Tell Me :
Talk
I might actually say yes to that at this point.
Not my first choice but,I would take almost anything else.
Nooooooo. SOL? No way. Wow about they play Miss You for as long as it really is and not 34 minutes?
Well, they probably play the unedited 12-min- version.
Bring the YOUNG lisa fisher back and I will watch indeed 34 minutes of miss you. Included the "hired gun bass solo", that bill never got...
You are a walking enzyclopedia
If audiences survived the 99-tour withour Miss You, why shouldn´t they survive 2019 without Miss You? So please stop playing this song, enough is enough is enough.
why can't they do miss you for about 6 minutes but include about 2 minutes of other tunes? do a medley of miss you-hot stuff-dance pt 1-miss you
they are all funky slower tunes. don't think it would be that hard to do a minute tease of those rarely played funk tunes.
With 19-20 songs being the norm during the last couple of tours and they continually stuffing the setlist with the majority of disc 1 & 2 from Hot Rocks (Satisfaction, Jack Flash, Gimme Shelter, Sympathy, Can't Always Get, Rambler, Brown Sugar, Honky Tonk) and then Tumbling Dice, Happy from Exile, It's Only Rock and Roll, Miss You from Some Girls, and Start Me Up from Tattoo-that's your set-list. Not too much left over to play with. I think if they were able to pull off a 2 1/2 hour set-you would see so much more variety.
but dropping those 2 long songs you can get one extra song still in the same time span
Both of those songs go for over 6 minutes at a minimum - they could easily do 2 or 3 other songs.
At least they're not doing IORR... so far.
My girlfriend is excited to see them, she never has, so she'll get the HOT ROCKS/REWIND playlist live. This is the last time for me seeing them, which I didn't count on to begin with.
Very true (dropping You Can't Always Get, Miss You, AND my personal worst song of the set-list Sympathy for the Devil would certainly make for a more diverse and interesting set-list, but the Stones are conservative and like to play it safe unlike Mr. Springsteen who takes risks with his set-list.
I still don't get though what would be wrong with the band putting a minute tease or so of 2 other funk songs in "miss you" and have a medley of the bands better known funky songs encompassed in the bands biggest funky hit
I wonder if my early guess holds up? 3 hours to go...
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
Sighunt
()
Date: June 24, 2019 05:10
Quote
Chris Fountain
Replace Sad Sad with Mercy Mercy.
Replace Miss you with Rocks Off
B Stage Deadflowers PWF , Sweet Virginia,
Now the universe is tilted in the right direction
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
Winning Ugly VXII
()
Date: June 24, 2019 05:27
Keep "Sad Sad Sad" in rotation.
Replace "Miss You" with anything else.
B-Stage : "Play with Fire" , "Let it Bleed" , "Factory Girl" , "Torn and Frayed"
Better tilted universe.
Replace "Miss You" with anything else.
B-Stage : "Play with Fire" , "Let it Bleed" , "Factory Girl" , "Torn and Frayed"
Better tilted universe.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
Rockman
()
Date: June 24, 2019 05:28
Replace "Miss You" with anything else.
Streets Of Love ???????
ROCKMAN
Streets Of Love ???????
ROCKMAN
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
Winning Ugly VXII
()
Date: June 24, 2019 05:35
Quote
Rockman
Replace "Miss You" with anything else.
Streets Of Love ???????
I might actually say yes to that at this point.
Not my first choice but,I would take almost anything else.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
hopkins
()
Date: June 24, 2019 07:01
streets of love? really? can plundered be far behind (the rush to the EXITS)?
The sticky Fingers LP concept (for an entire show) worked out great at the Fonda.
I think maybe it's time for a DW night. Or at least a few of the best tracks.
--
btw, that's a filthy name for a pop album that kids are gonna listen to.
that's not peter butter he's talking about well maybe it is in part. those creative types, you never know.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2019-06-24 07:02 by hopkins.
The sticky Fingers LP concept (for an entire show) worked out great at the Fonda.
I think maybe it's time for a DW night. Or at least a few of the best tracks.
