For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
RollingFreakQuote
GasLightStreet
It all makes sense now.
Yet.
The Who have drank the wrong tea to fire Zak.
They're a solid load of old tossers. They're not worth bothering with. Why anyone would pay to go see "The Who" is a tosser.
The Fake Who.
I know its been said a ton of times but while I'm not happy with what the Who has done in the last recent bit, they are no faker than the current Stones are. I don't know how anyone could argue that.
Quote
umakmehrd
Agreed.. at this point it's really all nostalgia for both bands.. but its the music we grew up on and love.... I'm looking forward to Vancouver Sept 23... don't really care who's (pardon the pun) on the Drums or Bass... I'm there to see Pete's windmills and Rogers Mic twirls
Quote
GasLightStreet
The Rolling Stones don't lie to their fans.
Quote
GasLightStreet
It all makes sense now.
Yet.
The Who have drank the wrong tea to fire Zak.
They're a solid load of old tossers. They're not worth bothering with. Why anyone would pay to go see "The Who" is a tosser.
The Fake Who.
Quote
RollingFreakQuote
GasLightStreet
The Rolling Stones don't lie to their fans.
Insane. Absolutely insane. If its the Kool Aid you want to drink, that's fine, but all bands and people lie. It just happens. Keith himself literally said there is no Stones without Charlie Watts and we still have the Stones (cue the "Charlie hand picked Steve so that the show could go on without him").
Its not good to be too obsessed with anything cause its one step away from fervent cult support.
Quote
RollingFreakQuote
GasLightStreet
The Rolling Stones don't lie to their fans.
Insane. Absolutely insane. If its the Kool Aid you want to drink, that's fine, but all bands and people lie. It just happens. Keith himself literally said there is no Stones without Charlie Watts and we still have the Stones (cue the "Charlie hand picked Steve so that the show could go on without him").
Its not good to be too obsessed with anything cause its one step away from fervent cult support.
Quote
bye bye johnny
From Zak Starkey, May 28:
This is fukin total bollox .
I was fired …
Roger’s new word for it is ‘retired’ to complete my other musical projects .
I called Roger last week and told him in person I had spent nearly 2 months at my studio in Jamaica completing my studio projects. That I had a mantra of the cosmos single out next week and then I was completely available for the foreseeable future… he was a little surprised but understood. It’s true - I have no plan’s whatsoever for the fall as I thought I was touring with The Who and my mantra band mates are v busy in oasis and happy Mondays until the new year . So this is simply a load of bollox … Am I fired , retired, deffo not tired as I’m 20 years younger than these guys as they keep saying .
Dropping two beats on our second show is not a firing offence - I’ve watched the show on tv I can’t see where I dropped them - I looked everywhere- it’s the who ffs if it was perfect it would be so f*cking boring …
[www.instagram.com]
Quote
ProfessorWolfQuote
RollingFreakQuote
GasLightStreet
The Rolling Stones don't lie to their fans.
Insane. Absolutely insane. If its the Kool Aid you want to drink, that's fine, but all bands and people lie. It just happens. Keith himself literally said there is no Stones without Charlie Watts and we still have the Stones (cue the "Charlie hand picked Steve so that the show could go on without him").
Its not good to be too obsessed with anything cause its one step away from fervent cult support.
to be fair i think charlie said use steve to finish the dates they had scheduled while he recovered not meaning replace me with him if i die
that's where the stretching the truth part comes in (though who knows i wasn't there)
another one that comes to mind is keith being asked if taylor would join them on the zip code tour and him saying no that he thinks he's sick or something and in the next sentence they fact check him by reaching out to taylor's people who say he's not sick
but that's not to take away from how pathetically manipulative and shameful rodgers been towards zak
just that the stones aren't angels either
Quote
Happy Jack
As it seems The Who is headed into the twilight I can look back and make a few observations:
Ive been a fan of the band for 30 years; My first was concert was in 2000 at 17 in Tinley Park, IL. It turned out to be John's last tour with the band and they rocked. I saw them three times after that (the last being in 2007).
I love The Who and will always love the musi. Their output from 1965-1978 (and even into 1982) is great if unfortunately and unfairly overshadowed by their peers.
But since 1982 the failure of the band to produce more than two albums seems a sad state. Theyve coasted on the hits for 40 years and still will. But I feel that they are quickly becoming forgotten by people, critics and everyone else. This latest fracas with Zak only seems to undermine a latter day shaky legacy.
