Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto Page: PreviousFirst...107108109110111112113114115116117...LastNext
Current Page: 112 of 132
Re: OT: The Who stuff
Date: April 18, 2025 08:47

Quote
tommycharles
Quote
GeirGG
I was there. I don’t believe for a second that it had anything to do with how he played. But things happen. People have their reasons, and this is the story they want to share with the public. Bands evolve though. Next chapter. The Who goes on. I personally loved the version of the band that played RAH a few years back (Rogers band), and would love to see them do a tour.

If they come back through here again I would see them, but the clips I've seen from Roger's most recent solo band sound pretty anemic to me.

This doesn't feel that long ago, but somehow it was 18 years ago - the power they still had here is amazing I think. I could listen to this version of the band jam for a really long time. [www.youtube.com]

Wow tnx. My first and only who gig! You could buy a dvd of every show but i lost it

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: MadMax ()
Date: April 18, 2025 14:54

Am I wrong or was there no plexi glass in front of Zak's drums at RAH? Even though he used the particular sort of electric drums I seem to hear Roger saying after quitting singing that "there is no plexi/barrier..." (incomprehensible, maybe he says "there's no pitch here" but my suggestion would make sense) confused smiley

On a side note, Pete's guitar roadie seems to be ready with the Gibson jumbo had they chosen to perform it acoustically, quick thinking!



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2025-04-18 14:59 by MadMax.

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: Big Al ()
Date: April 18, 2025 15:24

Quote
MadMax
Am I wrong or was there no plexi glass in front of Zak's drums at RAH? Even though he used the particular sort of electric drums I seem to hear Roger saying after quitting singing that "there is no plexi/barrier..." (incomprehensible, maybe he says "there's no pitch here" but my suggestion would make sense) confused smiley

On a side note, Pete's guitar roadie seems to be ready with the Gibson jumbo had they chosen to perform it acoustically, quick thinking!

Max, some Oasis fans are speculating that this’ll mean Zak will rejoining Noel and Liam smileys with beer

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: MadMax ()
Date: April 18, 2025 17:35

Quote
Big Al
Quote
MadMax
Am I wrong or was there no plexi glass in front of Zak's drums at RAH? Even though he used the particular sort of electric drums I seem to hear Roger saying after quitting singing that "there is no plexi/barrier..." (incomprehensible, maybe he says "there's no pitch here" but my suggestion would make sense) confused smiley

On a side note, Pete's guitar roadie seems to be ready with the Gibson jumbo had they chosen to perform it acoustically, quick thinking!

Max, some Oasis fans are speculating that this’ll mean Zak will rejoining Noel and Liam smileys with beer

Hopefully Al! As Zak's probably in monthly contact with Andy (due to Mantra Of The Cosmos) they must lobby it to the brothers. To paraphrase Keith in -75; "after all, this is an English band!" smileys with beer



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2025-04-18 17:36 by MadMax.

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: tommycharles ()
Date: April 18, 2025 19:11

Quote
Big Al
Quote
MadMax
Am I wrong or was there no plexi glass in front of Zak's drums at RAH? Even though he used the particular sort of electric drums I seem to hear Roger saying after quitting singing that "there is no plexi/barrier..." (incomprehensible, maybe he says "there's no pitch here" but my suggestion would make sense) confused smiley

On a side note, Pete's guitar roadie seems to be ready with the Gibson jumbo had they chosen to perform it acoustically, quick thinking!

Max, some Oasis fans are speculating that this’ll mean Zak will rejoining Noel and Liam smileys with beer

I really hope that doesn’t happen - Zak is a great drummer but he didn’t fit Oasis live at all in ‘04-06. Joey Waronker has already signed on for the tour and will be a far better fit.

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: MartinB ()
Date: April 18, 2025 19:33

Quote
peoplewitheyes
I thought Zak played great at the RAH, but the drum sound was terrible. Muted and quiet. Level 42 were the warm up act, and their drums sounded so much more vital and kicked you in the guts.

