Quote
DancelittleSister

Quote
Mathijs
Why would the Stones invite him? It's an affair of the current band, not of the band from 43 years ago.

And it seems that his involvement with the band in 2013 and 2014 has gone quite sour...

Mathijs

I understood that the Stones did invite him?

He was invited by people «without the proper authority», apparently (AKA not by the Stones themselves)..

So now he's been offered an invite after "his office" sent an email to the gallery but Taylor can't make it in time. Why make the effort to reach out and complain if you don't intend to make use of the invitation? Instead we are led to believe Taylor is typing at home adnauseum, responding to almost every related comment. Sitting in his bathrobe, cigarretes and ash trays spread about, half full beers and red sippy cups on the scattering the floor. Much like the day he left the Stones and shattered his Gibson 355 to firewood, another brick on the wall! The Stones certainly have handled this poorly but that is no excuse for a public blood bath from Taylor. Wood comes out the worst through all of this, insecure about being blown off the stage by a "ghost" since 1975. That is the inescapable truth despite all attempts to rewrite history. With a friend like Ronnie who needs enemies.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2016-04-04 15:10 by DoomandGloom.

Quote
DoomandGloom
So now he's been offered an invite after "his office" sent an email to the gallery but Taylor can't make it in time. Why make the effort to reach out and complain if you don't intend to make use of the invitation? Instead we are led to believe Taylor is typing at home adnauseum, responding to almost every related comment. The Stones certainly have handled this poorly but that is no excuse for a public blood bath from Taylor. Wood comes out the worst through all of this, insecure about being blown off the stage by a "ghost" since 1975. That is the inescapable truth despite all attempts to rewrite history. With a friend like Ronnie who needs enemies.

How on earth are you coming to that conclusion?

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom
So now he's been offered an invite after "his office" sent an email to the gallery but Taylor can't make it in time. Why make the effort to reach out and complain if you don't intend to make use of the invitation? Instead we are led to believe Taylor is typing at home adnauseum, responding to almost every related comment. The Stones certainly have handled this poorly but that is no excuse for a public blood bath from Taylor. Wood comes out the worst through all of this, insecure about being blown off the stage by a "ghost" since 1975. That is the inescapable truth despite all attempts to rewrite history. With a friend like Ronnie who needs enemies.

How on earth are you coming to that conclusion?

most two faced act of all was inviting Taylor to join up with Wood at the same time it became clear he was not invited for The Sticky Fingers Tour. Very tacky, Wood plays to all sides, his comments about Taylor are shallow and insecure.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-04-04 15:14 by DoomandGloom.

Quote
DoomandGloom
So now he's been offered an invite after "his office" sent an email to the gallery but Taylor can't make it in time. Why make the effort to reach out and complain if you don't intend to make use of the invitation? Instead we are led to believe Taylor is typing at home adnauseum, responding to almost every related comment. Sitting in his bathrobe, cigarretes and ash trays spread about, half full beers and red sippy cups on the scattering the floor. Much like the day he left the Stones and shattered his Gibson 355 to firewood, another brick on the wall! The Stones certainly have handled this poorly but that is no excuse for a public blood bath from Taylor. Wood comes out the worst through all of this, insecure about being blown off the stage by a "ghost" since 1975. That is the inescapable truth despite all attempts to rewrite history. With a friend like Ronnie who needs enemies.

Ronnie's had his ups and downs, no doubt drug and alcohol related. He played great on the 1975 tour if LA Friday is anything to go by. His playing on recent tours has also been excellent. As great as the Taylor years were the band have no need of him to shine.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-04-04 21:56 by rebelrebel.

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom
So now he's been offered an invite after "his office" sent an email to the gallery but Taylor can't make it in time. Why make the effort to reach out and complain if you don't intend to make use of the invitation? Instead we are led to believe Taylor is typing at home adnauseum, responding to almost every related comment. The Stones certainly have handled this poorly but that is no excuse for a public blood bath from Taylor. Wood comes out the worst through all of this, insecure about being blown off the stage by a "ghost" since 1975. That is the inescapable truth despite all attempts to rewrite history. With a friend like Ronnie who needs enemies.

