For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
IrixQuote
CaptainCorella
Eh?
WWW was not invented until 1991/2. The Internet was around, and had been around for some time, but mainly based in Universities (& military).
The first proposal of the Hypertext based WWW has been made in March 1989: [en.wikipedia.org] . The origins of the Internet date back in the 1960s.
Quote
CaptainCorella
I was questioning another poster's observation that WWW "arrived" in 1989! Personally I was using the Internet in the mid-Late 1980's.
Quote
IrixQuote
CaptainCorella
Eh?
WWW was not invented until 1991/2. The Internet was around, and had been around for some time, but mainly based in Universities (& military).
The first proposal of the Hypertext based WWW has been made in March 1989: [en.wikipedia.org] . The origins of the Internet date back in the 1960s.
Quote
mtaylor
Hi Mick, take a Nag Champa and HP and you will be alright
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
Winning Ugly VXII
I wonder what the Stones' prior commitments are at the end of November.
I also wonder why they box themselves into a corner to the point where they cannot reschedule a single concert.
You'd figure that they would give themselves a little window of time for such situations (especially considering their ages) .
Good points...they should allow themselves a bit more wiggle room.
Quote
Long John StonerQuote
treaclefingersQuote
Winning Ugly VXII
I wonder what the Stones' prior commitments are at the end of November.
I also wonder why they box themselves into a corner to the point where they cannot reschedule a single concert.
You'd figure that they would give themselves a little window of time for such situations (especially considering their ages) .
Good points...they should allow themselves a bit more wiggle room.
I think it is time for people to accept that it is exactly for these reasons the Stones DON'T re-schedule at this stage. The lead singer is 71 years old, acting as if he's 21 or 31. Things like throat infections are going to happen to a 71 year old man. Moreover, the drummer is 74. He just might feel like screw it, I'm not doing this any longer than I have to, especially at this time of year. It wouldn't surprise me a bit if the band's reasoning is well, they're going to be refunded the ticket price and people who booked flights should have purchased flight insurance, especially for a flight to Australia from anywhere.
These are the realities of a band whose average age is 71 years of age.
Quote
Long John StonerQuote
treaclefingersQuote
Winning Ugly VXII
I wonder what the Stones' prior commitments are at the end of November.
I also wonder why they box themselves into a corner to the point where they cannot reschedule a single concert.
You'd figure that they would give themselves a little window of time for such situations (especially considering their ages) .
Good points...they should allow themselves a bit more wiggle room.
I think it is time for people to accept that it is exactly for these reasons the Stones DON'T re-schedule at this stage. The lead singer is 71 years old, acting as if he's 21 or 31. Things like throat infections are going to happen to a 71 year old man. Moreover, the drummer is 74. He just might feel like screw it, I'm not doing this any longer than I have to, especially at this time of year. It wouldn't surprise me a bit if the band's reasoning is well, they're going to be refunded the ticket price and people who booked flights should have purchased flight insurance, especially for a flight to Australia from anywhere.
These are the realities of a band whose average age is 71 years of age.
Quote
More Hot RocksQuote
Long John StonerQuote
treaclefingersQuote
Winning Ugly VXII
I wonder what the Stones' prior commitments are at the end of November.
I also wonder why they box themselves into a corner to the point where they cannot reschedule a single concert.
You'd figure that they would give themselves a little window of time for such situations (especially considering their ages) .
Good points...they should allow themselves a bit more wiggle room.
I think it is time for people to accept that it is exactly for these reasons the Stones DON'T re-schedule at this stage. The lead singer is 71 years old, acting as if he's 21 or 31. Things like throat infections are going to happen to a 71 year old man. Moreover, the drummer is 74. He just might feel like screw it, I'm not doing this any longer than I have to, especially at this time of year. It wouldn't surprise me a bit if the band's reasoning is well, they're going to be refunded the ticket price and people who booked flights should have purchased flight insurance, especially for a flight to Australia from anywhere.
These are the realities of a band whose average age is 71 years of age.
I heard the exact same thing about their age when they were in their 40's..........
Quote
mikesnaps
This is a terrible situation. I know people have been relating their own experience of having a concert cancelled. This scenario is a bit different. These poor fans have had the same show cancelled twice!
Fans were very understanding when Mick pulled out of the tour in March. Many people lost money ie flights, accommodation etc, only a small percentage wanted a refund, they were prepared to wait 6 months to see the Stones and wear any financial loss so they could see the band (probably for the last time in Australia).
