Tell Me :
Talk
Include Child of the Moon and Ruby Tuesday and it would be totally a different record..........but then they had to skip 4 other song.......the other hand they could have released them in 2013 as TSMR the luxe edtion
__________________________
Nowadays every hit single by a pop artist is crammed onto their albums. Almost unthinkable to not have a hit on an album,
TSMR would have to have been delayed until spring 1968 for COTM to have been included.
COTM doesn't sound like '68 to me so you must be wrong they might have recorded in '68 but for sure it was written in '67...ask Keith he remember it....... if not ask Bill
__________________________
No, it's enough to close your eyes. Then you'll see where we all come from
People who weren't alive in a certain time can certainly appreciate and understand music more than some who were, vice versa etc etc.
You consider studio music to be artificial anyway.
Like me, you too missed something essential, seeing the real Rolling Stones live.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-08-21 12:28 by His Majesty.
You totally missed my point. And I'm too lazy to explain it. It's not that difficult though.
It always sounded great on acid to me. And sounds equally as exciting completely straight.
Phew.
What about on acid and with your eyes closed?
That's usually what happened anyway. At least for the first couple of hours. ><
First time I found a cover of On With the Show.........she normally play 15 songs on a row the warm up here voice so give here a break
[www.youtube.com]
__________________________
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
Maindefender
()
Date: August 20, 2013 22:46
I know it's been said before, but if Dandelion and We Love You were included would have been incredible. I'm assuming they were recorded fairly close to each other.
Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
NICOS
()
Date: August 20, 2013 22:55
Quote
Maindefender
I know it's been said before, but if Dandelion and We Love You were included would have been incredible. I'm assuming they were recorded fairly close to each other.
Include Child of the Moon and Ruby Tuesday and it would be totally a different record..........but then they had to skip 4 other song.......the other hand they could have released them in 2013 as TSMR the luxe edtion
__________________________
Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
Silver Dagger
()
Date: August 21, 2013 00:27
Quote
Maindefender
I know it's been said before, but if Dandelion and We Love You were included would have been incredible. I'm assuming they were recorded fairly close to each other.
Nowadays every hit single by a pop artist is crammed onto their albums. Almost unthinkable to not have a hit on an album,
Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: August 21, 2013 01:11
Quote
NICOSQuote
Maindefender
I know it's been said before, but if Dandelion and We Love You were included would have been incredible. I'm assuming they were recorded fairly close to each other.
Include Child of the Moon and Ruby Tuesday and it would be totally a different record..........but then they had to skip 4 other song.......the other hand they could have released them in 2013 as TSMR the luxe edtion
TSMR would have to have been delayed until spring 1968 for COTM to have been included.
Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
NICOS
()
Date: August 21, 2013 01:32
Quote
His MajestyQuote
NICOSQuote
Maindefender
I know it's been said before, but if Dandelion and We Love You were included would have been incredible. I'm assuming they were recorded fairly close to each other.
Include Child of the Moon and Ruby Tuesday and it would be totally a different record..........but then they had to skip 4 other song.......the other hand they could have released them in 2013 as TSMR the luxe edtion
TSMR would have to have been delayed until spring 1968 for COTM to have been included.
COTM doesn't sound like '68 to me so you must be wrong
they might have recorded in '68 but for sure it was written in '67...ask Keith he remember it....... if not ask Bill__________________________
Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
kleermaker
()
Date: August 21, 2013 12:00
My older sister had this album with its original sleeve back in the day and it sounded fantastic to me, being 12 years old at that time. To me this album is as much the Stones as Aftermath or Beggars Banquet. Its atmosphere is time catching. A masterpiece imo. As much as I love We Love You, Dandelion and Child Of The Moon, they don't fit in. This album is perfect as it is. 2000 Man is even ahead of its time and almost a prophecy of the future. Sing This All Together belongs on it because it's so typical for the time. A great Stones album without any doubt. But I can imagine that to people who didn't witness that time it sounds strange and not 'stonesy', whatever that means. To fully being able to appreciate and understand the music of the Stones, one should have lived during that time they started and evolved. Those who chimed in later have missed something essential, even if they love those albums. Sorry Doxa and His Majesty! Your advantage is that you're both still young guys 
.
.Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
Doxa
()
Date: August 21, 2013 12:12
Listen the old man! Could be, could be... but distance gives some perspective and objectivity...
But still I claim that really to "get" "Sing This All Altogether" one needs to have had a helluva acid trip...
- Doxa
But still I claim that really to "get" "Sing This All Altogether" one needs to have had a helluva acid trip...
- Doxa
Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: August 21, 2013 12:14
Quote
Doxa
Listen the old man! Could be, could be... but distance gives some perspective and objectivity...
But still I claim that really to "get" "Sing This All Altogether" one needs to have had a helluva acid trip...
- Doxa
No, it's enough to close your eyes. Then you'll see where we all come from
Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
kleermaker
()
Date: August 21, 2013 12:17
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Doxa
Listen the old man! Could be, could be... but distance gives some perspective and objectivity...
But still I claim that really to "get" "Sing This All Altogether" one needs to have had a helluva acid trip...
