroux58
()
Date: October 30, 2016 23:59
Quote
Stonesfan62Quote
ouroux58Quote
stargroover
Just wondering why the Bill gig is not featured as an official news item?The last item was the Boston gig.
Because BV is only interested by current members of the Rolling Stones. If tomorrow, Charlie will quit the band, he'll forget him too and at that time you could tell what you want on him, he won't care if you're not a band memberb but not now, too early.
If the Stones stops after tomorrow (not all events on the same day), you couldn't tell anymore because he'll close the website. I enjoyed for all these years here but I think my last sentence was a suicide
To say BV is only interested in current members is ridiculous! Why are you having a dig at BV? You're obviously trying to get a reaction which you have achieved. Well done
Je n'essaye rien du tout, c'est juste que si on a quelque de chose de negatif à emettre sur les stones, alors on ne doit pas le dire. Si ta sœur a acheté un tableau que tu trouves moche, tu vas dire qu'il est magnifique parce que tu te trouves chez elle. Ben mon vieux, t'es pas sorti.
Y a des types sur ce site qui vont te dire que le plus mauvais album Stones est meilleur que les perles enregistrées par n'importe qui d'autre. Démerdes toi avec un traducteur.
Re: Why is it not a news item??????????????Bill gig!
Posted by:
Aquamarine
()
Date: October 31, 2016 00:05
Quote
ouroux58Quote
Stonesfan62Quote
ouroux58Quote
stargroover
Just wondering why the Bill gig is not featured as an official news item?The last item was the Boston gig.
Because BV is only interested by current members of the Rolling Stones. If tomorrow, Charlie will quit the band, he'll forget him too and at that time you could tell what you want on him, he won't care if you're not a band memberb but not now, too early.
If the Stones stops after tomorrow (not all events on the same day), you couldn't tell anymore because he'll close the website. I enjoyed for all these years here but I think my last sentence was a suicide
To say BV is only interested in current members is ridiculous! Why are you having a dig at BV? You're obviously trying to get a reaction which you have achieved. Well done
Je n'essaye rien du tout, c'est juste que si on a quelque de chose de negatif à emettre sur les stones, alors on ne doit pas le dire. Si ta sœur a acheté un tableau que tu trouves moche, tu vas dire qu'il est magnifique parce que tu te trouves chez elle. Ben mon vieux, t'es pas sorti.
Y a des types sur ce site qui vont te dire que le plus mauvais album Stones est meilleur que les perles enregistrées par n'importe qui d'autre. Démerdes toi avec un traducteur.
I don't need a traducteur, but I would say that about my sister's tableau, yes, because it's just being thoughtful. That's the only point here--being thoughtful and not insulting your host. Apart from that it seems to me you can say what you like. However moche it might be.
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala in London
Posted by:
shadooby
()
Date: October 31, 2016 00:10
Happy Birthday Bill...80 and holding
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala in London
Posted by:
Rollin92
()
Date: October 31, 2016 00:13
Some great bass tones from Bill!
Little Red Rooster (From 4:10 in)
[www.youtube.com]
Si Si Je Suis Un Rockstar (Bill's wife Suzanne comes on stage to dance, obviously enjoying herself)
[www.youtube.com]
6346789 (Mick Hucknall)
[www.youtube.com]
Little Red Rooster (From 4:10 in)
[www.youtube.com]
Si Si Je Suis Un Rockstar (Bill's wife Suzanne comes on stage to dance, obviously enjoying herself)
[www.youtube.com]
6346789 (Mick Hucknall)
[www.youtube.com]
Re: Why is it not a news item??????????????Bill gig!
Posted by:
ouroux58
()
Date: October 31, 2016 00:25
Quote
AquamarineQuote
ouroux58Quote
Stonesfan62Quote
ouroux58Quote
stargroover
Just wondering why the Bill gig is not featured as an official news item?The last item was the Boston gig.
Because BV is only interested by current members of the Rolling Stones. If tomorrow, Charlie will quit the band, he'll forget him too and at that time you could tell what you want on him, he won't care if you're not a band memberb but not now, too early.
