For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
bv
Charlie is laughing because of something Mick said during the presentation of him.
Quote
z
At 7:14 you can see Mick asking Taylor to stop playing. He wants to hear the audience in his "everybody say oh yeah" thing. Then at 7:53 he shouts "Shut up already, damn!".
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
with sssoul
Splendid review indeed, Paul - thank you!
And thank you Dandelion P for that brilliant photo of Keith - who took it, please and thank you?
And someone PLEASE tell us more about Mick telling the band "Shut up already! Damn!" during Ramber -
when did he yell that, and what moved him to? I love it! And did they shut up already or not so much?
Minds want to know! :E
#StonesTelAviv
Quote
z
At 7:14 you can see Mick asking Taylor to stop playing. He wants to hear the audience in his "everybody say oh yeah" thing. Then at 7:53 he shouts "Shut up already, damn!".
Quote
His MajestyQuote
z
At 7:14 you can see Mick asking Taylor to stop playing. He wants to hear the audience in his "everybody say oh yeah" thing. Then at 7:53 he shouts "Shut up already, damn!".
Ace version, but Taylor is a bit irritating on this one.
Jagger Wow!!!
Quote
with sssoulQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
with sssoul
Splendid review indeed, Paul - thank you!
And thank you Dandelion P for that brilliant photo of Keith - who took it, please and thank you?
And someone PLEASE tell us more about Mick telling the band "Shut up already! Damn!" during Ramber -
when did he yell that, and what moved him to? I love it! And did they shut up already or not so much?
Minds want to know! :E
#StonesTelAviv
Dandelion P my sweet, I'm too dense to know what you might mean by that. What might you mean?
Quote
lem motlow
what bothers me is the attitude that the fans who go see these shows are supposed to think they are seeing something less than the shows in the distant past,as if they are getting a watered down/old slow version of the rolling stones-
that simply isnt true- the stones are far better than they were in the early 60'and are as good as they were at anytime since the 81-82 tour. that leaves only the 1969 tour and the 70's.
as good as the taylor years were, the stage,sound system,lighting rig etc from 69-72 were a joke compared to what they have now.mick jagger,after playing football stadiums for 30 years looks as though he feels cramped on an arena stage of the size they used in the early 70's.
not every show from 69-82 was some musical triumph,thats bullshit.i saw a show on the 1978 tour that was the worst gig i've ever seen and there were alot of stoned,off kilter moments during the taylor years as well.
what i'm saying is when its all over someday, if you saw the stones even one time during any era thats a big deal.when people say they saw elvis they dont say which year,its just"i saw friggin elvis,live!"
Quote
lem motlow
what bothers me is the attitude that the fans who go see these shows are supposed to think they are seeing something less than the shows in the distant past,as if they are getting a watered down/old slow version of the rolling stones-
that simply isnt true- the stones are far better than they were in the early 60'and are as good as they were at anytime since the 81-82 tour. that leaves only the 1969 tour and the 70's.
as good as the taylor years were, the stage,sound system,lighting rig etc from 69-72 were a joke compared to what they have now.mick jagger,after playing football stadiums for 30 years looks as though he feels cramped on an arena stage of the size they used in the early 70's.
not every show from 69-82 was some musical triumph,thats bullshit.i saw a show on the 1978 tour that was the worst gig i've ever seen and there were alot of stoned,off kilter moments during the taylor years as well.
what i'm saying is when its all over someday, if you saw the stones even one time during any era thats a big deal.when people say they saw elvis they dont say which year,its just"i saw friggin elvis,live!"
Quote
z
At 7:14 you can see Mick asking Taylor to stop playing. He wants to hear the audience in his "everybody say oh yeah" thing.
Then at 7:53 he shouts "Shut up already, damn!".
Quote
Deluxtone
Pauly mentioned in his very good and fullsome review how effective it was to follow T Dice with Angie. It immediately occured to me that they were also (ofcourse) successive lead singles.
This brought to my mind how 'thrilling' it would be to hear them play their seventies singles in immediate succession -
Brown Sugar, T Dice, Angie, IORR, Fool To Cry, Miss You - and then maybe Start Me Up to rond it off.
All on a B Stage ofcourse.
Ok, commence with JJF and HTW and finish with Undercover and Harlem Shuffle and you'd have a mainly WarHorse set that no-one would whinge about.
Quote
lem motlow
what bothers me is the attitude that the fans who go see these shows are supposed to think they are seeing something less than the shows in the distant past,as if they are getting a watered down/old slow version of the rolling stones-
Quote
lem motlow
... the stones are far better than they were in the early 60'...
Quote
His MajestyQuote
lem motlow
what bothers me is the attitude that the fans who go see these shows are supposed to think they are seeing something less than the shows in the distant past,as if they are getting a watered down/old slow version of the rolling stones-
What people are getting is half the band it once was. Even Jagger himself has acknowledged that they are kinda cheating using the name The Rolling Stones.Quote
lem motlow
... the stones are far better than they were in the early 60'...
Nonsense.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Since when did you start taking Mick litterally?
Quote
His MajestyQuote
DandelionPowderman
Since when did you start taking Mick litterally?
When ever his comments resonate with what clearly has happened or is happening.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
His comment is both correct and silly. Factually correct, but silly because it's a group of five musicians - and one of them can never be more important than the whole band. Hence, of course they should still be the real Rolling Stones.
Quote
His MajestyQuote
DandelionPowderman
His comment is both correct and silly. Factually correct, but silly because it's a group of five musicians - and one of them can never be more important than the whole band. Hence, of course they should still be the real Rolling Stones.
I didn't know you smoked crack.