- Doxa
No, it's enough to close your eyes. Then you'll see where we all come from
Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: August 21, 2013 12:18
Quote
kleermaker
My older sister had this album with its original sleeve back in the day and it sounded fantastic to me, being 12 years old at that time. To me this album is as much the Stones as Aftermath or Beggars Banquet. Its atmosphere is time catching. A masterpiece imo. As much as I love We Love You, Dandelion and Child Of The Moon, they don't fit in. This album is perfect as it is. 2000 Man is even ahead of its time and almost a prophecy of the future. Sing This All Together belongs on it because it's so typical for the time. A great Stones album without any doubt. But I can imagine that to people who didn't witness that time it sounds strange and not 'stonesy', whatever that means. To fully being able to appreciate and understand the music of the Stones, one should have lived during that time they started and evolved. Those who chimed in later have missed something essential, even if they love those albums. Sorry Doxa and His Majesty! Your advantage is that you're both still young guys
People who weren't alive in a certain time can certainly appreciate and understand music more than some who were, vice versa etc etc.
You consider studio music to be artificial anyway.
Like me, you too missed something essential, seeing the real Rolling Stones live.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2013-08-21 12:28 by His Majesty.
Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
kleermaker
()
Date: August 21, 2013 12:32
Quote
His MajestyQuote
kleermaker
My older sister had this album with its original sleeve back in the day and it sounded fantastic to me, being 12 years old at that time. To me this album is as much the Stones as Aftermath or Beggars Banquet. Its atmosphere is time catching. A masterpiece imo. As much as I love We Love You, Dandelion and Child Of The Moon, they don't fit in. This album is perfect as it is. 2000 Man is even ahead of its time and almost a prophecy of the future. Sing This All Together belongs on it because it's so typical for the time. A great Stones album without any doubt. But I can imagine that to people who didn't witness that time it sounds strange and not 'stonesy', whatever that means. To fully being able to appreciate and understand the music of the Stones, one should have lived during that time they started and evolved. Those who chimed in later have missed something essential, even if they love those albums. Sorry Doxa and His Majesty! Your advantage is that you're both still young guys
People who weren't alive in a certain time can certainly appreciate and understand music more than some who were, vice versa etc etc.
You consider studio music to be artificial anyway.
Like me, you too missed something essential, seeing the real Rolling Stones live.
You totally missed my point. And I'm too lazy to explain it. It's not that difficult though.
Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
Silver Dagger
()
Date: August 21, 2013 12:45
Quote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Doxa
Listen the old man! Could be, could be... but distance gives some perspective and objectivity...
But still I claim that really to "get" "Sing This All Altogether" one needs to have had a helluva acid trip...
- Doxa
No, it's enough to close your eyes. Then you'll see where we all come from
It always sounded great on acid to me. And sounds equally as exciting completely straight.
Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: August 21, 2013 13:01
Quote
kleermaker
I'm too lazy to explain it.
Phew.
Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: August 21, 2013 13:07
Quote
Silver DaggerQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Doxa
Listen the old man! Could be, could be... but distance gives some perspective and objectivity...
But still I claim that really to "get" "Sing This All Altogether" one needs to have had a helluva acid trip...
- Doxa
No, it's enough to close your eyes. Then you'll see where we all come from
It always sounded great on acid to me. And sounds equally as exciting completely straight.
What about on acid and with your eyes closed?
Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
Silver Dagger
()
Date: August 21, 2013 13:14
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Silver DaggerQuote
kleermakerQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Doxa
Listen the old man! Could be, could be... but distance gives some perspective and objectivity...
But still I claim that really to "get" "Sing This All Altogether" one needs to have had a helluva acid trip...
- Doxa
No, it's enough to close your eyes. Then you'll see where we all come from
It always sounded great on acid to me. And sounds equally as exciting completely straight.
What about on acid and with your eyes closed?
That's usually what happened anyway. At least for the first couple of hours. >
<Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
TheGreek
()
Date: August 21, 2013 13:48
so you thought you might like to go to the show .to feel that warm thrill of confusion . oh wait a minute wrong show .that space cadet glow . well i got some bad news for you pink isnt well he stayed back at the hotel and they sent us along as a surrogate band to find out where you stand ?are there any @#$%^& in the theatre tonight ? there's one in a 50 and counting stones shirt .get him up against the WALL
Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
MingSubu
()
Date: August 21, 2013 16:21
Interesting little number. I really enjoyed listening to it, on the Satannic box.
Re: Track Talk: On With The Show
Posted by:
NICOS
()
Date: August 23, 2013 23:39
First time I found a cover of On With the Show.........she normally play 15 songs on a row the warm up here voice
so give here a break[www.youtube.com]
__________________________
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
Bashlets , Domonkos , einte , glmmr_twn , jumpingjackflash5 , keithpinkmoon , kkhoranstoned , letitloose6 , martinw , mick64 , mike567 , NilsHolgersson , PaintMonkeyManBlack , peoplewitheyes , Pvk2 , riccardo99 , sebekken , Topi , Torsten , wupperstein
Guests:
1381
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10