Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto Page: PreviousFirst...169170171172173174175176177178179Next
Current Page: 175 of 179
Re: Beatles vs Stones - and other Beatles stuff
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: October 13, 2021 23:57

the stones started out as a derelict blues band playing chicago blues.


Derelict blues band .... Hey yeah thats a good line sundevil ....



ROCKMAN

Re: Beatles vs Stones - and other Beatles stuff
Posted by: ds1984 ()
Date: October 14, 2021 00:08

Quote
Rockman
the stones started out as a derelict blues band playing chicago blues.


Derelict blues band .... Hey yeah thats a good line sundevil ....

The Beatles knew the Stones were good. And they were at least different enough to get along with the Beatles.

Re: Beatles vs Stones - and other Beatles stuff
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: October 14, 2021 00:20

Yeah Johnny Lennon woulda loved
the Mop Tops to be more like The Stones ....



ROCKMAN

Re: Beatles vs Stones - and other Beatles stuff
Posted by: brent72 ()
Date: October 14, 2021 09:06

I like Paul, but he sounds like a bitter old twat. Maybe he's jealous he couldn't even keep a band together for 10 years and the Stones have made it to almost 60.

Re: Beatles vs Stones - and other Beatles stuff
Posted by: MKjan ()
Date: October 14, 2021 12:29

He is jealous. His comments are foolish,and he can't handle that The Stones
are still touring.He still plays the blame John game too.

Re: Beatles vs Stones - and other Beatles stuff
Posted by: treaclefingers ()
Date: October 14, 2021 18:34

Quote
Rockman
Yeah Johnny Lennon woulda loved
the Mop Tops to be more like The Stones ....

with songs like Martha My Dear, Rocky Raccoon, Yellow Submarine, Bungalow Bill, Maxwell's Silver Hammer etc...that would have been an incredibly tall order.

Re: Beatles vs Stones - and other Beatles stuff
Posted by: Taylor1 ()
Date: October 15, 2021 00:54

Quote
ds1984
They are taking the best out of the Get Back sessions but hey that is a lot of work for just 5 good songs or so.

Compared to how fast Abbey Road was recorded, the Get Back project was mainly a musical fail.
Most of the songs from Abbey Road had already been written during the White Album and Let it Be Sessions.Early versions of Jealous Guy, Mind Games, Another Day, Junk, Back Seat of My Car, All things Must Pass , Isn’t it a Pity we’re rehearsed during the Let it Be Sessions

Re: Beatles vs Stones - and other Beatles stuff
Posted by: duke richardson ()
Date: October 15, 2021 01:11

McCartney- always good for a snide comment. And Lennon was just pure mean.
I quit listening to the Beatles, probably after I got into “ Get Your Ya Ya’s Out”
But I do love “All Things Must Pass”.

Re: Beatles vs Stones - and other Beatles stuff
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: October 15, 2021 01:16

songs like Martha My Dear, Rocky Raccoon, Yellow Submarine, Bungalow Bill, Maxwell's Silver Hammer etc...

But treacle ya forgot ...... Lavatory Lil



ROCKMAN

Re: Beatles vs Stones - and other Beatles stuff
Posted by: Dayokay ()
Date: October 15, 2021 02:05

Paul gets on fine with the Stones. I think it amuses them all that they can still wheel out a comment and get something on the front pages, and they do it when the publicity suits them.

We're a bit too old to get so tribal surely? It's all good in my book.

dayo

Re: Beatles vs Stones - and other Beatles stuff
Posted by: terraplane ()
Date: October 15, 2021 13:18

Quote
Boognish
Quote
MKjan
Quote
Boognish
Quote
MKjan
Lots of crappy songs in the Beatles catalog.
Paul periodically trolls the Stones, he can't handle their greatness, and
the Stones were/are a performing band. He has a lot of reasons to be jealous and feel threatened.
Lots of crappy songs in the Stones catalog, too.
Paul can't handle their greatness? He's a grown man, I'm pretty sure Paul is doing just fine.
Paul is jealous and feels threatened? Threatened by what? What is he jealous of? Again, he's a grown man. I'm pretty sure he's doing just fine.

Thank you, that was my point. The Beatles have a lot of crappy songs. Paul seems jealous, his childish comments are not the words of a grown man.
What does he have to be jealous about? He's Paul f*cking McCartney. He was in THE BEATLES. Is he jealous because the Stones are still around and his band is not? That's silly. Paul is still playing stadiums just like they are. It's not like he's been relegated to playing in a bar band like some kind of over the hill has-been.

Yes and he doesn't have to split the dough three ways like Mick, Keith and Ronnie

Re: Beatles vs Stones - and other Beatles stuff
Posted by: treaclefingers ()
Date: October 15, 2021 17:33

Quote
Rockman
songs like Martha My Dear, Rocky Raccoon, Yellow Submarine, Bungalow Bill, Maxwell's Silver Hammer etc...