How on earth are you coming to that conclusion?

most two faced act of all was inviting Taylor to join up with Wood at the same time it became clear he was not invited for The Sticky Fingers Tour. Very tacky, Wood plays to all sides, his comments about Taylor are shallow and insecure.

Ronnie didn't have to single-handedly invite Taylor to the Jimmy Reed-gigs and other of his gigs, but he did. He could have had ANY other guitarist there with him, but he chose Taylor.

It seems you have made up your mind about who to blame for this, but think it over and try to explain why Ronnie is insecure when he wanted to work with Taylor for these gigs..

Yes they have an adequate Vegas band with Wood with occasional greatness based on the strength of their unmatched catalog but Wood has often been the weak link, presently he is Keith's caddy, finishing phrases, kissing butt and spreading misinformation while pretending to be Taylor's pal. I never bought that act for a second but desperate Taylor gets played a fool by an experienced manipulator. When I was an insider in the 80's Taylor's Ghost was still around and he came up in conversation as an unresolved issue. The company line was Wood was given the job to inspire Keith to take the lead.

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DancelittleSister

Quote
Mathijs
Why would the Stones invite him? It's an affair of the current band, not of the band from 43 years ago.

And it seems that his involvement with the band in 2013 and 2014 has gone quite sour...

Mathijs

I understood that the Stones did invite him?

He was invited by people «without the proper authority», apparently (AKA not by the Stones themselves)..

So what? An invitation is an invitation.

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom
So now he's been offered an invite after "his office" sent an email to the gallery but Taylor can't make it in time. Why make the effort to reach out and complain if you don't intend to make use of the invitation? Instead we are led to believe Taylor is typing at home adnauseum, responding to almost every related comment. The Stones certainly have handled this poorly but that is no excuse for a public blood bath from Taylor. Wood comes out the worst through all of this, insecure about being blown off the stage by a "ghost" since 1975. That is the inescapable truth despite all attempts to rewrite history. With a friend like Ronnie who needs enemies.

How on earth are you coming to that conclusion?

most two faced act of all was inviting Taylor to join up with Wood at the same time it became clear he was not invited for The Sticky Fingers Tour. Very tacky, Wood plays to all sides, his comments about Taylor are shallow and insecure.

Ronnie didn't have to single-handedly invite Taylor to the Jimmy Reed-gigs and other of his gigs, but he did. He could have had ANY other guitarist there with him, but he chose Taylor.

It seems you have made up your mind about who to blame for this, but think it over and try to explain why Ronnie is insecure when he wanted to work with Taylor for these gigs..

Simple answer, Jagger told Wood to work out stuff with Taylor because they were worried that Keith would faulter and Jagger wanted to tour no.matter what.

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom
So now he's been offered an invite after "his office" sent an email to the gallery but Taylor can't make it in time. Why make the effort to reach out and complain if you don't intend to make use of the invitation? Instead we are led to believe Taylor is typing at home adnauseum, responding to almost every related comment. The Stones certainly have handled this poorly but that is no excuse for a public blood bath from Taylor. Wood comes out the worst through all of this, insecure about being blown off the stage by a "ghost" since 1975. That is the inescapable truth despite all attempts to rewrite history. With a friend like Ronnie who needs enemies.

How on earth are you coming to that conclusion?

most two faced act of all was inviting Taylor to join up with Wood at the same time it became clear he was not invited for The Sticky Fingers Tour. Very tacky, Wood plays to all sides, his comments about Taylor are shallow and insecure.

Ronnie didn't have to single-handedly invite Taylor to the Jimmy Reed-gigs and other of his gigs, but he did. He could have had ANY other guitarist there with him, but he chose Taylor.

It seems you have made up your mind about who to blame for this, but think it over and try to explain why Ronnie is insecure when he wanted to work with Taylor for these gigs..

Simple answer, Jagger told Wood to work out stuff with Taylor because they were worried that Keith would faulter and Jagger wanted to tour no.matter what.

I don't think Jagger had impact on who Woody wanted to play with on his spare time. Not even Mick has that kind of clout..