--
btw, that's a filthy name for a pop album that kids are gonna listen to.
that's not peter butter he's talking about well maybe it is in part. those creative types, you never know.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2019-06-24 07:02 by hopkins.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
GasLightStreet
()
Date: June 24, 2019 07:08
Quote
Rockman
Replace "Miss You" with anything else.
Streets Of Love ???????
Nooooooo. SOL? No way. Wow about they play Miss You for as long as it really is and not 34 minutes?
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
deardoctor
()
Date: June 24, 2019 14:52
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
Rockman
Replace "Miss You" with anything else.
Streets Of Love ???????
Nooooooo. SOL? No way. Wow about they play Miss You for as long as it really is and not 34 minutes?
Well, they probably play the unedited 12-min- version.
Bring the YOUNG lisa fisher back and I will watch indeed 34 minutes of miss you. Included the "hired gun bass solo", that bill never got...
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
Winning Ugly VXII
()
Date: June 24, 2019 16:26
The only tolerable modern version of "Miss You" since 1982 were the four 2002 / 2003 versions clocking in at just under 6 minutes. The one in Italy may have been the best of them.
Performed only 4 times on that entire tour out of more than 100 shows ..... after not being performed at all in '99.
Performed only 4 times on that entire tour out of more than 100 shows ..... after not being performed at all in '99.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
HMS
()
Date: June 24, 2019 16:33
Quote
Winning Ugly VXII
The only tolerable modern version of "Miss You" since 1982 were the four 2002 / 2003 versions clocking in at just under 6 minutes. The one in Italy may have been the best of them.
Performed only 4 times on that entire tour out of more than 100 shows ..... after not being performed at all in '99.
You are a walking enzyclopedia
If audiences survived the 99-tour withour Miss You, why shouldn´t they survive 2019 without Miss You? So please stop playing this song, enough is enough is enough.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
Stoneage
()
Date: June 24, 2019 16:49
I think it's because "Miss You" is a crowd pleaser. It's an instant rewarder. And it's also Darryl's shining spot in the set. That's why.
Personally I wouldn't mind being without it (or at least shrunken below 6 minutes). But that's just my own selfish view...
Personally I wouldn't mind being without it (or at least shrunken below 6 minutes). But that's just my own selfish view...
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
keefriffhard4life
()
Date: June 24, 2019 17:09
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
Rockman
Replace "Miss You" with anything else.
Streets Of Love ???????
Nooooooo. SOL? No way. Wow about they play Miss You for as long as it really is and not 34 minutes?
why can't they do miss you for about 6 minutes but include about 2 minutes of other tunes? do a medley of miss you-hot stuff-dance pt 1-miss you
they are all funky slower tunes. don't think it would be that hard to do a minute tease of those rarely played funk tunes.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
Stoneage
()
Date: June 24, 2019 17:22
I have also called for medleys here. They did them in 1975/76. But Stones fans hates medleys for some reason. Sir Michael did one in Chicago though!
You Gotta Move and Rambler. Perhaps he wasn't informed about the tabu?
You Gotta Move and Rambler. Perhaps he wasn't informed about the tabu?
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
filstan
()
Date: June 24, 2019 18:19
Why not lose YCAGWYW and Miss You that are extended songs and add 3-4 songs from B and L, or something they recorded at Chess from 12/5 thats Chicago blues or Chuck Berry? The setlist from Friday night was tight and conservative and was fine for an opening gig to get the engine up and running. Another war horse loaded setlist tomorrow will not sit well with me having attended the opener and back again for #2.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
Sighunt
()
Date: June 24, 2019 18:42
Quote
filstan
Why not lose YCAGWYW and Miss You that are extended songs and add 3-4 songs from B and L, or something they recorded at Chess from 12/5 thats Chicago blues or Chuck Berry? The setlist from Friday night was tight and conservative and was fine for an opening gig to get the engine up and running. Another war horse loaded setlist tomorrow will not sit well with me having attended the opener and back again for #2.
