For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
mosthigh
Glastonbury 2013 is epic (and pro shot!)
[www.youtube.com]
CYHMK starts around the 40 min mark.
Quote
whitem8
No live version I have seen yet beats the studio. But, some of the versions they did with Taylor and Ronnie were darn good. But man, that studio version is vicious and beautiful. some of Mick T's and Richards most nuanced and innovative guitar playing.
Quote
flilflam
[www.youtube.com]
I like the Keith intro to this song,as opposed to the intro on the studio version. It is more jazz like, and Ronnie's guitar work is excellent. Charlie really knows when to pick up the tempo when the song begins to lag a little. I consider it to be a jazz version of a song that was originally intended to be pure rock.
Quote
35loveQuote
muenkeQuote
Winning Ugly VXII
The original studio album version is the best in this case ..... followed by most of the 2013 live versions with Taylor.
Glastonbury 2013 "Can't You Hear Me Knocking" is a great combination of sound quality and performance quality.
After that,there is the '80's live version with Taylor and Richards as well as Buffalo 2014 and the version from the Chicago United Center in September of 2002.
Glastonbury:
[docs.google.com]
Glastonbury is great .... Stones romantic...
*Holy Toledo I've never seen Glastonbury until now!
Mick Talor and Bobby Keys took it over and showed us where it came from/ it's in their blood/ DNA, CYHMK.
MT is one of those virtuoso gifted people that you never see it coming from-
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
35loveQuote
muenkeQuote
Winning Ugly VXII
The original studio album version is the best in this case ..... followed by most of the 2013 live versions with Taylor.
Glastonbury 2013 "Can't You Hear Me Knocking" is a great combination of sound quality and performance quality.
After that,there is the '80's live version with Taylor and Richards as well as Buffalo 2014 and the version from the Chicago United Center in September of 2002.
Glastonbury:
[docs.google.com]
Glastonbury is great .... Stones romantic...
*Holy Toledo I've never seen Glastonbury until now!
Mick Talor and Bobby Keys took it over and showed us where it came from/ it's in their blood/ DNA, CYHMK.
MT is one of those virtuoso gifted people that you never see it coming from-
The mix is a bit weird - that guitar is too loud while Bobby's playing.
Quote
HMS
Glastonbury was good, but nothing exceptional, towards the end it even gets a bit boring.
The MSG-version you can find on Four Flicks is four times better, imo.
The original studio version starts great but then it turns into a Santana-clone and I´m losing interest very fast. The shorter version on SF-Deluxe is much better.
Quote
laertisflash
HMS wrote: "The original studio version starts great but then it turns into a Santana-clone and I´m losing interest very fast..."
That's exactly what I feel listening to the original studio version!! Glad to see that I'm not the only one...
PS: GasLightStreet, with respect, it's not about "wrong" or "right" opinions here. It's about music, which means about matter of taste, partly. Who says that we have to love the same "parts" of the Stones music and Stones legacy?
Quote
TravelinMan
My favorite is Newcastle 1971. Wow. Talk about raw energy, rockin’ til the wheels fall off!