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom
So now he's been offered an invite after "his office" sent an email to the gallery but Taylor can't make it in time. Why make the effort to reach out and complain if you don't intend to make use of the invitation? Instead we are led to believe Taylor is typing at home adnauseum, responding to almost every related comment. The Stones certainly have handled this poorly but that is no excuse for a public blood bath from Taylor. Wood comes out the worst through all of this, insecure about being blown off the stage by a "ghost" since 1975. That is the inescapable truth despite all attempts to rewrite history. With a friend like Ronnie who needs enemies.

How on earth are you coming to that conclusion?

most two faced act of all was inviting Taylor to join up with Wood at the same time it became clear he was not invited for The Sticky Fingers Tour. Very tacky, Wood plays to all sides, his comments about Taylor are shallow and insecure.

Ronnie didn't have to single-handedly invite Taylor to the Jimmy Reed-gigs and other of his gigs, but he did. He could have had ANY other guitarist there with him, but he chose Taylor.

It seems you have made up your mind about who to blame for this, but think it over and try to explain why Ronnie is insecure when he wanted to work with Taylor for these gigs..

Simple answer, Jagger told Wood to work out stuff with Taylor because they were worried that Keith would faulter and Jagger wanted to tour no.matter what.

I don't think Jagger had impact on who Woody wanted to play with on his spare time. Not even Mick has that kind of clout..

there was such a quote from Wood himself about six months before the anniversary. I can't substantiate but remember him spilling the beans on this strategy.

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom
So now he's been offered an invite after "his office" sent an email to the gallery but Taylor can't make it in time. Why make the effort to reach out and complain if you don't intend to make use of the invitation? Instead we are led to believe Taylor is typing at home adnauseum, responding to almost every related comment. The Stones certainly have handled this poorly but that is no excuse for a public blood bath from Taylor. Wood comes out the worst through all of this, insecure about being blown off the stage by a "ghost" since 1975. That is the inescapable truth despite all attempts to rewrite history. With a friend like Ronnie who needs enemies.

How on earth are you coming to that conclusion?

most two faced act of all was inviting Taylor to join up with Wood at the same time it became clear he was not invited for The Sticky Fingers Tour. Very tacky, Wood plays to all sides, his comments about Taylor are shallow and insecure.

Ronnie didn't have to single-handedly invite Taylor to the Jimmy Reed-gigs and other of his gigs, but he did. He could have had ANY other guitarist there with him, but he chose Taylor.

It seems you have made up your mind about who to blame for this, but think it over and try to explain why Ronnie is insecure when he wanted to work with Taylor for these gigs..

Simple answer, Jagger told Wood to work out stuff with Taylor because they were worried that Keith would faulter and Jagger wanted to tour no.matter what.

I don't think Jagger had impact on who Woody wanted to play with on his spare time. Not even Mick has that kind of clout..

there was such a quote from Wood himself about six months before the anniversary. I can't substantiate but remember him spilling the beans on this strategy.

Ronnie's gigs were after the anniversary gigs. They were even after the US 2013 tour..

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom
So now he's been offered an invite after "his office" sent an email to the gallery but Taylor can't make it in time. Why make the effort to reach out and complain if you don't intend to make use of the invitation? Instead we are led to believe Taylor is typing at home adnauseum, responding to almost every related comment. The Stones certainly have handled this poorly but that is no excuse for a public blood bath from Taylor. Wood comes out the worst through all of this, insecure about being blown off the stage by a "ghost" since 1975. That is the inescapable truth despite all attempts to rewrite history. With a friend like Ronnie who needs enemies.

How on earth are you coming to that conclusion?

most two faced act of all was inviting Taylor to join up with Wood at the same time it became clear he was not invited for The Sticky Fingers Tour. Very tacky, Wood plays to all sides, his comments about Taylor are shallow and insecure.

Ronnie didn't have to single-handedly invite Taylor to the Jimmy Reed-gigs and other of his gigs, but he did. He could have had ANY other guitarist there with him, but he chose Taylor.

It seems you have made up your mind about who to blame for this, but think it over and try to explain why Ronnie is insecure when he wanted to work with Taylor for these gigs..

Simple answer, Jagger told Wood to work out stuff with Taylor because they were worried that Keith would faulter and Jagger wanted to tour no.matter what.