Is it a simple difference of elec. v acoustic drum kits?

I love the Who dearly, and think Roger has an incredible voice, but I have increasingly come to the conclusion over the last couple of decades that he is a bit of a tw@t.

I also thought the was no problem with the drummer. If there was a problem, it would be the stage sound system/people, not the drummer.

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: More Hot Rocks ()
Date: April 18, 2025 19:51

Quote
MartinB
Quote
peoplewitheyes
I thought Zak played great at the RAH, but the drum sound was terrible. Muted and quiet. Level 42 were the warm up act, and their drums sounded so much more vital and kicked you in the guts.

Is it a simple difference of elec. v acoustic drum kits?

I love the Who dearly, and think Roger has an incredible voice, but I have increasingly come to the conclusion over the last couple of decades that he is a bit of a tw@t.

I also thought the was no problem with the drummer. If there was a problem, it would be the stage sound system/people, not the drummer.

Roger said it was his playing not the sound system.

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: More Hot Rocks ()
Date: April 18, 2025 19:51

Quote
MartinB
Quote
peoplewitheyes
I thought Zak played great at the RAH, but the drum sound was terrible. Muted and quiet. Level 42 were the warm up act, and their drums sounded so much more vital and kicked you in the guts.

Is it a simple difference of elec. v acoustic drum kits?

I love the Who dearly, and think Roger has an incredible voice, but I have increasingly come to the conclusion over the last couple of decades that he is a bit of a tw@t.

I also thought the was no problem with the drummer. If there was a problem, it would be the stage sound system/people, not the drummer.

Roger said it was his playing not the sound system. Done

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: MadMax ()
Date: April 18, 2025 21:35

Quote
tommycharles
Quote
Big Al
Quote
MadMax
Am I wrong or was there no plexi glass in front of Zak's drums at RAH? Even though he used the particular sort of electric drums I seem to hear Roger saying after quitting singing that "there is no plexi/barrier..." (incomprehensible, maybe he says "there's no pitch here" but my suggestion would make sense) confused smiley

On a side note, Pete's guitar roadie seems to be ready with the Gibson jumbo had they chosen to perform it acoustically, quick thinking!

Max, some Oasis fans are speculating that this’ll mean Zak will rejoining Noel and Liam smileys with beer

I really hope that doesn’t happen - Zak is a great drummer but he didn’t fit Oasis live at all in ‘04-06. Joey Waronker has already signed on for the tour and will be a far better fit.

Interesting, I thought he really fit with Oasis. Listen to Cigarettes and Alcohol from Ryman in Nashville and then let me know what you think...

He was ace during the whole Don't Believe The Truth tour, songs like Acquiesce and Live Forever got their former glory back with that "battleship-like" drumming thumbs up

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: Munichhilton ()
Date: April 18, 2025 23:19

Quote
MadMax
Quote
tommycharles
Quote
Big Al
Quote
MadMax
Am I wrong or was there no plexi glass in front of Zak's drums at RAH? Even though he used the particular sort of electric drums I seem to hear Roger saying after quitting singing that "there is no plexi/barrier..." (incomprehensible, maybe he says "there's no pitch here" but my suggestion would make sense) confused smiley

On a side note, Pete's guitar roadie seems to be ready with the Gibson jumbo had they chosen to perform it acoustically, quick thinking!

Max, some Oasis fans are speculating that this’ll mean Zak will rejoining Noel and Liam smileys with beer

I really hope that doesn’t happen - Zak is a great drummer but he didn’t fit Oasis live at all in ‘04-06. Joey Waronker has already signed on for the tour and will be a far better fit.

Interesting, I thought he really fit with Oasis. Listen to Cigarettes and Alcohol from Ryman in Nashville and then let me know what you think...

