ALL EUROPEAN IORRers ARE BLOODY @#$%&!!!!!

I posted I would be scoping Nashville and there were never more than 12 viewers??? You don't know how to set an alarm? YOU ARE ALL WHINEY OLD MEN WHO DON'T KNOW WHAT ROCK N ROLL MEANS!!!! STOP COMING TO THIS FORUM AND COMPLAINING ABOUT SET LISTS & NO MICK TAYLOR!! GO AWAY!!!



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2015-06-20 05:31 by bv.

Cool.

Love the vibe. More!

Quote
DREAMTIME
I posted I would be scoping Nashville and there were never more than 12 viewers??? You don't know how to set an alarm? YOU ARE ALL WHINEY OLD MEN WHO DON'T KNOW WHAT ROCK N ROLL MEANS!!!! STOP COMING TO THIS FORUM AND COMPLAINING ABOUT SET LISTS & NO MICK TAYLOR!! GO AWAY!!!

I love to watch the Stones shows on periscope, but I dont know how to set an periscope alarm. I have never even heard of that.

But a fun bunch of us were here on show night and scrambling to find good periscopes. I might suggest if you do this again and want more people to watch doing what one person who frequents IORR did>>> flacnvinyl posted on the travel thread his twitter account and remided us he was scoping, and then he posted about it again on the live show thread. After reminding his scope was easy to locate by clicking on his twitter account.

Several other periscopes which we did not know about showed up on the search. I wonder why your periscope did not show up on the scoping list we were all looking at on twitter [twitter.com]

Please dont yell at me for posting this, I am only trying to give ideas and help in the future if/when this comes up again for you or anyone else periscoping and want people to watch. Tell us and tell us again and then give us a link and tell us again.

12 viewers total or only 12 from Europe? Perhaps your feed couldn't compete sound wise or video wise with other scopers? I'm going to watch the best feed I can find at any given time, not going to watch yours unless you promise to train it on Theodora occasionally, have a particularly good view of Keith's fretboard or some other compelling reason to watch, like possibly some extremely funny neighbors in the adjacent seats.

I'm sure you would have had way more than 7 viewers during the Bobby Keys tribute but for some reason, only periscope link here (posted by MisterDDDD) died in the middle of Happy and never came back.

peace

I was wondering how long it would be before the voice of sober second thought and reason had you change the thread title.

I watched. It was great. Thank you.

Quote
Turner68
I watched. It was great. Thank you.

As far as a remember, nobody could find a link for Dreamtime' feed. If you had posted it that night, like everybody's been doing, it would be very appreciated by everybody.

Quote
Cristiano Radtke

Quote
Turner68
I watched. It was great. Thank you.

As far as a remember, nobody could find a link for Dreamtime' feed. If you had posted it that night, like everybody's been doing, it would be very appreciated by everybody.

Hey Christiano -

Really appreciate everything you do on this board so I won't be snarky in my reply.

Very early in the show I posted that he/she was broadcasting, had great seats, and great sound, and I posted the name to follow.


Re: Nashville TN USA 17-June-2015 Rolling Stones live show updates
Posted by: Turner68 ()
Date: June 18, 2015 03:40

Dreamtime is working better for me and great seats
Lcdreamtime

Yes, I know you and Dreamtime posted his Twitter account here, but I did try to follow what was going on Dreamtime's twitter account (and I'm sure other users had tried that too) and couldn't find nothing. It would be easier to post the periscope feed.

Quote
Turner68

Quote
Cristiano Radtke

Quote
Turner68
I watched. It was great. Thank you.

As far as a remember, nobody could find a link for Dreamtime' feed. If you had posted it that night, like everybody's been doing, it would be very appreciated by everybody.

Hey Christiano -

Really appreciate everything you do on this board so I won't be snarky in my reply.

Very early in the show I posted that he/she was broadcasting, had great seats, and great sound, and I posted the name to follow.


Re: Nashville TN USA 17-June-2015 Rolling Stones live show updates
Posted by: Turner68 ()
Date: June 18, 2015 03:40

Dreamtime is working better for me and great seats
Lcdreamtime

Would have been nice if you had provided am easy clickable link like others do.
[www.iorr.org]

Quote
Turner68

Quote
Cristiano Radtke

Quote
Turner68
I watched. It was great. Thank you.

As far as a remember, nobody could find a link for Dreamtime' feed. If you had posted it that night, like everybody's been doing, it would be very appreciated by everybody.

Hey Christiano -

Really appreciate everything you do on this board so I won't be snarky in my reply.

Very early in the show I posted that he/she was broadcasting, had great seats, and great sound, and I posted the name to follow.