I don't think Jagger had impact on who Woody wanted to play with on his spare time. Not even Mick has that kind of clout..

there was such a quote from Wood himself about six months before the anniversary. I can't substantiate but remember him spilling the beans on this strategy.

Ronnie's gigs were after the anniversary gigs. They were even after the US 2013 tour..

nope there was.some stuff previous

Now the decisions inside the Stones are taken from Wood? Absurd, Wood has the right to vote like everyone and is free to vote as they like.
And 'absurd to stand still here talking about Taylor and the Stones.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-04-04 15:49 by Testify.

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom
So now he's been offered an invite after "his office" sent an email to the gallery but Taylor can't make it in time. Why make the effort to reach out and complain if you don't intend to make use of the invitation? Instead we are led to believe Taylor is typing at home adnauseum, responding to almost every related comment. The Stones certainly have handled this poorly but that is no excuse for a public blood bath from Taylor. Wood comes out the worst through all of this, insecure about being blown off the stage by a "ghost" since 1975. That is the inescapable truth despite all attempts to rewrite history. With a friend like Ronnie who needs enemies.

How on earth are you coming to that conclusion?

most two faced act of all was inviting Taylor to join up with Wood at the same time it became clear he was not invited for The Sticky Fingers Tour. Very tacky, Wood plays to all sides, his comments about Taylor are shallow and insecure.

Ronnie didn't have to single-handedly invite Taylor to the Jimmy Reed-gigs and other of his gigs, but he did. He could have had ANY other guitarist there with him, but he chose Taylor.

It seems you have made up your mind about who to blame for this, but think it over and try to explain why Ronnie is insecure when he wanted to work with Taylor for these gigs..

Simple answer, Jagger told Wood to work out stuff with Taylor because they were worried that Keith would faulter and Jagger wanted to tour no.matter what.

I don't think Jagger had impact on who Woody wanted to play with on his spare time. Not even Mick has that kind of clout..

there was such a quote from Wood himself about six months before the anniversary. I can't substantiate but remember him spilling the beans on this strategy.

Ronnie's gigs were after the anniversary gigs. They were even after the US 2013 tour..

nope there was.some stuff previous

You're mixing up here.

I don't remember any talk about Wood patching things up with Taylor in 2012? If anything Jagger did the patching up when he got Taylor to work on "Plundered my Soul" in 2009 and when the alleged "Keith insurance issue" came up before the 50th concerts he must have reached out to Taylor. Anyway, yes rather OT here ;-)

--------------
IORR Links : Essential Studio Outtakes CDs : Audio - History of Rarest Outtakes : Audio



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-04-04 16:03 by gotdablouse.

He must be thinking about the 100 Club charity gig a couple of years earlier, but I doubt Mick ordered them to perform that gig together.

Just been to the gallery, not a lot of people waiting behind the barriers yet but there isn't a lot of public standing space either. The public are limited to the paved area outside the ticket office and gate to the gallery.

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
DandelionPowderman

Quote
DoomandGloom
So now he's been offered an invite after "his office" sent an email to the gallery but Taylor can't make it in time. Why make the effort to reach out and complain if you don't intend to make use of the invitation? Instead we are led to believe Taylor is typing at home adnauseum, responding to almost every related comment. The Stones certainly have handled this poorly but that is no excuse for a public blood bath from Taylor. Wood comes out the worst through all of this, insecure about being blown off the stage by a "ghost" since 1975. That is the inescapable truth despite all attempts to rewrite history. With a friend like Ronnie who needs enemies.

How on earth are you coming to that conclusion?

most two faced act of all was inviting Taylor to join up with Wood at the same time it became clear he was not invited for The Sticky Fingers Tour. Very tacky, Wood plays to all sides, his comments about Taylor are shallow and insecure.

Ronnie didn't have to single-handedly invite Taylor to the Jimmy Reed-gigs and other of his gigs, but he did. He could have had ANY other guitarist there with him, but he chose Taylor.

It seems you have made up your mind about who to blame for this, but think it over and try to explain why Ronnie is insecure when he wanted to work with Taylor for these gigs..