He was ace during the whole Don't Believe The Truth tour, songs like Acquiesce and Live Forever got their former glory back with that "battleship-like" drumming thumbs up

Kind of sort of gotta agree. Zak is brilliant on songs like The Shock Of The Lightning...The only thing better about that song is Liam's stunningly good voice. Zak is a metronome on that until he just explodes...so good

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: GasLightStreet ()
Date: April 19, 2025 06:57

Quote
More Hot Rocks
Quote
MartinB
Quote
peoplewitheyes
I thought Zak played great at the RAH, but the drum sound was terrible. Muted and quiet. Level 42 were the warm up act, and their drums sounded so much more vital and kicked you in the guts.

Is it a simple difference of elec. v acoustic drum kits?

I love the Who dearly, and think Roger has an incredible voice, but I have increasingly come to the conclusion over the last couple of decades that he is a bit of a tw@t.

I also thought the was no problem with the drummer. If there was a problem, it would be the stage sound system/people, not the drummer.

Roger said it was his playing not the sound system. Done

There's nothing egregious with the drumming.

Roger couldn't deal.

Roger is done. He just won't fully admit it truthfully.

Can't compare Zak to Keith - Keith Moon would be 78 years old and NOT very likely not playing like he did.

It's atrocious that they fired Zak.

It's weak.

They're done.

Roger has become an old tart and he's upset that he can't keep up with what's presented.

They're way past done. They should've stopped a long time ago.

The Who: 1964-2025.

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: paulywaul ()
Date: April 19, 2025 13:40

Quote
GasLightStreet
Quote
More Hot Rocks
Quote
MartinB
Quote
peoplewitheyes
I thought Zak played great at the RAH, but the drum sound was terrible. Muted and quiet. Level 42 were the warm up act, and their drums sounded so much more vital and kicked you in the guts.

Is it a simple difference of elec. v acoustic drum kits?

I love the Who dearly, and think Roger has an incredible voice, but I have increasingly come to the conclusion over the last couple of decades that he is a bit of a tw@t.

I also thought the was no problem with the drummer. If there was a problem, it would be the stage sound system/people, not the drummer.

Roger said it was his playing not the sound system. Done

There's nothing egregious with the drumming.

Roger couldn't deal.

Roger is done. He just won't fully admit it truthfully.

Can't compare Zak to Keith - Keith Moon would be 78 years old and NOT very likely not playing like he did.

It's atrocious that they fired Zak.

It's weak.

They're done.

Roger has become an old tart and he's upset that he can't keep up with what's presented.

They're way past done. They should've stopped a long time ago.

The Who: 1964-2025.

Not entirely sure if they're "way past done", but it is well within the realms of possibility that they indeed "are done" ! Were that to be the case, it seems to me to be a bit of a sad way for it to end, but sometimes things just end in ways we least expect !?

[ If you don't believe what I'm singing, at three o'clock in the morning, babe, well I'm singing my song for you ]



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2025-04-19 21:24 by paulywaul.

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: StonedRambler ()
Date: April 19, 2025 16:42

For all that didn’t get the news yet:

Zak is back.

Pete Townshend just posted some random selfie on instagram announcing it

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: peoplewitheyes ()
Date: April 19, 2025 16:43

Hahaha!

Just saw that Zak's back

What a joke!

It did get them a fair few column inches, though. Guess that's all that counts

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: StonedRambler ()
Date: April 19, 2025 16:46

Quote
peoplewitheyes
Hahaha!

Just saw that Zak's back

What a joke!

It did get them a fair few column inches, though. Guess that's all that counts

Such chaos wouldn’t have happened with the Stones. They‘re just far more professional on a business level

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: Munichhilton ()
Date: April 19, 2025 17:16

Zak should get Roger removed

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: treaclefingers ()
Date: April 19, 2025 17:26

Quote
Munichhilton
Zak should get Roger removed

Now that would be an eminence front.

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: GS1978 ()
Date: April 19, 2025 17:45

Quote
peoplewitheyes
Hahaha!

Just saw that Zak's back

What a joke!