Re: Nashville TN USA 17-June-2015 Rolling Stones live show updates
Posted by: Turner68 ()
Date: June 18, 2015 03:40

Dreamtime is working better for me and great seats
Lcdreamtime

I saw that post and followed on Twitter... I din't receive any notice that it went live and it did not show up in the searches I did because I looked for it several times.
Some kind of glitch with the new technology I reckon
But thanks very much for scoping and for trying to make sure we were aware!

Quote
MisterDDDD

Quote
Turner68

Quote
Cristiano Radtke

Quote
Turner68
I watched. It was great. Thank you.

As far as a remember, nobody could find a link for Dreamtime' feed. If you had posted it that night, like everybody's been doing, it would be very appreciated by everybody.

Hey Christiano -

Really appreciate everything you do on this board so I won't be snarky in my reply.

Very early in the show I posted that he/she was broadcasting, had great seats, and great sound, and I posted the name to follow.


Re: Nashville TN USA 17-June-2015 Rolling Stones live show updates
Posted by: Turner68 ()
Date: June 18, 2015 03:40

Dreamtime is working better for me and great seats
Lcdreamtime

I saw that post and followed on Twitter... I din't receive any notice that it went live and it did not show up in the searches I did because I looked for it several times.
Some kind of glitch with the new technology I reckon
But thanks very much for scoping and for trying to make sure we were aware!

Periscope is really cool. I see artist broadcasting while they paint paintings, investors taking questions on business advice, people flying their drones, etc.

It depends on a good cell signal of course. When you are in an arena full of 50,000 people using their cell phones, all competing for bandwidth, the cell networks just get overloaded (nothing to do with periscope.)

I have to imagine that at some point bands will start broadcasting high-quality streams of themselves on periscope. I was disappointed that all the Stones are doing is the "tattoo parlor" and what-not. Hopefully that will change at some point and we will all have one link to watch and it will have a high-speed connection.

Quote
treaclefingers
I was wondering how long it would be before the voice of sober second thought and reason had you change the thread title.

I don't believe he was given a choice in the matter. Perhaps he would have worded it a bit differently. There is quite a difference between "A very upset post by something" and "A very upset by something post", perhaps there was some humor involved.

peace

Unfortunately, Periscope is in its infancy and many upgrades will eventually arrive as more investment comes on board. Until stable equipment is developed for people to broadcast with, we will be stuck with low quality video, bad signals that cut in and out, and drops. Fortunately, the audio is brilliant, when it is streaming uninterrupted.

The only worry that I can see is if some musician or promoter claims trademark or copyright infringement from illegal broadcasts and threaten legal action to shut down the service.

Quote
The Sicilian
Unfortunately, Periscope is in its infancy and many upgrades will eventually arrive as more investment comes on board. Until stable equipment is developed for people to broadcast with, we will be stuck with low quality video, bad signals that cut in and out, and drops. Fortunately, the audio is brilliant, when it is streaming uninterrupted.

The only worry that I can see is if some musician or promoter claims trademark or copyright infringement from illegal broadcasts and threaten legal action to shut down the service.

I think that ship has sailed. This is a new way of marketing the bands so I see this growing. Probably will figure out a way to monetize it as well.

Quote
The Sicilian
Unfortunately, Periscope is in its infancy and many upgrades will eventually arrive as more investment comes on board. Until stable equipment is developed for people to broadcast with, we will be stuck with low quality video, bad signals that cut in and out, and drops. Fortunately, the audio is brilliant, when it is streaming uninterrupted.

The only worry that I can see is if some musician or promoter claims trademark or copyright infringement from illegal broadcasts and threaten legal action to shut down the service.

The copyright issues are being handled much like YouTube it seems. People have broadcast boxing title fights, HBO Game of Thrones, etc. Periscope takes down broadcasts when they are given a complaint that they determine to be valid (just like YouTube does.)

Many believe that the fact that the quality isn't great is actually good for the performer involved (e.g. the rolling stones). Watching a periscope isn't as good as being there, in fact it makes you want to be there even more, and excites you to go out and buy tickets. The ideal win/win for everyone.

Quote
Turner68

Quote
The Sicilian
Unfortunately, Periscope is in its infancy and many upgrades will eventually arrive as more investment comes on board. Until stable equipment is developed for people to broadcast with, we will be stuck with low quality video, bad signals that cut in and out, and drops. Fortunately, the audio is brilliant, when it is streaming uninterrupted.

The only worry that I can see is if some musician or promoter claims trademark or copyright infringement from illegal broadcasts and threaten legal action to shut down the service.