Then to have the show cancelled again with no reschedule is not good enough. Fans were very sympathetic to Mick with the tragedy he endured earlier this year. I think the Stones owe these fans. A concert should be rescheduled after Auckland even if the Stones have to dig into their own (deep) pockets to pull it off.
My heart goes out to the fans I know how elated my wife and I were to walk into Adelaide oval after waiting months, it's not good enough for Keith to write "shit happens on to Sydney". These fans deserved better whatever the logistical problems rescheduling would have presented!
Quote
Long John StonerQuote
mikesnaps
This is a terrible situation. I know people have been relating their own experience of having a concert cancelled. This scenario is a bit different. These poor fans have had the same show cancelled twice!
Fans were very understanding when Mick pulled out of the tour in March. Many people lost money ie flights, accommodation etc, only a small percentage wanted a refund, they were prepared to wait 6 months to see the Stones and wear any financial loss so they could see the band (probably for the last time in Australia).
Then to have the show cancelled again with no reschedule is not good enough. Fans were very sympathetic to Mick with the tragedy he endured earlier this year. I think the Stones owe these fans. A concert should be rescheduled after Auckland even if the Stones have to dig into their own (deep) pockets to pull it off.
My heart goes out to the fans I know how elated my wife and I were to walk into Adelaide oval after waiting months, it's not good enough for Keith to write "shit happens on to Sydney". These fans deserved better whatever the logistical problems rescheduling would have presented!
Oh please. The Stones don't owe anybody. Some of you really need to separate yourselves from your Stones jones and observe real life.
Quote
Vandefruits
It's a Capitol Crime !!!
:-)
(In response to Treaclefingers comment above: It's no Hanging matter!)
Quote
Long John StonerQuote
treaclefingersQuote
Winning Ugly VXII
I wonder what the Stones' prior commitments are at the end of November.
I also wonder why they box themselves into a corner to the point where they cannot reschedule a single concert.
You'd figure that they would give themselves a little window of time for such situations (especially considering their ages) .
Good points...they should allow themselves a bit more wiggle room.
I think it is time for people to accept that it is exactly for these reasons the Stones DON'T re-schedule at this stage. The lead singer is 71 years old, acting as if he's 21 or 31. Things like throat infections are going to happen to a 71 year old man. Moreover, the drummer is 74. He just might feel like screw it, I'm not doing this any longer than I have to, especially at this time of year. It wouldn't surprise me a bit if the band's reasoning is well, they're going to be refunded the ticket price and people who booked flights should have purchased flight insurance, especially for a flight to Australia from anywhere.
These are the realities of a band whose average age is 71 years of age.
Quote
with sssoul
... The fact that the Stones don't spell it all out only means one thing:
We don't know the nature of the obstacle to rescheduling.
It could be family issues. It could be crucial backline/backup people. It could be all kinds of things.
Judging people harshly when we don't know the facts is such a small-hearted thing to do.
How about we all go forth and make the world a more beautiful place instead?
I'm sorry for everyone who's disappointed. Mick, be well as soon as you can.
Quote
DoomandGloom
Anyone that can afford the extravagance of jet setting to follow a band can afford the loss. The Stones can't really be responsible for this extraordinary fanaticism, Their decision starts with their accountants and it's likely they'd need re-rent gear, vehicles and people to add a date. Areschedule they needit'sto cancel another show this will mount up and they'll have set a precedent. The band has acted in good faith with this rescheduled tour anyone who thinks otherwise expects the impractical.
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
Vandefruits
It's a Capitol Crime !!!
:-)
(In response to Treaclefingers comment above: It's no Hanging matter!)
Quote
Long John StonerQuote
mikesnaps
This is a terrible situation. I know people have been relating their own experience of having a concert cancelled. This scenario is a bit different. These poor fans have had the same show cancelled twice!
Fans were very understanding when Mick pulled out of the tour in March. Many people lost money ie flights, accommodation etc, only a small percentage wanted a refund, they were prepared to wait 6 months to see the Stones and wear any financial loss so they could see the band (probably for the last time in Australia).
Then to have the show cancelled again with no reschedule is not good enough. Fans were very sympathetic to Mick with the tragedy he endured earlier this year. I think the Stones owe these fans. A concert should be rescheduled after Auckland even if the Stones have to dig into their own (deep) pockets to pull it off.
My heart goes out to the fans I know how elated my wife and I were to walk into Adelaide oval after waiting months, it's not good enough for Keith to write "shit happens on to Sydney". These fans deserved better whatever the logistical problems rescheduling would have presented!
Oh please. The Stones don't owe anybody. Some of you really need to separate yourselves from your Stones jones and observe real life.