Its possible that while the Beatles, Stones, Zeppelin and Floyd will live on, The Who will be forgotten within a generation, if not sooner, and their massive contributions to popular music will go unnoticed.
Quote
Happy Jack
As it seems The Who is headed into the twilight I can look back and make a few observations:
Ive been a fan of the band for 30 years; My first was concert was in 2000 at 17 in Tinley Park, IL. It turned out to be John's last tour with the band and they rocked. I saw them three times after that (the last being in 2007).
I love The Who and will always love the musi. Their output from 1965-1978 (and even into 1982) is great if unfortunately and unfairly overshadowed by their peers.
But since 1982 the failure of the band to produce more than two albums seems a sad state. Theyve coasted on the hits for 40 years and still will. But I feel that they are quickly becoming forgotten by people, critics and everyone else. This latest fracas with Zak only seems to undermine a latter day shaky legacy.
Its possible that while the Beatles, Stones, Zeppelin and Floyd will live on, The Who will be forgotten within a generation, if not sooner, and their massive contributions to popular music will go unnoticed.
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
Happy Jack
As it seems The Who is headed into the twilight I can look back and make a few observations:
Ive been a fan of the band for 30 years; My first was concert was in 2000 at 17 in Tinley Park, IL. It turned out to be John's last tour with the band and they rocked. I saw them three times after that (the last being in 2007).
I love The Who and will always love the musi. Their output from 1965-1978 (and even into 1982) is great if unfortunately and unfairly overshadowed by their peers.
But since 1982 the failure of the band to produce more than two albums seems a sad state. Theyve coasted on the hits for 40 years and still will. But I feel that they are quickly becoming forgotten by people, critics and everyone else. This latest fracas with Zak only seems to undermine a latter day shaky legacy.
Its possible that while the Beatles, Stones, Zeppelin and Floyd will live on, The Who will be forgotten within a generation, if not sooner, and their massive contributions to popular music will go unnoticed.
As long as there's a new CSI series introduced to the public, the Who will live on.
Quote
RollingFreakQuote
GasLightStreet
The Rolling Stones don't lie to their fans.
Insane. Absolutely insane. If its the Kool Aid you want to drink, that's fine, but all bands and people lie. It just happens. Keith himself literally said there is no Stones without Charlie Watts and we still have the Stones (cue the "Charlie hand picked Steve so that the show could go on without him").
Its not good to be too obsessed with anything cause its one step away from fervent cult support.
Quote
tommycharles
When they get to one with Squeezebox as the theme it’s probably time to call it, though.
Quote
dkwalika
Wow, I looked at the Sept. 9 Chicago show on Ticketmaster, and there are a lot of unsold seats. Shocking. Regardless of why, it's sad.
Quote
RollingFreak
Why are you still in this thread if you don't like the current version of the Who and you know that's what's gonna be talked about? We can call you up when classic Who talk comes around but it just feels like a waste of time for you and us. But I'm assuming you must (and I'm guessing that comment right there is gonna be what keeps you here) and we all just have to accept that. It is the internet after all.
Quote
bye bye johnny
“I was speaking to Pete Townshend the other night about the conception of an idea, the writing of an idea, the producing of an idea, and the playing of it… and the commitment to takes to mix it. And it’s daunting. It’s f*cking daunting.”
Ah, says, Clash – so you’re still in touch with The Who?
“Oh I text Pete, and I speak to Roger every week”.
Hang on…
“So, I got fired twice in two weeks, right. And Roger was on the phone two days ago, and said: look, don’t put your drums in to storage just yet, in case we need you. And I said, you what?! Let me know before I start playing drums with Noddy Holder or summin!”
Quote
RollingFreakQuote
bye bye johnny
“I was speaking to Pete Townshend the other night about the conception of an idea, the writing of an idea, the producing of an idea, and the playing of it… and the commitment to takes to mix it. And it’s daunting. It’s f*cking daunting.”
Ah, says, Clash – so you’re still in touch with The Who?
“Oh I text Pete, and I speak to Roger every week”.
Hang on…
“So, I got fired twice in two weeks, right. And Roger was on the phone two days ago, and said: look, don’t put your drums in to storage just yet, in case we need you. And I said, you what?! Let me know before I start playing drums with Noddy Holder or summin!”
Bands are so @#$%& weird.