If the Stones stops after tomorrow (not all events on the same day), you couldn't tell anymore because he'll close the website. I enjoyed for all these years here but I think my last sentence was a suicide
To say BV is only interested in current members is ridiculous! Why are you having a dig at BV? You're obviously trying to get a reaction which you have achieved. Well done
Je n'essaye rien du tout, c'est juste que si on a quelque de chose de negatif à emettre sur les stones, alors on ne doit pas le dire. Si ta sœur a acheté un tableau que tu trouves moche, tu vas dire qu'il est magnifique parce que tu te trouves chez elle. Ben mon vieux, t'es pas sorti.
Y a des types sur ce site qui vont te dire que le plus mauvais album Stones est meilleur que les perles enregistrées par n'importe qui d'autre. Démerdes toi avec un traducteur.
I don't need a traducteur, but I would say that about my sister's tableau, yes, because it's just being thoughtful. That's the only point here--being thoughtful and not insulting your host. Apart from that it seems to me you can say what you like. However moche it might be.
Thanks for these very instructive échanges. Good night, sleep tight comme disait l'autre!
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala @ O2 London
Posted by:
frenki09
()
Date: October 31, 2016 05:29
Quote
Rollin92
Set list;
Ruby Tuesday (Joe Brown)
Tulsa Time (J
Summertime Blues (J
Donnegan's Gone (JB & Mark Knopfler)
Song for Sonny Liston (Mark Knopfler)
Playtime Deluxe (MK)
Mule skinner Blues (MK & Van Morrison)
I Believe to My Soul (VM)
Mean Old World (VM)
Harlem Shuffle (Andy Fair Weather Low)
I shall Not Be Moved (AFWL)
You Never Can Tell (Bill)
*Interval*
Martin Taylor x2 Jazz Guitar Pieces
Beast of Burden (Hollie Stephenson)
Time Is On My Side (HS)
Little Red Rooster (Bob G & Steven Van Zandt)
Route 66 (BG & SVZ)
Je Suis Un Rockstar (Bill)
King Bee (Mick Hucknall)
Reconsider Baby (MH)
6345789 (MH)
Mans World (Bev Skeete)
Tell You A Secret (Mike Sanchez)
Let The Good Times Roll (MS & Imelda May)
I'm Crying (IM)
I Feel So Bad (Robert Plant)
Let That Boogie Woogie Roll (RP)
I Need Your Lovin' Every Day (RP &IM)
Encore; I Need Your Lovin' Eveyday (Everyone)
Lovely! Thanks a lot!
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala in London
Posted by:
frenki09
()
Date: October 31, 2016 05:34
Quote
Stonesfan62
Thanks for all your work on this website BV it's much appreciated
John Nicholls
Can we talk more about Bill in this thread?! Please! You can start a new thread if it's not about Bill, Stonesfan62. Please!
Also, let's not discuss the role of Mick Taylor here.
It really sounds like Bill's birthday party was a really-really special event. Let's not spoil the mood by posting about something that doesn't belong here. Please!
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala in London
Posted by:
CaptainCorella
()
Date: October 31, 2016 05:41
Quote
Rollin92
Some great bass tones from Bill!
Si Si Je Suis Un Rockstar (Bill's wife Suzanne comes on stage to dance, obviously enjoying herself)
[www.youtube.com]
You're not human if you don't enjoy that a lot! (And that's allowing for the slightly off key singing!)
--
Captain Corella
60 Years a Fan
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala in London
Posted by:
hopkins
()
Date: October 31, 2016 05:46
No wonder he's happy at home. She had so much joy in her movements and was really going for it. Awww she loves him.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-10-31 05:49 by hopkins.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-10-31 05:49 by hopkins.
Re: Why is it not a news item??????????????Bill gig!
Posted by:
StonedInTokyo
()
Date: October 31, 2016 10:43
Quote
ouroux58
Je n'essaye rien du tout, c'est juste que si on a quelque de chose de negatif à emettre sur les stones, alors on ne doit pas le dire. Si ta sœur a acheté un tableau que tu trouves moche, tu vas dire qu'il est magnifique parce que tu te trouves chez elle. Ben mon vieux, t'es pas sorti.