Thank you, Dandie. Any excuse to bash Ronnie, who also invited MT to play with him on other occasions as well. Off the top of my head, I've seen them at the 100 Club quite some time ago at least once, then at Boogie for Stu and a few months ago at La Scala.

This thread really should be left to the celebration and excitement of Exhibitionism...

The discussion of the disgruntled former member's most recent outburst is here...
[www.iorr.org]

Quote
Beast
Thank you, Dandie. Any excuse to bash Ronnie, who also invited MT to play with him on other occasions as well.
Off the top of my head, I've seen them at the 100 Club quite some time ago at least once, then at Boogie for Stu ...

... where he gave MT his amp when MT was having trouble with his own.
Thank you Dandelion dear, and my dear glam Beast.

I checked in on this thread to see all the happy excitement for the opening tonight,
and instead I'm sorry I looked at it.

Quote
MisterDDDD
This thread really should be left to the celebration and excitement of Exhibitionism...

The discussion of the disgruntled former member's most recent outburst is here...
[www.iorr.org]

I think Bjørnulf moved it in here.

read full article here [www.telegraph.co.uk]

Neil McCormick, music critic

4 APRIL 2016 • 10:26AM

On the eve of a major exhibition that unlocks the Rolling Stones’ private archives, Mick Jagger talks to Neil McCormick about the blues, the band’s unbreakable camaraderie – and that dress

‘It’s fair to say I’m not very nostalgic,” says Mick Jagger. It might seem an odd statement from the 72-year-old rock star as he prepares to launch a major interactive multimedia exhibition of the Rolling Stones’ five-decade career just after the band's landmark gig in Cuba. “Obviously, to be able to help this along, I have had to invest in delving back,” Jagger acknowledges. “But the thing about nostalgia is that it is trying to hark back to something that no longer exists, and I don’t really feel like that about this exhibition. I look at it as part of an ongoing story. We’re still out there, still on the road, still going. This is just the next thing.”

Quote
with sssoul

Quote
Beast
Thank you, Dandie. Any excuse to bash Ronnie, who also invited MT to play with him on other occasions as well.
Off the top of my head, I've seen them at the 100 Club quite some time ago at least once, then at Boogie for Stu ...

... where he gave MT his amp when MT was having trouble with his own.
Thank you Dandelion dear, and my dear glam Beast.

I checked in on this thread to see all the happy excitement for the opening tonight,
and instead I'm sorry I looked at it.

the band created this contraversy by being insensitive



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-04-04 17:05 by DoomandGloom.

That was funny going on Taylor's FB page. The fanboy ass kissing was hilarious.

Quote
Rollin92
Just been to the gallery, not a lot of people waiting behind the barriers yet but there isn't a lot of public standing space either. The public are limited to the paved area outside the ticket office and gate to the gallery.

I will be there about 5pm hope to get a spot.

Nate

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
with sssoul
... where he gave MT his amp when MT was having trouble with his own.
Thank you Dandelion dear, and my dear glam Beast.

I checked in on this thread to see all the happy excitement for the opening tonight,
and instead I'm sorry I looked at it.

the band created this contraversy by being insensitive

I don't see any controversy. I see a tiny number of posters thrashing around making lots of embarrassing noise.
"The band" is the Rolling Stones. Yes, they're insensitive. Unbunch your panties, willya

Hope you all get a good spot outside tonight, and inside if anyone is lucky enough to get in there.

Already in this website about the MT business.

I hope this thing doesn't get any bigger or else the tabloids will have a field day in the papers tomorrow.

Exhibitionism

Heading there shortly. See you guys there!

Quote
with sssoul

Quote
DoomandGloom

Quote
with sssoul
... where he gave MT his amp when MT was having trouble with his own.
Thank you Dandelion dear, and my dear glam Beast.

I checked in on this thread to see all the happy excitement for the opening tonight,
and instead I'm sorry I looked at it.

the band created this contraversy by being insensitive

I don't see any controversy. I see a tiny number of posters thrashing around making lots of embarrassing noise.
"The band" is the Rolling Stones. Yes, they're insensitive. Unbunch your panties, willya

Absolutely correct