For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
I will threw my two cents into this Ringo compared to Ronnie issue and say that Ringo was there from the start when the first Beatles album was released , along with all of the Beatlemania . So I have to think that Ringo made more money and still does to this day versus Ronnie . According to a Google search I just did Ringo net worth in 2020 was reported at $350 Million dollars , versus Ronnie Wood at $220 Million . I think it pays to have been behind the kit for the Fab Four from Liverpool England .Quote
RollingFreakQuote
ds1984
Ringo got the job because he was the best available drummer that fitted the band.
And what risk did he take? He was in with a band that just got a recording contract.
Right time, right place to go.
They did not need a virtuoso, they just needed a good enough drummer.
No single Beatle is a virtuoso but at least two are geniuses.
We're still shitting on Ringo? They loved Ringo the second they played with him. And he did excellent work with them. He doesn't have to be the greatest of all time, he was exactly what they needed. I'm not sure why that needs to be defended decade after decade. Their word on things should be enough, and his work should speak for itself.
Quote
TheGreek
[ So I have to think that Ringo made more money and still does to this day versus Ronnie . According to a Google search I just did Ringo net worth in 2020 was reported at $350 Million dollars , versus Ronnie Wood at $220 Million . I think it pays to have been behind the kit for the Fab Four from Liverpool England .
Quote
loog droogQuote
TheGreek
[ So I have to think that Ringo made more money and still does to this day versus Ronnie . According to a Google search I just did Ringo net worth in 2020 was reported at $350 Million dollars , versus Ronnie Wood at $220 Million . I think it pays to have been behind the kit for the Fab Four from Liverpool England .
$350 Million vs. $220 Million.
At that level, who cares?
To quote Jack Nicholson in Chinatown, "How much better can you eat??"
Quote
RollingFreakQuote
ds1984
Ringo got the job because he was the best available drummer that fitted the band.
And what risk did he take? He was in with a band that just got a recording contract.
Right time, right place to go.
They did not need a virtuoso, they just needed a good enough drummer.
No single Beatle is a virtuoso but at least two are geniuses.
We're still shitting on Ringo? They loved Ringo the second they played with him. And he did excellent work with them. He doesn't have to be the greatest of all time, he was exactly what they needed. I'm not sure why that needs to be defended decade after decade. Their word on things should be enough, and his work should speak for itself.
Quote
ds1984
I do not "shit" on Ringo
So I wasn't clear enough that he was the right man at the right place at the right time ?
Quote
TheflyingDutchmanQuote
ds1984
I do not "shit" on Ringo
So I wasn't clear enough that he was the right man at the right place at the right time ?
I think that Ringo was the Ron Wood of the Beatles.
Quote
slewanQuote
TheflyingDutchmanQuote
ds1984
I do not "shit" on Ringo
So I wasn't clear enough that he was the right man at the right place at the right time ?
I think that Ringo was the Ron Wood of the Beatles.
that's what I said (somewhere above)
It was great, I'd gladly watch several more hours!Quote
GetYerAngie
..."Get Back". ...But it was way too long and full of repitition...
I much prefer the Let It Be album over Abbey Rd.Quote
GetYerAngie
... after making Abbey Road where they were session musisians to each other (but it was a better album than Let It Be.).
Quote
GetYerAngie
Just saw Peter Jackson's "Get Back". The restauration was marvelous and there were good moments and it's was kind surprising to see how young - and smiling Lennon often looked. But it was way too long and full of repitition. Interesting though in Stones context to see the impact Stones has. One get the idea that the table has turned for good. Were The Beatles now heavily influenced by One plus one/Sympathy for the Devil by Goddard? And by miles surpased by Beggars Banquet comceptually and musically? Yes they were. And then The Beatles split - after making Abbey Road where they were session musisians to each other (but it was a better album than Let It Be.).
OMG big time . As he tried to do it in a very low key kind of manner cracking jokes and such , but they were clearly on his mind for sure !Quote
treaclefingersQuote
GetYerAngie
Just saw Peter Jackson's "Get Back". The restauration was marvelous and there were good moments and it's was kind surprising to see how young - and smiling Lennon often looked. But it was way too long and full of repitition. Interesting though in Stones context to see the impact Stones has. One get the idea that the table has turned for good. Were The Beatles now heavily influenced by One plus one/Sympathy for the Devil by Goddard? And by miles surpased by Beggars Banquet comceptually and musically? Yes they were. And then The Beatles split - after making Abbey Road where they were session musisians to each other (but it was a better album than Let It Be.).
You definitely got the sense that John cared what the Stones were up to.
Quote
Hairball
Thanks Irix - should be fantastic just like all of their other deluxe releases have been.
Quote
TheGreek
This is all very facinating and impressive and I wish the Stones had done something like this with one of there Golden era gems and let us get a peek of there creative and recording process .
Darn shame , but I guess the Stones were very private in regards to there creative process .Quote
treaclefingersQuote
TheGreek
This is all very facinating and impressive and I wish the Stones had done something like this with one of there Golden era gems and let us get a peek of there creative and recording process .
I guess maybe if they had held onto the tapes of the SFTD sessions, we maybe could get even more detail but from that era I think that's probably all we have.
Quote
slewan
so its the stereo and the mono mix of the album plus two other CDs featuring a couple of different takes of diffent songs (can't read the titles but it seems that some times are presented a couple of times)
it short: seems like we're heading for another disappointment…
Quote
slewan
it short: seems like we're heading for another disappointment…
Quote
georgie48
It's nice to read that Julian has found his way back to music. For sure he has inherited some of his dad's talents.
I learned that he is the proud owner of the original sitar that Brian Jones used during the recording of Paint It Black (Brian owned a couple more). He could use the sitar to add a special sound to his music. Brian would have loved the idea.
Best of luck, Julian
Quote
treaclefingersQuote
georgie48
It's nice to read that Julian has found his way back to music. For sure he has inherited some of his dad's talents.
I learned that he is the proud owner of the original sitar that Brian Jones used during the recording of Paint It Black (Brian owned a couple more). He could use the sitar to add a special sound to his music. Brian would have loved the idea.
Best of luck, Julian
Wow, that is cool!
And regarding the 'disappointment' with new Beatles releases...I don't get what the expectation is. It's not like they've got 36 unheard unreleased new tracks ready to drop for 2022. For fans of the Stones and the Beatles the fact we've gotten this much content 50 years on is astounding. Quit acting spoiled! (and that wasn't meant for you Georgie!)
Quote
shawnriffhard1Quote
slewan
it short: seems like we're heading for another disappointment…
What is/are the other "disappointment"(s)? Hasn't every Beatles re-issue been amazing?