With 19-20 songs being the norm during the last couple of tours and they continually stuffing the setlist with the majority of disc 1 & 2 from Hot Rocks (Satisfaction, Jack Flash, Gimme Shelter, Sympathy, Can't Always Get, Rambler, Brown Sugar, Honky Tonk) and then Tumbling Dice, Happy from Exile, It's Only Rock and Roll, Miss You from Some Girls, and Start Me Up from Tattoo-that's your set-list. Not too much left over to play with. I think if they were able to pull off a 2 1/2 hour set-you would see so much more variety.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
keefriffhard4life
()
Date: June 24, 2019 18:58
Quote
SighuntQuote
filstan
Why not lose YCAGWYW and Miss You that are extended songs and add 3-4 songs from B and L, or something they recorded at Chess from 12/5 thats Chicago blues or Chuck Berry? The setlist from Friday night was tight and conservative and was fine for an opening gig to get the engine up and running. Another war horse loaded setlist tomorrow will not sit well with me having attended the opener and back again for #2.
With 19-20 songs being the norm during the last couple of tours and they continually stuffing the setlist with the majority of disc 1 & 2 from Hot Rocks (Satisfaction, Jack Flash, Gimme Shelter, Sympathy, Can't Always Get, Rambler, Brown Sugar, Honky Tonk) and then Tumbling Dice, Happy from Exile, It's Only Rock and Roll, Miss You from Some Girls, and Start Me Up from Tattoo-that's your set-list. Not too much left over to play with. I think if they were able to pull off a 2 1/2 hour set-you would see so much more variety.
but dropping those 2 long songs you can get one extra song still in the same time span
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
GasLightStreet
()
Date: June 24, 2019 19:03
Quote
keefriffhard4lifeQuote
SighuntQuote
filstan
Why not lose YCAGWYW and Miss You that are extended songs and add 3-4 songs from B and L, or something they recorded at Chess from 12/5 thats Chicago blues or Chuck Berry? The setlist from Friday night was tight and conservative and was fine for an opening gig to get the engine up and running. Another war horse loaded setlist tomorrow will not sit well with me having attended the opener and back again for #2.
With 19-20 songs being the norm during the last couple of tours and they continually stuffing the setlist with the majority of disc 1 & 2 from Hot Rocks (Satisfaction, Jack Flash, Gimme Shelter, Sympathy, Can't Always Get, Rambler, Brown Sugar, Honky Tonk) and then Tumbling Dice, Happy from Exile, It's Only Rock and Roll, Miss You from Some Girls, and Start Me Up from Tattoo-that's your set-list. Not too much left over to play with. I think if they were able to pull off a 2 1/2 hour set-you would see so much more variety.
but dropping those 2 long songs you can get one extra song still in the same time span
Both of those songs go for over 6 minutes at a minimum - they could easily do 2 or 3 other songs.
At least they're not doing IORR... so far.
My girlfriend is excited to see them, she never has, so she'll get the HOT ROCKS/REWIND playlist live. This is the last time for me seeing them, which I didn't count on to begin with.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
Sighunt
()
Date: June 24, 2019 19:07
Quote
keefriffhard4lifeQuote
SighuntQuote
filstan
Why not lose YCAGWYW and Miss You that are extended songs and add 3-4 songs from B and L, or something they recorded at Chess from 12/5 thats Chicago blues or Chuck Berry? The setlist from Friday night was tight and conservative and was fine for an opening gig to get the engine up and running. Another war horse loaded setlist tomorrow will not sit well with me having attended the opener and back again for #2.
With 19-20 songs being the norm during the last couple of tours and they continually stuffing the setlist with the majority of disc 1 & 2 from Hot Rocks (Satisfaction, Jack Flash, Gimme Shelter, Sympathy, Can't Always Get, Rambler, Brown Sugar, Honky Tonk) and then Tumbling Dice, Happy from Exile, It's Only Rock and Roll, Miss You from Some Girls, and Start Me Up from Tattoo-that's your set-list. Not too much left over to play with. I think if they were able to pull off a 2 1/2 hour set-you would see so much more variety.
but dropping those 2 long songs you can get one extra song still in the same time span
Very true (dropping You Can't Always Get, Miss You, AND my personal worst song of the set-list Sympathy for the Devil would certainly make for a more diverse and interesting set-list, but the Stones are conservative and like to play it safe unlike Mr. Springsteen who takes risks with his set-list.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
dennycranium
()
Date: June 24, 2019 19:13
I haven't seen them since 2005.