It did get them a fair few column inches, though. Guess that's all that counts

Variety

The Who are just following Pete's advice to the Stones.

Rock n Roll HOF Ceremony

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: Cristiano Radtke ()
Date: April 19, 2025 17:59



News Flash! Who Backs Zak!

He's not being asked to step down from The Who.

There have been some communication issues, personal and private on all sides, that needed to be dealt with, and these have been aired happily.

Roger and I would like Zak to tighten up his latest evolved drumming style to accommodate our non-orchestral line up and he has readily agreed. I take responsibility for some of the confusion. Our TCT shows at the Royal Albert Hall were a little tricky for me. I thought that four and a half weeks would be enough time to recover completely from having a complete knee replacement. (Why did I ever think I could land on my knees?) Wrong!

Maybe we didn’t put enough time into sound checks, giving us problems on stage. The sound in the centre of the stage is always the most difficult to work with. Roger did nothing wrong but fiddle with his in-ear monitors. Zak made a few mistakes and he has apologised. Albeit with a rubber duck drummer.

We are a family, this blew up very quickly and got too much oxygen. It’s over. We move forward now with optimism and fire in our bellies.

As for Roger, fans can enjoy his forthcoming solo shows with his fabulous drummer, Scott Devours, who it was rumoured might replace Zak in The Who and has always been supportive of the band.

I owe Scott an apology for not crushing that rumour before it spread. He has been hurt by this. I promise to buy him a very long drink and give him a hug.

Pete Townshend
19 April 2025

[x.com]

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: peoplewitheyes ()
Date: April 19, 2025 18:11

Nice to read such honesty from PT

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: Big Al ()
Date: April 19, 2025 18:50

Quote
peoplewitheyes
Nice to read such honesty from PT

Indeed! Such an honest and clarifying message from Pete, there.

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: Beast ()
Date: April 19, 2025 18:55

Quote
Big Al
Quote
peoplewitheyes
Nice to read such honesty from PT

Indeed! Such an honest and clarifying message from Pete, there.

Indeed indeed! Let's see if Roger deigns to explain his take on it in similar spirit, Am not holding my breath but you never know.

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: paulywaul ()
Date: April 19, 2025 22:08

Quote
Beast
Quote
Big Al
Quote
peoplewitheyes
Nice to read such honesty from PT

Indeed! Such an honest and clarifying message from Pete, there.

Indeed indeed! Let's see if Roger deigns to explain his take on it in similar spirit, Am not holding my breath but you never know.

Neither am I, but we'll see !

[ If you don't believe what I'm singing, at three o'clock in the morning, babe, well I'm singing my song for you ]

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: peoplewitheyes ()
Date: April 19, 2025 22:17

''Roger and I would like Zak to tighten up his latest evolved drumming style ''

I admire the team spirit in this sentence, but I'm not sure I believe it...

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: MadMax ()
Date: April 19, 2025 22:37

No apologies to Zak......? confused smiley

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: BeastyBurdeny ()
Date: April 19, 2025 23:50

Quote
MadMax
No apologies to Zak......? confused smiley

It sounds like they've spoken privately, if Zak is "back". I imagine an apology happened during that convo?

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: Munichhilton ()
Date: April 20, 2025 00:58

Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
Munichhilton
Zak should get Roger removed

Now that would be an eminence front.

I'm thinking more of a slip kid, but I like your idea a tiny bit better

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: tommycharles ()
Date: April 20, 2025 02:22

Seems like the best outcome everyone involved could expect. Bless PT for still being interested enough to sort it out.

Re: OT: The Who stuff
Posted by: GasLightStreet ()
Date: April 20, 2025 02:51

Quote
peoplewitheyes
Hahaha!

Just saw that Zak's back

What a joke!

It did get them a fair few column inches, though. Guess that's all that counts

The Who are THE joke of 2025.

Goto Page: PreviousFirst...107108109110111112113114115116117...LastNext
Current Page: 112 of 132


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 428
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home