I say John by miles, more Power, Conviction and the Stance....
He sort of blew away everybody...Still like Jagger though...
Any thoughts ???

My thoughts are I never liked the Beatles.

Yeah, go join a Beatles forum.

People who don't like the Beatles scare me a little.

Here are some ideas to help you sleep tonight:

First level of consciousness:
- Both were great.

2nd level of consciousness:
- Both were crap, Elvis was way better.

3rd level of consciousness
- Billy Idol has the best rock 'n' roll voice, actually

4th level of consciousness:
- Rock'n'roll is crap, you'd better listen to Kanye

Quote
steffialicia
People who don't like the Beatles scare me a little.

How can someone who love pop music hate the Beatles?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2015-04-04 02:10 by RomanCandle.

I would say both on there own way..............

__________________________

Quote
RomanCandle

Quote
steffialicia
People who don't like the Beatles scare me a little.

How can someone who love pop music hate the Beatles?

Jealous people............I guess......

__________________________

Lennon by far

Quote
steffialicia
People who don't like the Beatles scare me a little.

+1

Quote
steffialicia
People who don't like the Beatles scare me a little.

Yes it just don't add up does it...
Without the Beatles the Stones would just be retiring from their 9-5's.
And the Stones would be the first to admit it.

Quote
Tonstone
Yeah, go join a Beatles forum.

This one is more fun...besides without the Beatles this forum would not exist.
Just answer the question ????

Quote
ifucantrockme
My thoughts are I never liked the Beatles.

It looks like you are having a tough time answering the question ?????

Quote
RomanCandle

Quote
steffialicia
People who don't like the Beatles scare me a little.

How can someone who love pop music hate the Beatles?

Yeah they are pretty well whacked ????

Quote
terraplane
Lennon by far

Yes !!!

You know, just the other day I heard "You Can't do That.". I go way back obviously. What a great job John did but it's like comparing apples to oranges. Both great!!!

Quote
RomanCandle
Here are some ideas to help you sleep tonight:

First level of consciousness:
- Both were great.

2nd level of consciousness:
- Both were crap, Elvis was way better.

3rd level of consciousness
- Billy Idol has the best rock 'n' roll voice, actually

4th level of consciousness:
- Rock'n'roll is crap, you'd better listen to Kanye

Wow your kool, you go thru different levels of consciousness:
But you grade a zero on accurate insight ????
I haven't slept properly since 78" right after they toured behind Some Girls....
Back when they toured behind albums that weren't 44 years old...

Jagger of course.
The Beatles is not in the same category of greatness as The Stones is. No other band is.
It annoys me that people even compare them.
Jagger could probably sing The Beatles songs really good, while Lennon singing Stones songs would have been awful.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2015-04-04 03:22 by TheBlockbuster.

Quote
NICOS
I would say both on there own way..............

This answer does not answer the question...come on you can do better ????

The thing about Lennon is, if he hadn't died prematurely, everyone would think he was horrible. He was on an extreme downward projectery at the time of his death. His last album was hideous.

Quote
steffialicia
You know, just the other day I heard "You Can't do That.". I go way back obviously. What a great job John did but it's like comparing apples to oranges. Both great!!!

Not apples and oranges at all, it is Lennon or Jagger and Rock N' Roll.

Quote
Pietro
The thing about Lennon is, if he hadn't died prematurely, everyone would think he was horrible. He was on an extreme downward projectery at the time of his death. His last album was hideous.

Sound like your about 14...am I correct ????

The best of Lennon and Jagger are both suberb and beyond comparison. But on the other end, some of Jagger's stuff is pretty bad, but he's had a much longer career to find the questionable vocals and John can't dance and sing at the same time so comparisons are still rather meaningless.

I just wish John were still around to make some modern day comparisons.

peace

The humor magazine National Lampoon put a record in 1972 where they took lines from a Lennon interview and turned it into a song. This is hilarious.

"I'm an artist, I'm as sensitive as shyte."

[www.youtube.com]

Quote
TheBlockbuster
Jagger of course.
The Beatles is not in the same category of greatness as The Stones is. No other band is.
It annoys me that people even compare them.
Jagger could probably sing The Beatles songs really good, while Lennon singing Stones songs would have been awful.

My guess is that your about 13 years old....Correct
I can tell by your grammer...
The Beatles is not in the same category of greatness as The Stones is

Without the Beatles the Stones would just be retiring from their 9-5's.
And the Stones would be the first to admit it.

Quote
2120Wolf

Quote
TheBlockbuster
Jagger of course.
The Beatles is not in the same category of greatness as The Stones is. No other band is.
It annoys me that people even compare them.
Jagger could probably sing The Beatles songs really good, while Lennon singing Stones songs would have been awful.

My guess is that your about 13 years old....Correct
I can tell by your grammer...
The Beatles is not in the same category of greatness as The Stones is

Without the Beatles the Stones would just be retiring from their 9-5's.
And the Stones would be the first to admit it.

Oh please, sorry that I'm not from an English speaking country...

Quote
Naturalust
The best of Lennon and Jagger are both suberb and beyond comparison. But on the other end, some of Jagger's stuff is pretty bad, but he's had a much longer career to find the questionable vocals and John can't dance and sing at the same time so comparisons are still rather meaningless.

I just wish John were still around to make some modern day comparisons.

peace

Skip the modern day 62-70

Quote
TheBlockbuster

Quote
2120Wolf

Quote
TheBlockbuster
Jagger of course.
The Beatles is not in the same category of greatness as The Stones is. No other band is.
It annoys me that people even compare them.
Jagger could probably sing The Beatles songs really good, while Lennon singing Stones songs would have been awful.

My guess is that your about 13 years old....Correct
I can tell by your grammer...
The Beatles is not in the same category of greatness as The Stones is

Without the Beatles the Stones would just be retiring from their 9-5's.
And the Stones would be the first to admit it.

Oh please, sorry that I'm not from an English speaking country...

Yes I can tell by your musical knowledge...Very Well !!!

Quote
2120Wolf

Quote
TheBlockbuster

Quote
2120Wolf

Quote
TheBlockbuster
Jagger of course.
The Beatles is not in the same category of greatness as The Stones is. No other band is.
It annoys me that people even compare them.
Jagger could probably sing The Beatles songs really good, while Lennon singing Stones songs would have been awful.

My guess is that your about 13 years old....Correct
I can tell by your grammer...
The Beatles is not in the same category of greatness as The Stones is

Without the Beatles the Stones would just be retiring from their 9-5's.
And the Stones would be the first to admit it.

Oh please, sorry that I'm not from an English speaking country...

Yes I can tell by your musical knowledge...Very Well !!!

Why is musical knowledge equal to thinking The Beatles is a good band?
I've simply never felt anything other than boredom when hearing their songs.



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2015-04-04 03:40 by TheBlockbuster.

Both are great...but I prefer Jagger's.