But treacle ya forgot ...... Lavatory Lil

that one got flushed immediately "after release"...bah hahahaha!

Re: Beatles vs Stones - and other Beatles stuff
Posted by: Irix ()
Date: October 15, 2021 17:45



5-Disc Super Deluxe - [open.Spotify.com]

Re: Beatles vs Stones - and other Beatles stuff
Posted by: Erik_Snow ()
Date: October 15, 2021 17:55

After purchasing the xxxx-dollars "Station To Station"deluxe and "Rolling Thunder Revue" vinyl box, I decided to never buy them expensive boxes again. So I'm getting the 2CD of Let It Be....unless I change my mind.

McCartney can eff himself
Posted by: bigbitch ()
Date: October 16, 2021 00:27

WTF is his problem with the Stones? Calling them a blue cover band on a apprente attempt at lame shade throwing. I knew that mofo was up to somethign when he avauled himself to all sort of interviews of late and that special where he kind of goes thrpugh his song writing process which was certainly cool to see but gimem a fuggin break...you what always breaks with me with him is no matter what that mofo is still trying to flay Maxwell's Silver Hammer as some kind of genius...holy shit it reminds me of Lennon bitchign about "Paul writing all thsoe grandma tunes which they most certainly were at times"

Dude - I love the beatles and objectively the Stones aren't goign to win any battles on the ultimate scorecard with them. But I submit that that entire Beatles canon could be held up from the Stones output (both studio and live) adn there is a helluva argument imo about who wins that.

Re: McCartney can eff himself
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: October 16, 2021 00:37

Dont let it upset ya toooo much ...

Slagging..... Sledging of one and other
has been a part of English humor for centuries ....

Mick threw one back at the LA show ...



ROCKMAN

Re: McCartney can eff himself
Posted by: downagain ()
Date: October 16, 2021 00:49

I'm firmly in the "Who cares?" camp.

Re: McCartney can eff himself
Date: October 16, 2021 02:09

I am also in the who cares. So I third this.


You need to think of this differently.


It is this sort of thing that keeps both their names in the headlines.


You read this somewhere obviously and hence Paul got the point across.

Re: McCartney can eff himself
Posted by: Taylor1 ()
Date: October 16, 2021 02:18

Blues cover band?Sitting on A Fence, Ruby Tuesday, She Smiled Sweetly Lady Jane, Satisfaction, Paint it Black, 2000 Light Years From Home, Salt of the Earth, You Can’t Always Get What You Want, Moonlight Mile, Time Waits For No One, Heaven , Can’t You Hear Me Knocking, Wild Horses, Shine A Light, Miss Tou,Memory Motel? .And many other non blues. John Lennon said the Stones copied the Beatles.So I guess the Beatles were a blues cover band

Re: McCartney can eff himself
Posted by: exilestones ()
Date: October 16, 2021 02:25

Paul is trying to get some publicity for his new book.

Did you head Mick’s response? The rivalry goes on. This exchange will live on like Lennon saying that the Stones do everything after the Beatles do.

Re: McCartney can eff himself
Posted by: exilestones ()
Date: October 16, 2021 02:28


Re: McCartney can eff himself
Posted by: MisterO ()
Date: October 16, 2021 02:29

Can't be mad at the person who opened the door for you.

Re: McCartney can eff himself
Posted by: exilestones ()
Date: October 16, 2021 02:31


Re: McCartney can eff himself
Posted by: exilestones ()
Date: October 16, 2021 02:32


Re: McCartney can eff himself
Posted by: exilestones ()
Date: October 16, 2021 02:34


Re: McCartney can eff himself
Posted by: exilestones ()
Date: October 16, 2021 02:35


Re: McCartney can eff himself
Posted by: Taylor1 ()
Date: October 16, 2021 02:35

Had the Beatles never existed the Stones still would have made it. IMO , their early pre Revolvermusic is as great as any in pop music. But a lot of their so called experimental music haven’t aged well and is downright mediocre. Half ofRecolver Pepper and the White Album songs are not great.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2021-10-16 04:17 by Taylor1.

Re: McCartney can eff himself
Posted by: exilestones ()
Date: October 16, 2021 02:35


Re: McCartney can eff himself
Posted by: exilestones ()
Date: October 16, 2021 02:36


Re: McCartney can eff himself
Posted by: exilestones ()
Date: October 16, 2021 02:37


Goto Page: PreviousFirst...169170171172173174175176177178179Next
Current Page: 175 of 179


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 801
Record Number of Users: 189 on August 24, 2021 20:10
Record Number of Guests: 4101 on December 24, 2020 10:57

Previous page Next page First page IORR home