The copyright issues are being handled much like YouTube it seems. People have broadcast boxing title fights, HBO Game of Thrones, etc. Periscope takes down broadcasts when they are given a complaint that they determine to be valid (just like YouTube does.)

Many believe that the fact that the quality isn't great is actually good for the performer involved (e.g. the rolling stones). Watching a periscope isn't as good as being there, in fact it makes you want to be there even more, and excites you to go out and buy tickets. The ideal win/win for everyone.

The difference being YouTube is static, more of a library, the videos come after the fact. Periscope is a live event, with no storage and replay library offered by the service that I am aware of.

At the other end, hearing a show live even with crappy video is much preferred to spending hundreds of dollars, especially when you can see every show on the tour.

If people dont want to post clickable links then there is no reason to post at all.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2015-06-20 07:07 by relms.

Quote
Turner68
The copyright issues are being handled much like YouTube it seems. People have broadcast boxing title fights, HBO Game of Thrones, etc. Periscope takes down broadcasts when they are given a complaint that they determine to be valid (just like YouTube does.)

Many believe that the fact that the quality isn't great is actually good for the performer involved (e.g. the rolling stones). Watching a periscope isn't as good as being there, in fact it makes you want to be there even more, and excites you to go out and buy tickets. The ideal win/win for everyone.

Hmmm, sounds to me like the youtube model isn't very applicable here unless people are monitoring for feeds of their events while they are happening and periscope has people standing by to take down the feeds. Obviously a difficult and expensive process considering everyone at a concert could start a broadcast. These things take time and it wouldn't be impractical to keep up with it in the course of a two hour concert,imo.

Any who exactly are the "many" people that believe poor quality feeds are good for the performers? With all due respect even the best quality feed would still be a phone camera perspective of the show and I seriously doubt the difference between a low quality feed and a high quality feed is going to motivating you to see the show or not. That's quite a stretch.

peace



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2015-06-20 07:22 by Naturalust.

Quote
relms
If people dont want to post clickable links then there is no reason to post at all.

clickable links expire. but if you know the user name of a broadcaster, you can use it to find them throughout a show. it's much more useful to have the broadcaster.

it is incredibly easy to find the links to periscope broadcasters. it's amazing that you expect anyone to post a link at all. it's like asking someone to do a google search for you. you are very lucky to have Cristiano.

i believe you were one of the people complaining about whiners on the live show thread. perhaps you should look in the mirror.

Quote
Naturalust

Quote
Turner68
The copyright issues are being handled much like YouTube it seems. People have broadcast boxing title fights, HBO Game of Thrones, etc. Periscope takes down broadcasts when they are given a complaint that they determine to be valid (just like YouTube does.)

Many believe that the fact that the quality isn't great is actually good for the performer involved (e.g. the rolling stones). Watching a periscope isn't as good as being there, in fact it makes you want to be there even more, and excites you to go out and buy tickets. The ideal win/win for everyone.

Hmmm, sounds to me like the youtube model isn't very applicable here unless people are monitoring for feeds of their events while they are happening and periscope has people standing by to take down the feeds. Obviously a difficult and expensive process considering everyone at a concert could start a broadcast. These things take time and it wouldn't be impractical to keep up with it in the course of a two hour concert,imo.

Any who exactly are the "many" people that believe poor quality feeds are good for the performers? With all due respect even the best quality feed would still be a phone camera perspective of the show and I seriously doubt the difference between a low quality feed and a high quality feed is going to motivating you to see the show or not. That's quite a stretch.

peace

peace

LOL

@#$%& @#$%& @#$%& @#$%&

Quote
Turner68

Quote
relms
If people dont want to post clickable links then there is no reason to post at all.

clickable links expire. but if you know the user name of a broadcaster, you can use it to find them throughout a show. it's much more useful to have the broadcaster.

it is incredibly easy to find the links to periscope broadcasters. it's amazing that you expect anyone to post a link at all. it's like asking someone to do a google search for you. you are very lucky to have Cristiano.

i believe you were one of the people complaining about whiners on the live show thread. perhaps you should look in the mirror.

What are you whining about kid?

I post as many or more links than anyone in those threads.

Quote
relms

Quote
Turner68

Quote
relms
If people dont want to post clickable links then there is no reason to post at all.

clickable links expire. but if you know the user name of a broadcaster, you can use it to find them throughout a show. it's much more useful to have the broadcaster.

it is incredibly easy to find the links to periscope broadcasters. it's amazing that you expect anyone to post a link at all. it's like asking someone to do a google search for you. you are very lucky to have Cristiano.

i believe you were one of the people complaining about whiners on the live show thread. perhaps you should look in the mirror.