I'm looking forward to a war horses set list. I do hope the tempo is right, however.
I happen to like Miss You, especially Darryl's bass solo in the middle. It's most likely in the set for Mick and Darryl. Mick is proud of that song and Darryl gets to shine a bit. I'd be ok with Midnight Rambler out or a shortened version of it.
Look, all this set list discussion is really just laps around the pool. It doesn't get us anywhere.
The Stones are playing to the 54,000 casual concert goers who CAME to hear songs they know.
The 6000 of us fanatics? (Assuming 10% of us are fanatics and I think that's generous) they will try to throw us a bone every now and then.
If we want a set of deep cuts? The 6000 of us would have to pay 6 figures for a show.
I'm looking forward to a war horses set list. I do hope the tempo is right, however.
I happen to like Miss You, especially Darryl's bass solo in the middle. It's most likely in the set for Mick and Darryl. Mick is proud of that song and Darryl gets to shine a bit. I'd be ok with Midnight Rambler out or a shortened version of it.
Look, all this set list discussion is really just laps around the pool. It doesn't get us anywhere.
The Stones are playing to the 54,000 casual concert goers who CAME to hear songs they know.
The 6000 of us fanatics? (Assuming 10% of us are fanatics and I think that's generous) they will try to throw us a bone every now and then.
If we want a set of deep cuts? The 6000 of us would have to pay 6 figures for a show.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
keefriffhard4life
()
Date: June 24, 2019 20:37
Quote
dennycranium
I haven't seen them since 2005.
I'm looking forward to a war horses set list. I do hope the tempo is right, however.
I happen to like Miss You, especially Darryl's bass solo in the middle. It's most likely in the set for Mick and Darryl. Mick is proud of that song and Darryl gets to shine a bit. I'd be ok with Midnight Rambler out or a shortened version of it.
Look, all this set list discussion is really just laps around the pool. It doesn't get us anywhere.
The Stones are playing to the 54,000 casual concert goers who CAME to hear songs they know.
The 6000 of us fanatics? (Assuming 10% of us are fanatics and I think that's generous) they will try to throw us a bone every now and then.
If we want a set of deep cuts? The 6000 of us would have to pay 6 figures for a show.
I still don't get though what would be wrong with the band putting a minute tease or so of 2 other funk songs in "miss you" and have a medley of the bands better known funky songs encompassed in the bands biggest funky hit
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
MacLaurens
()
Date: June 24, 2019 20:52
Miss You is an important song setlist wise. It lets Darryl to play a solo, just as Honky Tonk Women lets Chuck to shine. It also lets Keith to rest after his set, as his guitar part is not that intense compared to the songs that follow Miss You. Even though am not a big fan of the song, it truly has a purpose in the setlist.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2019-06-24 20:54 by MacLaurens.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2019-06-24 20:54 by MacLaurens.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
TeaAtThree
()
Date: June 25, 2019 03:32
I was like the rest of you and thought, "I really don't want to hear Miss You at Chicago #1," and then they played it, and it COOKED. Daryll has some of the best chops on the stage these days, and his solo was long and awesome.
In fact, the two tunes I thought I could most do without were MY and HTW, and when both got cooking it got the crowd going, and it even got cynical me going.
Sympathy is truly the song that needs to go. Keith's solo in that is simply awful.
Sad Sad Sad was great too. They tend to focus a little harder when playing songs they don't often play, and Keith ripped that solo.
And it was gorgeously awesome to have an acoustic B stage set. Angie and Dead Flowers were wonderfully rendered.
Lastly, though I really wanted Out of Control (love Ronnie's soloing) they did a nice job on "web vote" YGMR.
T@3
In fact, the two tunes I thought I could most do without were MY and HTW, and when both got cooking it got the crowd going, and it even got cynical me going.