Y a des types sur ce site qui vont te dire que le plus mauvais album Stones est meilleur que les perles enregistrées par n'importe qui d'autre. Démerdes toi avec un traducteur.
He just went full HOUSE FLY with that post. Where's the swatter?
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala in London
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: October 31, 2016 10:50
Quote
ouroux58Quote
Stonesfan62
Thanks for all your work on this website BV it's much appreciated
John Nicholls
All wrong, this the reason why I have many good things to do that I stopped to see them live since 2007. It was loosing my time and money seeing the circus.
The fact to tell "just ignore any negative comments" means that all must be positive comments.
But perhaps you are like that in your live, always ok with the boss.
You should be able to handle people being critical of your comments as well, no?
Like you said yourself, it's a forum where people speak their mind..
The fact that people disagree with you has nothing to do with dictatorship - they just disagree...
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-10-31 10:50 by DandelionPowderman.
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala in London
Posted by:
paulywaul
()
Date: October 31, 2016 11:08
I KNOW there's no shortage of CCR fans on this board, check this out !!
[www.youtube.com]
WOW !!
[ I want to shout, but I can hardly speak ]
[www.youtube.com]
WOW !!
[ I want to shout, but I can hardly speak ]
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala in London
Posted by:
ouroux58
()
Date: October 31, 2016 11:18
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
ouroux58Quote
Stonesfan62
Thanks for all your work on this website BV it's much appreciated
John Nicholls
All wrong, this the reason why I have many good things to do that I stopped to see them live since 2007. It was loosing my time and money seeing the circus.
The fact to tell "just ignore any negative comments" means that all must be positive comments.
But perhaps you are like that in your live, always ok with the boss.
You should be able to handle people being critical of your comments as well, no?
Like you said yourself, it's a forum where people speak their mind..
The fact that people disagree with you has nothing to do with dictatorship - they just disagree...
Well, at start, I just said that we can't give negative opinions about Rolling Stones, that's all, I don't disagree people, I give only my opinion and after that, some people cry about those who are complaining.,If you are not OK with me, it was not the target, no problemo. When I read that some guys are always saying that on the last shows, they were better than ever, ouaf Happily they didn't seen them in 1973, they should had a heart attack. But I am certainly wrong, before 1990, the Stones weren't here.
Re: Bill Wyman 80th Birthday Gala in London
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: October 31, 2016 11:22
Quote
ouroux58Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
ouroux58Quote
Stonesfan62
Thanks for all your work on this website BV it's much appreciated
John Nicholls
All wrong, this the reason why I have many good things to do that I stopped to see them live since 2007. It was loosing my time and money seeing the circus.
The fact to tell "just ignore any negative comments" means that all must be positive comments.
But perhaps you are like that in your live, always ok with the boss.
You should be able to handle people being critical of your comments as well, no?
Like you said yourself, it's a forum where people speak their mind..
The fact that people disagree with you has nothing to do with dictatorship - they just disagree...
Well, at start, I just said that we can't give negative opinions about Rolling Stones, that's all, I don't disagree people, I give only my opinion and after that, some people cry about those who are complaining.,If you are not OK with me, it was not the target, no problemo. When I read that some guys are always saying that on the last shows, they were better than ever, ouaf Happily they didn't seen them in 1973, they should had a heart attack. But I am certainly wrong, before 1990, the Stones weren't here.
Respect their opinions, and I'm sure they'll respect yours. There are people who like the latter-day Stones the most, just like many think they sucked after 1972.
Heck, many think they haven't really been good since Brian was there
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
a bigger nut , ahgriorr , Aquamarine , BolinFan , dkwalika , FeelslikeaGhost , gotdablouse , guyrachel , manu3121 , Meteor , rbarnes00 , rogerriffin , Slop , Sockers56 , TumblinDice76 , vertigojoe , voodoodrew
Guests:
1935
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10