What are you whining about kid?

I post as many or more links than anyone in those threads.

leoniod? I had a feeling that was you.

peace

Quote
Naturalust

Quote
relms

Quote
Turner68

Quote
relms
If people dont want to post clickable links then there is no reason to post at all.

clickable links expire. but if you know the user name of a broadcaster, you can use it to find them throughout a show. it's much more useful to have the broadcaster.

it is incredibly easy to find the links to periscope broadcasters. it's amazing that you expect anyone to post a link at all. it's like asking someone to do a google search for you. you are very lucky to have Cristiano.

i believe you were one of the people complaining about whiners on the live show thread. perhaps you should look in the mirror.

What are you whining about kid?

I post as many or more links than anyone in those threads.

leoniod? I had a feeling that was you.

peace

You are full of shit. Consider sometime posting something worthwhile, something actually helpful or useful. Something besides your baseless opinion.

But seriously, I have found a lot of the internet comment sections to be overrun with a certain edgy sarcasm, and it seems like only these computers can bring it out in people. The same tired complaints just become very boring. Everyone's always complaining on the internet, about whatever subject matter they're obsessing over.

I don't want to fight with people here. If I wanted to fight with someone all the time I'd have a wife. Look, can we just not complain while the shows are going on, and everyone is periscoping on the setlist threads? That's all I'm asking. Can we organize a complaint-free zone while the shows are taking place? Surely, that's not too much to ask.

Quote
SackofBrokenEggs
But seriously, I have found a lot of the internet comment sections to be overrun with a certain edgy sarcasm, and it seems like only these computers can bring it out in people. The same tired complaints just become very boring. Everyone's always complaining on the internet, about whatever subject matter they're obsessing over.

I don't want to fight with people here. If I wanted to fight with someone all the time I'd have a wife. Look, can we just not complain while the shows are going on, and everyone is periscoping on the setlist threads? That's all I'm asking. Can we organize a complaint-free zone while the shows are taking place? Surely, that's not too much to ask.

Just ignore them. I'm usually too busy listening/following Twitter/posting during a show to notice the occasional gripe from the usual suspects - unless other usual suspects insist on jumping on them and starting an unnecessary flame war right in the middle of the show thread. Have you considered that perhaps they whine in order to get a rise out of you? Go on, spoil their fun - ignore them.

Quote
Green Lady

Quote
SackofBrokenEggs
But seriously, I have found a lot of the internet comment sections to be overrun with a certain edgy sarcasm, and it seems like only these computers can bring it out in people. The same tired complaints just become very boring. Everyone's always complaining on the internet, about whatever subject matter they're obsessing over.

I don't want to fight with people here. If I wanted to fight with someone all the time I'd have a wife. Look, can we just not complain while the shows are going on, and everyone is periscoping on the setlist threads? That's all I'm asking. Can we organize a complaint-free zone while the shows are taking place? Surely, that's not too much to ask.

Just ignore them. I'm usually too busy listening/following Twitter/posting during a show to notice the occasional gripe from the usual suspects - unless other usual suspects insist on jumping on them and starting an unnecessary flame war right in the middle of the show thread. Have you considered that perhaps they whine in order to get a rise out of you? Go on, spoil their fun - ignore them.

All very good points, Green Lady. It's just that while the periscoping action is going on, and all the links are flying around, I'm just really enjoying that time I'm having with the Stones... you know, and I don't want to wade through a bunch of negative chatter in that moment. I've been to a few Stones shows over the years, but I haven't caught one for a while now, so I'm just really enjoying the couch tour online.

Can we create a space where everyone is cool for a couple hours while the shows are being broadcast to our respective homes? Can we apply the same socialization rules that we would live by, in person, here in computer land? Let's say someone hits a bum note (which is few and far between on this tour, btw), I'm going to hear it. I don't need to see ten replies about this isolated one second that was displeasing to some. Would we yell that stuff out at a show? "Hey, that one second of time sucked horribly, blah, blah!" Why even write it? That's all I'm saying. Can we just enjoy the other 7,000+ seconds of time we'll be experiencing during a show, rather than isolating that one second of time that didn't work and magnifying it, and obsessing over it?

And hey, I say: Mick Taylor, Mick Shmaylor. Now you know how I feel about that. I don't think he needs to be anywhere near this tour. I'm sure he's a great guy. He's an immensely talented guitar player, for sure. Now I've said that once. I don't need to write it 25 times a @#$%& day on this website. OK, great that's how I feel about the current guitar situation: it rocks. Perfect. I don't need to mention, "Mick Taylor, Mick Shmaylor" over and over and over again, every day for years on this website.