Sympathy is truly the song that needs to go. Keith's solo in that is simply awful.
Sad Sad Sad was great too. They tend to focus a little harder when playing songs they don't often play, and Keith ripped that solo.
And it was gorgeously awesome to have an acoustic B stage set. Angie and Dead Flowers were wonderfully rendered.
Lastly, though I really wanted Out of Control (love Ronnie's soloing) they did a nice job on "web vote" YGMR.
T@3
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
Stoneage
()
Date: June 26, 2019 01:11
Quote
Stoneage
A piece of cake to pick out Tuesday's setlist then. (If it's not raining). Here is my prediction:
01. Street Fighting Man
02. Let's Spend The Night Together
03. Tumbling Dice
04. Sad Sad Sad
05. Vote song (Harlem Shuffle or Heartbreaker)
06. You can't Always..
07. Play With Fire
08. Sweet Virginia
09. Sympathy For...
10. Honky Tonk
11. Slipping Away
12. Before They Make Me Run
13. Miss You
14. PIB
15. Rambler
16. SMU
17. JJ Flash
18. Brown Sugar
19. Shelter
20 Satisfaction
Jokers will be Harlem Shuffle and Mercy, Mercy. Will they find their way into the set?
I wonder if my early guess holds up? 3 hours to go...
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
TumblinDice76
()
Date: June 26, 2019 01:27
I think Monkey Man has a shot and wouldn't be surprise if SSS is out tonight but back in at Canada show. IORR could replace LSTNT for tonight only as well since Chicago gets 2 shows. Something I noticed while listening to Friday's bootleg today. If they had done OOC it would have been-OOC-YCAGWYW-Angie. Kind of would have bogged things down too much. With the way the setlist is with song vote-YCAGWYW-B Stage Unplugged, slower songs don't really work as vote songs.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
Stoneage
()
Date: June 26, 2019 01:32
Interesting, TD76. I think you may be right. Maybe they will replace both LSTNT and SSS. Or at least one of them.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
TumblinDice76
()
Date: June 26, 2019 01:40
I'll be keeping a close eye on Setlist FM tonight. Hopefully download the Bootleg at lunch tomorrow.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
Midnight Toker
()
Date: June 26, 2019 01:53
Replace Sad Sad Sad with any Jagger/Richards original and replace Satisfaction
with The Last Time.
with The Last Time.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
TumblinDice76
()
Date: June 26, 2019 01:53
Stoneage-after reading soundcheck songs...... SPOILER below.
Bitch in the 2 spot, Monkey as song vote. Angie probably remains, Sweet Virginia unstead of DF. Ride Em On Down either is a rain song replacement for SV or replaces SSS.
Bitch in the 2 spot, Monkey as song vote. Angie probably remains, Sweet Virginia unstead of DF. Ride Em On Down either is a rain song replacement for SV or replaces SSS.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
TumblinDice76
()
Date: June 26, 2019 01:55
Toker-The Last Time was great live in '97. No idea why they don't play that live more. Same with 19th Nervous Breakdown.
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
Stoneage
()
Date: June 26, 2019 01:59
Read that too, TD76. Well, every change is a good change here. Let's hope for Bitch and Monkey Man!
Re: The Rolling Stones set list discussions
Posted by:
jumpontopofmebaby
()
Date: June 26, 2019 02:41
I hate Miss You live. Period. Hate it. It’s tired and I think 85% of the crowd is done with it. I say 2 for 1. Shit can miss you. Play Ruby Tuesday and She’s a Rainbow instead. How ever I will say. Miss you comes on the radio. I turn it up.
Do we need a retire Miss You thread?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2019-06-26 02:51 by jumpontopofmebaby.
Do we need a retire Miss You thread?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2019-06-26 02:51 by jumpontopofmebaby.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
Christiaan , cwalters , deardoctor , exilestones , gavin95 , Handova , jp.M , jumpingjackflash5 , loog droog , MJAGGER123 , More Hot Rocks , Peterh , roobar58 , Stonesfan2146 , swimtothemoon , Topi , TW2019 , vibrolux
Guests:
1314
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10